ADVERTISEMENT

The cowardice among Republicans is staggering

J GregorGroundhog looking out of his hole and announcing 7 more years of Trump !!!

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: BPKY
So you two partisans agree with this and you then also lack objectivety. How about your cadre of 7? And you have a Clown who has asked the same question, how many times -- 16 times and we're waiting for the 17th time. And he says the same thing over and over. How ironic.

BONGO is also a BOZO!
I repeated YOUR mantra. Its not that I agree. Its your own words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
I repeated YOUR mantra. Its not that I agree. Its your own words.


I wear it as a badge of honor when he capitalizes his name calling and gets all triggered.

That means he's actually starting to realize he's been wrong and is getting frustrated.

He calls us the 7 as though that somehow proves him right and us wrong.

No, it's that we all realize what's happening and he isn't over what happened on 11/08/16. Plain and simple.
 
Never did I say that I was non partisan. _
So you two partisans agree with this and you then also lack objectivety.

Glad you admitted that, as a partisan, you lack objectivity.

Lol OMG this is like the gift that keeps on giving....

Keep a fool talking long enough he usually trips himself up like this.
That's what happens when you tell stories Gregor, you have to actually remember what you said instead of just telling the truth.

This is where he says we don't understand, he meant something else, it's taken out of context, J GregorGroundhog ate his homework,etc ,etc.

Keep digging your hole...J GregorGroundhog


Groundhog-GIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Well if it means anything...

coming from a guy (me) who has sat on the sidelines and has only just now caught up on these 4 pages of thread...

Why did I ignore this thread? Because I saw the title and the originator, I knew it was nothing more than his usual hyper-partisanship on steroids.

Gregor, since you're partisanship is on roids, your hat size must be as large as Barry Bonds'. You haven't hit nearly the amount of HR's as Barry and you definitely lead this board in strikeouts. So for this reason, I'm going to throw you a hanging curveball and give you a chance to hit this out of the park. Ready????

You keep talking about obstruction of justice. You've even mentioned it on these boards. Here is your chance to tell us that Hillary and her cronies obstructed justice. Prove you are not partisan and tell us how! Did she or didn't she?

Go!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: paulbl99 and BGNO
J GregorGroundhog looking out of his hole and announcing 7 more years of Trump !!!

giphy.gif
Hear ye hear ye
This day you will see the way
For out of his hole came Jersey J
And told another whopper.
Now it can be PROCLAIMED
We will need shed no tears
For we will have Trump
For 7 more YEARS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fk_Pitt
J GregorGroundhog looking out of his hole and announcing 7 more years of Trump !!!

giphy.gif
Hear ye hear ye
This day you will see the way
For out of his hole came Jersey J
And told another whopper.
Now it can be PROCLAIMED
We will need shed no tears
For we will have Trump
For 7 more YEARS.

Lol that's awesome LMFAO
 
Well if it means anything...

coming from a guy (me) who has sat on the sidelines and has only just now caught up on these 4 pages of thread...

Why did I ignore this thread? Because I saw the title and the originator, I knew it was nothing more than his usual hyper-partisanship on steroids.

Gregor, since you're partisanship is on roids and your hat size must be as large as Barry Bonds'. You haven't hit nearly the amount of HR's as Barry and lead this board in strikeouts. So for this reason I'm going to throw you a hanging curveball and give you a chance to hit this out of the park. Ready????

You keep talking about obstruction of justice. You've even mentioned it on these boards. Here is your chance to tell us that Hillary and her cronies obstructed justice. Prove you are not partisan and tell us how! Did she or didn't she?

Go!!


Me and Gregor have a deeply psychological relationship.

He's deeply psycho and I'm logical !
 
Well if it means anything...

coming from a guy (me) who has sat on the sidelines and has only just now caught up on these 4 pages of thread...

Why did I ignore this thread? Because I saw the title and the originator, I knew it was nothing more than his usual hyper-partisanship on steroids.

Gregor, since you're partisanship is on roids, your hat size must be as large as Barry Bonds'. You haven't hit nearly the amount of HR's as Barry and you definitely lead this board in strikeouts. So for this reason, I'm going to throw you a hanging curveball and give you a chance to hit this out of the park. Ready????

You keep talking about obstruction of justice. You've even mentioned it on these boards. Here is your chance to tell us that Hillary and her cronies obstructed justice. Prove you are not partisan and tell us how! Did she or didn't she?

Go!!

I'll say two things:

1) Benghazi

2) Trump is the President
 
Hear ye hear ye
This day you will see the way
For out of his hole came Jersey J
And told another whopper.
Now it can be PROCLAIMED
We will need shed no tears
For we will have Trump
For 7 more YEARS.

The last hope for you Partisans.

Two things that could derail:

1) An impeachment (but would the Republicans go all the way)

2) Disillusioned Trump voters.
 
Lol OMG this is like the gift that keeps on giving....

Keep a fool talking long enough he usually trips himself up like this.
That's what happens when you tell stories Gregor, you have to actually remember what you said instead of just telling the truth.

This is where he says we don't understand, he meant something else, it's taken out of context, J GregorGroundhog ate his homework,etc ,etc.

Keep digging your hole...J GregorGroundhog


Groundhog-GIF.gif

Glad to see your FACE again. You stick your face out as often as you post.
 
I'll say two things:

1) Benghazi

2) Trump is the President
She obstructed justice in the aftermath of Benghazi?

And your second part is irrelevant, given that the major issue we are discussing is all intertwined.

I want to know if you can acknowledge and cite that key democratic figures have obstructed justice?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
#19

Can you name a Dem you've ever criticized?

Lmfao

You keep playing with your childhood toys.

You want a name, I'll give you a name: Andrew Jackson. Now go Play with that one.
 
She obstructed justice in the aftermath of Benghazi?

And your second part is irrelevant, given that the major issue we are discussing is all intertwined.

I want to know if you can acknowledge and cite that key democratic figures have obstructed justice?

Bill Clinton was charged. Waiting for the news on someone else. I think the gang of 7 will jump on it when the news does comes out.
 
So you two partisans (BONGO & NC) agree with this and you then also lack objectivety. How about your cadre of 7? And you have a Clown who has asked the same question, how many times -- 16 times and we're waiting for the 17th time. And he says the same thing over and over. How ironic.

BONGO is also a BOZO!


Yes, given some of the contributors. Not sure how you come to that conclusion, but consider that there is a gang of 7, and when answering their nonsense and partisanship, it would mean I posted a lot to correct their B/S.

I need to respond to the nonsense coming from the Republicans with Pres Trump making the news.

BONGO, in his sincere attempt at showing how honorable and nonpartisan he is submitted this master piece of objectivity:

"I have criticized Trump for Tweeting excessively, for his boorish behavior,for the Betsy DeVos appointment among other things" (says BONGO)

Everyone in the Country agrees with the first two, even his own family, and the third is an embarrassment to education. A real gem of a JOKE!

BONGO, now that we straighten out your lack of non partisanship, when will you be able to write a coherent, thought out paragraph explaining anything?
.................................!
 
Bill Clinton was charged. Waiting for the news on someone else. I think the gang of 7 will jump on it when the news does comes out.
Figures. I was right.

Better check your eyesight. I gave you a hanging curve and you failed to produce. I could have hit you between the eyes with a "sledgehammer" and you wouldn't acknowledge it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
Figures. I was right.

Better check your eyesight. I gave you a hanging curve and you failed to produce. I could have hit you between the eyes with a "sledgehammer" and you wouldn't acknowledge it.

I answered you. My hit went right through the pitchers box. You haven't named when this charge was made. Enlighten all of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
I answered you. My hit went right through the pitchers box. You haven't named when this charge was made. Enlighten all of us.
Has nothing to do with charges. The fact that a Dem has to be charged with something before you acknowledge wrong doing speaks loudly to your partisanship. And so does the fact that you can't name anyone relevant in today's world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
Has nothing to do with charges. The fact that a Dem has to be charged with something before you acknowledge wrong doing speaks loudly to your partisanship. And so does the fact that you can't name anyone relevant in today's world.

Are you talking about something that the Repub are accusing Clinton of?

You mean some speculative accusation?
 
Are you talking about something that the Repub are accusing Clinton of?

You mean some speculative accusation?
I'm talking about smashing phones and destroying emails AFTER they were subpoenaed. That would be the definition of obstruction of justice. Right? But...degrees of separation I guess will be your defense. After all, a lowly staffer did it. Not Hillary herself.

Plus, you'll tell me she wasn't charged. But then again, neither was Trump. But it never stopped you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
I'm talking about smashing phones and destroying emails AFTER they were subpoenaed. That would be the definition of obstruction of justice. Right? But...degrees of separation I guess will be your defense. After all, a lowly staffer did it. Not Hillary herself.

Plus, you'll tell me she wasn't charged. But then again, neither was Trump. But it never stopped you.
R = bad , guilty as charged, alleged or reported
D = never bad , NEVER
Proven facts
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fk_Pitt
I need to respond to the nonsense coming from the Republicans with Pres Trump making the news.

BONGO, in his sincere attempt at showing how honorable and nonpartisan he is submitted this master piece of objectivity:

"I have criticized Trump for Tweeting excessively, for his boorish behavior,for the Betsy DeVos appointment among other things" (says BONGO)

Everyone in the Country agrees with the first two, even his own family, and the third is an embarrassment to education. A real gem of a JOKE!

BONGO, now that we straighten out your lack of non partisanship, when will you be able to write a coherent, thought out paragraph explaining anything?
.................................!


The Psychotic Ramblings of a Madman by J GregorGroundhog available at a library near you.

Where's your two Dem criticisms that everybody in the country agrees with?

You can't even produce that. LMFAO
 
Last edited:
The last hope for you Partisans.

Two things that could derail:

1) An impeachment (but would the Republicans go all the way)

2) Disillusioned Trump voters.

Hate to burst your bubble but theres not one conservative here who would shed a tear if Trump were to be impeached. That would mean Pense would take over and we'd have adult supervision once again in the white house and a much more qualified individual to pursue the policies that most center to right of center folks are for.
 
Hate to burst your bubble but theres not one conservative here who would shed a tear if Trump were to be impeached. That would mean Pense would take over and we'd have adult supervision once again in the white house and a much more qualified individual to pursue the policies that most center to right of center folks are for.

Yeah where he gets this idea that we really give 2 shits about Trump personally who knows?

Like you say Pence rolls in and it's business as usual plus.

He acts like Hillary would come in or Obama would get a reboot.

That's why it's very simply "The Psychotic Ramblings of a Madman" by J GregorGroundhog.

He has no understanding that we aren't lemmings for Trump like he is for the Clintons.
That's what gives away his hyper-partisanship continually.

He thinks because he worships at the altar of Obama and the Clintons and Pelosi we are all just the same with Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fk_Pitt
Hate to burst your bubble but theres not one conservative here who would shed a tear if Trump were to be impeached. That would mean Pense would take over and we'd have adult supervision once again in the white house and a much more qualified individual to pursue the policies that most center to right of center folks are for.
Hey @JGregor....what he said!!!
 
Yeah where he gets this idea that we really give 2 shits about Trump personally who knows?

Like you say Pence rolls in and it's business as usual plus.

He acts like Hillary would come in or Obama would get a reboot.

That's why it's very simply "The Psychotic Ramblings of a Madman" by J GregorGroundhog.

He has no understanding that we aren't lemmings for Trump like he is for the Clintons.
That's what gives away his hyper-partisanship continually.

He thinks because he worships at the altar of Obama and the Clintons and Pelosi we are all just the same with Trump
tenor.gif.cf.gif
 
Hey he’s paid good money to repeat his nonsense
He has to be.

It's just not normal for a grown man to have such an aversion to providing any proof of any of his claims or telling the truth.

He tried to take a shot at me for criticizing Trump for excessive Tweeting and Boorish behavior because everyone knows it.

But yet everyone knows there are plenty of things in the last 10 years a Dem has done but he can't think of any.

A very simple one that a monkey could name would be Eric Holder.
Obama didn't use executive privilege on him because he didn't pay his electric bill.

But he just doesn't seem to be able to think outside the box to name anything

Pity
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulbl99
It's just not normal for a grown man to have such an aversion to providing any proof of any of his claims or telling the truth.

He tried to take a shot at me for criticizing Trump for excessive Tweeting and Boorish behavior because everyone knows it.

But yet we know there are plenty of things in the last 10 years a Dem has done but he can't think of any.

A very simple one that a monkey could name would be Eric Holder.
Obama didn't use executive privilege on him because he didn't pay his electric bill.

But he just doesn't seem to be able to think outside the box to name anything

Pity
Eric Holder is considering a 2020 run for President.

Please. Please please.

Seriously though, the ego of these people. The guy was corrupt...and doesn't have the incredible and natural charisma of Barack Obama. What makes him think anyone will vote for him?

I saw Alan Dershowitz on tv last night...and he was asked to comment on a statement that Holder made this week about Trump, while Holder was on Maddow's show. Needless to say, The Harvard Law professor and constitutional attorney listed the reasons why Holder was either lying...or simply wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
I'm talking about smashing phones and destroying emails AFTER they were subpoenaed. That would be the definition of obstruction of justice. Right? But...degrees of separation I guess will be your defense. After all, a lowly staffer did it. Not Hillary herself.

Plus, you'll tell me she wasn't charged. But then again, neither was Trump. But it never stopped you.

I think you were on track until the last sentence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eric Holder is considering a 2020 run for President.

Please. Please please.

Seriously though, the ego of these people. The guy was corrupt...and doesn't have the incredible and natural charisma of Barack Obama. What makes him think anyone will vote for him?

I saw Alan Dershowitz on tv last night...and he was asked to comment on a statement that Holder made this week about Trump, while Holder was on Maddow's show. Needless to say, The Harvard Law professor and constitutional attorney listed the reasons why Holder was either lying...or simply wrong.

I recorded the show but have yet to watch it. Since you mentioned this, I wont delete it. Usually I delete shows that I didn't watch.
 
Eric Holder is considering a 2020 run for President.

Please. Please please.

Seriously though, the ego of these people. The guy was corrupt...and doesn't have the incredible and natural charisma of Barack Obama. What makes him think anyone will vote for him?

I saw Alan Dershowitz on tv last night...and he was asked to comment on a statement that Holder made this week about Trump, while Holder was on Maddow's show. Needless to say, The Harvard Law professor and constitutional attorney listed the reasons why Holder was either lying...or simply wrong.
Trump would crush him
Like the sniveling little pissant he is.
 
I recorded the show but have yet to watch it. Since you mentioned this, I wont delete it. Usually I delete shows that I didn't watch.
Maddow? It was likely Maddow's show from Tuesday or wed. Let me know what he says. I can't remember...it may have been about Trump and impeachment...but a real attorney (Dershowitz) said he was full of $h!t
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGNO
Eric Holder is considering a 2020 run for President.

Please. Please please.

Seriously though, the ego of these people. The guy was corrupt...and doesn't have the incredible and natural charisma of Barack Obama. What makes him think anyone will vote for him?

I saw Alan Dershowitz on tv last night...and he was asked to comment on a statement that Holder made this week about Trump, while Holder was on Maddow's show. Needless to say, The Harvard Law professor and constitutional attorney listed the reasons why Holder was either lying...or simply wrong.
Trump would crush him
Like the sniveling little pissant he is.

J GregorGroundhog could be Holders Secretary of Agriculture since he's been digging so many holes. He should be able to give expert soil analysis by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fk_Pitt
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT