ADVERTISEMENT

What Happens if Johnny Majors Stays at Pitt

I thought that was on Sherrill. By the time Foge was in they were already committed to Bowen. Jelic I thought had a Pitt connection
Bowen also had a Pitt connection. His father, Dick, was a running back at Pitt from 1955-57. Bowen was a Parade All-American, so he wasn't a slouch of a recruit, but he didn't pan out. It was Congemi who beat him out. He wasn't a bad qb, but he wasn't Kosar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard A
Congemi was nowhere close to Kosar. John was originally from Youngstown before the family moved to Florida. Had the family stayed, Congemi and Kosar would’ve faced off twice when Mooney played Boardman.

The clip of Kosar at the 32-second mark throwing a pass downfield really makes you wonder why Earl Bruce and Sherrill, just to name a few, were so hesitant to offer Bernie.

 
Congemi was nowhere close to Kosar. John was originally from Youngstown before the family moved to Florida. Had the family stayed, Congemi and Kosar would’ve faced off twice when Mooney played Boardman.

The clip of Kosar at the 32-second mark throwing a pass downfield really makes you wonder why Earl Bruce and Sherrill, just to name a few, were so hesitant to offer Bernie.


He wasn't the most athletic looking QB around at that time and had kind of a strange delivery. But that Orange bowl against Nebraska started to change things in college football. It was a lot of wishbone, veers, options. Bernie tore Nebraska to shreds since they really hadn't played against something like that before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeftCoastPanther
Really I never heard that before. Down with Jackie.
In regards to Jackie if he stayed Pitt definitely would have won at least 1 maybe 2 NC. But how many times would Pitt been on probation for recruiting violations.
Almost no schools got hit for that. And the rep was really high.
 
No. It was 1993 and the very next year Penn State went undefeated. The first Big 10 team to go undefeated since Ohio State in 1968.
It always blew my mind that the Big 10 gave Ped State bye weeks before the Michigan and Ohio State games those first years, plus Michigan had to play them the week after their second biggest rival MSU.
 
The Big Ten was so down in 1994, too. Ohio State and Michigan lost four games apiece, Wisconsin had a losing record I believe and MSU was departing with Pearles.
 
Congemi was nowhere close to Kosar. John was originally from Youngstown before the family moved to Florida. Had the family stayed, Congemi and Kosar would’ve faced off twice when Mooney played Boardman.

The clip of Kosar at the 32-second mark throwing a pass downfield really makes you wonder why Earl Bruce and Sherrill, just to name a few, were so hesitant to offer Bernie.

That's right, he graduated with a Finance Degree in 3 years if I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeftCoastPanther
Penn State killed Pitt football when they hired Joe Paterno in 1966. Paterno put the final nail in the coffin in 1981 with 48-14. Pitt would never finish a season in the top 10 ever again. That was 44 years ago.
If PITT had kept Jackie, Joe would still be whining in his grave about losing recruits to PITT.
 
I saw that game. It was absolutely horrible. We jumped out to a 14-0 lead, but then Marino was intercepted in the end zone and they scored the next 48 points.

In 1981, Pitt's final AP Poll ranking was #4. In 1982, their final ranking in the Coaches Poll was #9. It was from 1983 on that they were never again ranked in the top 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cbpitt2
If PITT had kept Jackie, Joe would still be whining in his grave about losing recruits to PITT.
How far back do you have to go to find a Pitt coach with a winning (above .500) record against Penn State? None had a winning record against Paterno or Franklin.
 
Pitt chose basketball and 20 years later after joining the Big East was still playing in the same decrepit arena. That is Pitt in a nutshell. Too bad Gavitt didn’t insist when the invitation went out that a new arena needed to ready for play by 1990 at the latest.
 
Don't leave me hanging. What is correct?

Walter Milligan was 2-1 against the nitters. Before that Wesley Fesler (that sounds like a fake name) was 1-0. Clark Shaughnessy was 2-1.

Also, he did say above .500, but John Michelosen was 5-5-1 in 11 games against them in the 50s and 60s.
 
Walter Milligan was 2-1 against the nitters. Before that Wesley Fesler (that sounds like a fake name) was 1-0. Clark Shaughnessy was 2-1.

Also, he did say above .500, but John Michelosen was 5-5-1 in 11 games against them in the 50s and 60s.
I knew it would be records like those. The last coach to have a meaningful winning record against Penn State was Jock Sutherland.
 
From 1955-1965, Pitt went 5-5-1 against PSU. Literally dead even. Paterno is hired in 1966. PSU immediately wins 10 straight. It’s pretty straightforward. The college football world saw this as a flip being switched in Pennsylvania.

Now Pitt was an established football power at this time, so they weren’t just going to disappear overnight, but you could see the writing on the wall. Both programs were national powers in the 70’s and went toe to toe.

But then 1981 happened, and both programs immediately went in opposite directions. Pitt would never recover, while PSU went on to play for 3 national championships over the next 5 years.

And the timing couldn’t have been worse for Pitt, as this was around the time that the Big Ten started looking east for expansion, and we all know how that played out.

Any reasonable person can deduce that if PSU never hired Paterno, Pitt would have remained the sole football power in PA over the 70’s and 80’s. Think of the stars that PSU signed during that time, and imagine Pitt getting them instead. What would Pitt football have looked like in the 80’s? And who do think the Big Ten would have eyed for expansion?

Yes, Pitt has been steadily de-emphasizing football over the last few decades, but it isn’t due to some secret agenda, it’s because of the circumstances that they found themselves in. PSU grew into a powerhouse and Pitt just couldn’t compete anymore. Period.

Ask yourself this: If Pitt were invited to the B10 instead of PSU, do think the administration would have de-emphasized football? Do you see Rutgers or Northwestern de-emphasizing football? Or any P2 school, for that matter?
Your a Penn State troll. Go take a shower with Jerry.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Frames Janklin
From 1955-1965, Pitt went 5-5-1 against PSU. Literally dead even. Paterno is hired in 1966. PSU immediately wins 10 straight. It’s pretty straightforward. The college football world saw this as a flip being switched in Pennsylvania. Pitt deemphasized football like no program ever did in 1965. It required athletes to have two years of a foreign language, hence the garbage records from 1965-72. Majors wasn’t beating the Lions right away until he gathered some recruiting classes.

Now Pitt was an established football power at this time, so they weren’t just going to disappear overnight, but you could see the writing on the wall. Both programs were national powers in the 70’s and went toe to toe. Pitt deemphasized again in 1982 hoping Fazio could win being a Pitt guy and all. Hoping to win without a plan is a recipe for failure, which he did. Gottfried’s rebuild after Fazio was slow but he collected back-to-back top 5 recruiting classes and finally had his QB in place in 1989. Fired for being “difficult.”

But then 1981 happened, and both programs immediately went in opposite directions. Pitt would never recover, while PSU went on to play for 3 national championships over the next 5 years. See above. PSU also lost 3-plus games in five of the last seven seasons that decade. It also lost to Pitt in 1984, ‘87, ‘88 and Pitt had a late TD called back by a terrible call in 1989 from winning that one.

And the timing couldn’t have been worse for Pitt, as this was around the time that the Big Ten started looking east for expansion, and we all know how that played out.Pitt never fit the B10 mold and I’m sure the B10 is glad it never considered Pitt. I bet the Big East had buyer’s remorse with adding Pitt with its crummy hoops and facility before Howland arrived. Then there was BE football, which needed credibility and what did Pitt do? Deemphasized football again heading into the 1990s and drove a damn stake through the program. A repeat of 1965-72.

Any reasonable person can deduce that if PSU never hired Paterno, Pitt would have remained the sole football power in PA over the 70’s and 80’s. Think of the stars that PSU signed during that time, and imagine Pitt getting them instead. What would Pitt football have looked like in the 80’s? And who do think the Big Ten would have eyed for expansion? The university never would’ve allowed football to remain a power. If it cared it never would’ve let Sherrill walk or hired Fazio. Post WWII, Pitt has a history of knocking down something good. It just won’t allow athletics to be bigger than its mission statement.

