You’re not very smartOf course. YOu are all correct. Clemson will dominate. LOL.
You continue to make no sense on this. They lost a game - so what. Kansas lost tonight too, is it dumb to think they will win the Big 12?
Did bballinsider say they were going to go 20-0 in ACC play?
Promised my wife, as part of my New Year's resolution, that I would stop challenging stupid, moronic comments that I hear at Pitt games. At the end of the Clemson game, guy behind me starts spouting off about how this is the same old Pitt, beats Cuse, Carolina, UNC then losses to a bad team at home. Had to point out the obvious to anyone who knows bball that they are pretty darn good. She just looked at me walking up the steps and says, "well your resolution didn't last too long, did It"!UNC has the most talent but Clemson has the best team. Hunter Tyson is arguably the best player in the league and PJ Hall is the 2nd best big behind Bacot. And they have a nice supporting cast.
Au Contraire. I graduated Magna Cum Laude as a Chem E, so I quickly realize when people are ignoring history of an entrenched conference and love to latch on to the next “big” thing. As pointed out yesterday Clemson is benefiting from a soft schedule and will highly likely fade as the season goes on. You need only look at the last ten years and see what three teams have won the league time and time again. I am sure you can figure it out. And that will not change. Those three teams will get better as the season goes on and the talent develops. And the league recognizes how much they need them And cannot afford to ever Lose them to another conference.You’re not very smart
Au Contraire. I graduated Magna Cum Laude as a Chem E, so I quickly realize when people are ignoring history of an entrenched conference and love to latch on to the next “big” thing. As pointed out yesterday Clemson is benefiting from a soft schedule and will highly likely fade as the season goes on. You need only look at the last ten years and see what three teams have won the league time and time again. I am sure you can figure it out. And that will not change. Those three teams will get better as the season goes on and the talent develops. And the league recognizes how much they need them And cannot afford to ever Lose them to another conference.
What I hate are “clever” people who love to post like they actually know something that others do not. Then they also get found out and ignore what they once said.
Good day to you sir and yes I will post again as Clemson continues to plummet.
Looking forward to it. I'd be willing to bet they finish top 3 in the ACC.Au Contraire. I graduated Magna Cum Laude as a Chem E, so I quickly realize when people are ignoring history of an entrenched conference and love to latch on to the next “big” thing. As pointed out yesterday Clemson is benefiting from a soft schedule and will highly likely fade as the season goes on. You need only look at the last ten years and see what three teams have won the league time and time again. I am sure you can figure it out. And that will not change. Those three teams will get better as the season goes on and the talent develops. And the league recognizes how much they need them And cannot afford to ever Lose them to another conference.
What I hate are “clever” people who love to post like they actually know something that others do not. Then they also get found out and ignore what they once said.
Good day to you sir and yes I will post again as Clemson continues to plummet.
Their history has literally zero to do with this season. As does PITT’s last 6 years.Au Contraire. I graduated Magna Cum Laude as a Chem E, so I quickly realize when people are ignoring history of an entrenched conference and love to latch on to the next “big” thing. As pointed out yesterday Clemson is benefiting from a soft schedule and will highly likely fade as the season goes on. You need only look at the last ten years and see what three teams have won the league time and time again. I am sure you can figure it out. And that will not change. Those three teams will get better as the season goes on and the talent develops. And the league recognizes how much they need them And cannot afford to ever Lose them to another conference.
What I hate are “clever” people who love to post like they actually know something that others do not. Then they also get found out and ignore what they once said.
Good day to you sir and yes I will post again as Clemson continues to plummet.
I’d make a friendly wager they finish in the top 4 of the conference at worstAu Contraire. I graduated Magna Cum Laude as a Chem E, so I quickly realize when people are ignoring history of an entrenched conference and love to latch on to the next “big” thing. As pointed out yesterday Clemson is benefiting from a soft schedule and will highly likely fade as the season goes on. You need only look at the last ten years and see what three teams have won the league time and time again. I am sure you can figure it out. And that will not change. Those three teams will get better as the season goes on and the talent develops. And the league recognizes how much they need them And cannot afford to ever Lose them to another conference.
What I hate are “clever” people who love to post like they actually know something that others do not. Then they also get found out and ignore what they once said.
Good day to you sir and yes I will post again as Clemson continues to plummet.
At least the guy attended the Clemson game. You usually hear a lot more stupid comments from fans who only go to games when the opponent is Duke, UNC or ND.Promised my wife, as part of my New Year's resolution, that I would stop challenging stupid, moronic comments that I hear at Pitt games. At the end of the Clemson game, guy behind me starts spouting off about how this is the same old Pitt, beats Cuse, Carolina, UNC then losses to a bad team at home. Had to point out the obvious to anyone who knows bball that they are pretty darn good. She just looked at me walking up the steps and says, "well your resolution didn't last too long, did It"!
Bet you $50 they finish in the top 3. Loser donates the $50 to the Pitt athletics fund of the winner's choice.Looking forward to it. I'd be willing to bet they finish top 3 in the ACC.
You bet Clemson finishes in the top 3? That's what I would bet.Bet you $50 they finish in the top 3. Loser donates the $50 to the Pitt athletics fund of the winner's choice.
Top 3 of the ACC. Yup.You bet Clemson finishes in the top 3? That's what I would bet.
I'm very clearly responding to the wrong person!I agree with you. Why would I bet??
Some lucky womens program is gonna get jipped out of 50 twice when you both think you’ve won
There’s a bell curve to every populationBeing an Engineering major myself, I knew some Chem Es when I was in school. I always thought that was the toughest of the Engineering majors, at least at Pitt.
I am now rethinking that stance.
It was and is. That is why the Chem E’s were on the top floor of Benedum and even grad students were lower. We were closer to the God that made us the brilliant folks we are.Being an Engineering major myself, I knew some Chem Es when I was in school. I always thought that was the toughest of the Engineering majors, at least at Pitt.
I am now rethinking that stance.
I am still waiting for Insider to take my $1000 bet. He gets Clemson. I get The field.Bet you $50 they finish in the top 3. Loser donates the $50 to the Pitt athletics fund of the winner's choice.
I know people hate to have folks pop their protective bubble but that’s the way it goes.
No, I really do understand the ebbs and flows of basketball. I also ABSOLUTELY understand this conference as well. You are a fraud insider. Matt was a true insider back in the day but you really are not. Continue on with your arrogance that changes which each time you eff up some inside prediction. I do kind of believe you may be SMF with a different handle.Their history has literally zero to do with this season. As does PITT’s last 6 years.
The idea that the ACC is somehow cheating for the best teams that always have the most talent is… well odd.
You may be very intelligent, you just don’t understand the ebbs and flows of college hoops. You can stay here and possibly learn
What the bubble that this board suddenly has become TigerLair? say it ain’t so Joe.And yet your are such a nice guy that you blow up everyone else's bubble!
Yet you continue to insist the best team in the ACC isn’t one of the top 3 because they beat Pitt by 1 on the road. It’s an odd hill to die on.No, I really do understand the ebbs and flows of basketball. I also ABSOLUTELY understand this conference as well. You are a fraud insider. Matt was a true insider back in the day but you really are not. Continue on with your arrogance that changes which each time you eff up some inside prediction. I do kind of believe you may be SMF with a different handle.
What the bubble that this board suddenly has become TigerLair? say it ain’t so Joe.
Now it’s top three is it? See how quickly you change. I haven’t said they aren’t top three but I am certainly to take Ski’s bet because the funds go to Pitt, so I win either way.Yet you continue to insist the best team in the ACC isn’t one of the top 3 because they beat Pitt by 1 on the road. It’s an odd hill to die on.
Never said they weren’t a good team. I said they arę a team we should beat. All the other boosters came back at me saying they are the best and will win the conference. I am just now having fun watching these geniuses backpedal after the first loss.And that's it in a nutshell. You think that just because other people think that the team that is currently in first place in the league is a decent team, well, that makes this the Tiger Lair. And you simply can't conceive that even if a team doesn't win the ACC regular season championship that they could still be a pretty good team.
Maybe the high altitude at Benedum deprived your brain of too much oxygen?
They’re currently the best team in the ACC. Why are you LITERALLY dying on this hill? That’s the most overused term of all time, but you’re dying bro.Now it’s top three is it? See how quickly you change. I haven’t said they aren’t top three but I am certainly to take Ski’s bet because the funds go to Pitt, so I win either way.
You however aren’t willing to take my $1000 bet.
Never said they weren’t a good team. I said they arę a team we should beat. All the other boosters came back at me saying they are the best and will win the conference. I am just now having fun watching these geniuses backpedal after the first loss.
I am not dying on any hill. They are the leader in the conference at the moment but most certainly are not the best team. Jesus. Again bye bye. And I withdraw the bet because you are too much of a coward to take it.They’re currently the best team in the ACC. Why are you LITERALLY dying on this hill? That’s the most overused term of all time, but you’re dying bro.
Never said they weren’t a good team. I said they arę a team we should beat. All the other boosters came back at me saying they are the best and will win the conference. I am just now having fun watching these geniuses backpedal after the first loss.
I mean he’s also claiming someone is gonna steal the Diaz Graham brothers (like nasty Miami or Duke through tampering and NIL) and their 5 PPG on the potential. He must be off his medsActually what you called them was a "lesser team" and said that a team like Pitt that is turning the corner should not lose to a team like them.
Of course shortly after that you admitted that you really didn't know anything about them, so there is that.
I mean he’s also claiming someone is gonna steal the Diaz Graham brothers (like nasty Miami or Duke through tampering and NIL) and their 5 PPG on the potential. He must be off his meds
please go read his take on the Diaz Graham brothers transferring up because of NIL/Tampering. Your mind will be blownI dont know what's worse, his take on Clemson or his plea to Chris to ban me after I told a PSU troll that they shouldn't be "celebrating" beating a 3 loss Pac 12 team since I posted it during the MNF Hamlin injury.
And to be fair to PSU, being the 4th best Big Ten team and winning their first big game since 2016 against a team UCLA rocked was big for themI dont know what's worse, his take on Clemson or his plea to Chris to ban me after I told a PSU troll that they shouldn't be "celebrating" beating a 3 loss Pac 12 team since I posted it during the MNF Hamlin injury.
Their starting PG was hurt and did not play. We would have beat them easily too without Hunter.The Blue Blood Clemson Tigers lost tonight. Can you frigging imagine?
And to be fair to PSU, being the 4th best Big Ten team and winning their first big game since 2016 against a team UCLA rocked was big for them