Why do you find it reprehensible? If you polled the players, I guarantee just about all of them want to come back. Not so sure what the big deal is? I just started practices again with my softball team and made them sign waivers too. If they want to play, they needed to sign, if not and they are worried, they do not need to sign and therefore can't play.I find this reprehensible. I think this is so wrong. I also expect most colleges to do the exact same thing.
As an aside, would the NCAA allow a special extra year of eligibility if a player decides the risk is too much?
Why do you find it reprehensible? If you polled the players, I guarantee just about all of them want to come back. Not so sure what the big deal is? I just started practices again with my softball team and made them sign waivers too. If they want to play, they needed to sign, if not and they are worried, they do not need to sign and therefore can't play.
Why?If I were 18-22 I would have no problem signing a waiver!
Why do you find it reprehensible? If you polled the players, I guarantee just about all of them want to come back. Not so sure what the big deal is? I just started practices again with my softball team and made them sign waivers too. If they want to play, they needed to sign, if not and they are worried, they do not need to sign and therefore can't play.
Some lawyer is going to love you. Making someone sign a contract under duress isn’t a good look.
Why do you find it reprehensible? If you polled the players, I guarantee just about all of them want to come back. Not so sure what the big deal is? I just started practices again with my softball team and made them sign waivers too. If they want to play, they needed to sign, if not and they are worried, they do not need to sign and therefore can't play.
I think some lawyer is going to have a better understanding of duress. This ain't it.
Why?
Only if the school is contractually obligated to pay for my treatment AND honor my full scholarship
Are we going to be asked to do this to go to work?
You aren't going to be asked to do that if you go to work, because if you get sick at work you are going to be covered under workman's comp. Since the NCAA insists that student-athletes are NOT employees they are not covered under workman's comp.
Correct which is one of the issues I have here.
The most disturbing part of it is that they make it look like it's some sort of patriotic (to OSU) duty. Meanwhile it's a self-serving contract on the part of the university to protect the university, disguised as an oath of loyalty.gross. i've said it many times: if we take our anti-psu bias out of it, OSU is clearly the more disgusting program.
You mean actually successful in their win at all cost approachgross. i've said it many times: if we take our anti-psu bias out of it, OSU is clearly the more disgusting program.
Right which is the yuck part of thisYou aren't going to be asked to do that if you go to work, because if you get sick at work you are going to be covered under workman's comp. Since the NCAA insists that student-athletes are NOT employees they are not covered under workman's comp.
Every HS in PA has to come up with their own individual safety plan to return school and athletics. I know of at least 30+ schools who've been advised to have waivers signed by parents to allow their kids to participate in athletics this fall.
So is this the way we're going? Trump love his fans but doesn't want any responsibility if they contract Covid-19 at his rally. Major colleges are going to put the blame and responsibility on players if they contract Covid-19 at a university owned facility. It's a lot like consumers being forced to give up the right to engage in a class action lawsuit but instead have to go to arbitration. There's got to be a loophole for the players somewhere.Even as a 18-22 year old, I probably would have a problem signing
the waiver. No for me but parents and other elders I would be around.