Yes, Pitt has been steadily de-emphasizing football over the last few decades, but it isn’t due to some secret agenda, it’s because of the circumstances that they found themselves in. PSU grew into a powerhouse and Pitt just couldn’t compete anymore. Period. Pitt almost upset PSU in 1999 and did so in 2000. Pitt could have competed up until NIL. Now, no way.

Ask yourself this: If Pitt were invited to the B10 instead of PSU, do think the administration would have de-emphasized football? Do you see Rutgers or Northwestern de-emphasizing football? Or any P2 school, for that matter? If Pitt was invited, it would have more resources but would still mismanage the program because the school would never be all in. It just wants conference revenue checks and acting like it cares. If it cared, the past 43 years would look different. Actually, since 1938 would look different.
 
I knew it would be records like those. The last coach to have a meaningful winning record against Penn State was Jock Sutherland.


From Sutherland to Jackie Sherrill the number of Pitt head coaches who was here for longer than four seasons is exactly one, and he was the guy who went .500 against the nitters, so yeah, of course it was going to be something like that. Simiarly, if you listed the coaches in that time with losing records against Penn State, most of them would look like that too.

If you bump it up to five (continuous) years, there was only one head coach here longer than that from Sutherland all the way up to Walt Harris.
 
Pitt joined the Big East in 1981
From a basketball perspective I always saw Pitt as being more of a Metro Conference school than a Big East school.

I think Joe Paterno's conference idea was a good idea but in the end he screwed himself because it was clear what his intentions were.
 
I’m not sure what Pitts overall record was vs the Nits but 87-88 were both Pitt wins with Gottfried… I’m not sure if Pitt and PSU hadn’t continually played Pitt wouldn’t have looked a bit more even… Paterno had some shit years there after Casey… in any event I’m not sure people realize how bizarre the on again off again bullshit is in the state of PA

This doesn’t happen anywhere else regardless of which side is the better team.

UGA/GT … every year
UofM/ MSU… every year
Florida/FSU… every year
Miami/FSU… every year
Colorado/Colorado State… every year…


And on and on it goes… only in PA for some bizarre reason is this considered “normal”…it f@cking weird… and it started because of a bitter old bastard
 
From a basketball perspective I always saw Pitt as being more of a Metro Conference school than a Big East school.

I think Joe Paterno's conference idea was a good idea but in the end he screwed himself because it was clear what his intentions were.
Penn State would have still jumped to the Big 10 even if Paterno’s Conference happened, the tv money was to good to pass up.
 
was it really that much better in the early 90's when it all went down? Would it have been all that much more than the Eastern all sports conference?
What was the initial plan for the conference?

North: Pitt, PSU, WVU, Syracuse, BC, Rutgers
South: Louisville, Cincinnati, South Carolina, Florida State, Miami, Tulane

That is so much better than the B10 in 1993.
 
was it really that much better in the early 90's when it all went down? Would it have been all that much more than the Eastern all sports conference?
The Big 10 schools got a big bump in money in the deal with ABC when Penn State joined, especially compared to the CFA schools (ACC, Big 8, SEC, SWC, WAC and Independents), that Big 10 ABC deal is what caused the SEC and Notre Dame to break away from the CFA a few years later and do their own tv deals.
 
What was the initial plan for the conference?

North: Pitt, PSU, WVU, Syracuse, BC, Rutgers
South: Louisville, Cincinnati, South Carolina, Florida State, Miami, Tulane

That is so much better than the B10 in 1993.
Initially it would have been Penn State, Pitt, WVU, Syracuse, BC, Temple, Rutgers and hopes that Maryland would jump from the ACC. A reminder that both Cincy and Louisville were borderline 1AA teams pretty much worse than Temple & