ADVERTISEMENT

Tonight's Total

FireballZ

Senior
Jan 3, 2016
4,786
4,196
113
Anyone know what's going on with it? Opened at 133.5 yesterday. Dropped all the way down to 129.5 a few hours ago, but is back up to 130.5. 4 points is a big movement unless someone is potentially injured? Did someone wise jump all over the under not realizing Bennett is long gone?
 
Anyone know what's going on with it? Opened at 133.5 yesterday. Dropped all the way down to 129.5 a few hours ago, but is back up to 130.5. 4 points is a big movement unless someone is potentially injured? Did someone wise jump all over the under not realizing Bennett is long gone?
That is a large movement. Did it close at 130.5? Under would have taken it.

You could still get UVa + money when they were up over 10 points. But I never bet against Pitt. Probably should like SMF said. Ease the post loss depression.
 
That is a large movement. Did it close at 130.5? Under would have taken it.

You could still get UVa + money when they were up over 10 points. But I never bet against Pitt. Probably should like SMF said. Ease the post loss depression.
I never bet period, but you're right, a few hundred bucks profit would have eased the depression of the loss
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atilla Cosby
I watched ESPN SC with Scott Van Pelt and Stanford Steve ... their first "bad beat" was the Pitt UVA game over/under. The total score/points was 130; over/under was 130.5. The last 1:55 of the game saw no change in that number

The second "bad beat" was Dunn making the three at the last second of the WF game to prevent the Demon Deacons from covering
 
I watched ESPN SC with Scott Van Pelt and Stanford Steve ... their first "bad beat" was the Pitt UVA game over/under. The total score/points was 130; over/under was 130.5. The last 1:55 of the game saw no change in that number

The second "bad beat" was Dunn making the three at the last second of the WF game to prevent the Demon Deacons from covering
Even non-Pitt fans hate this team.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT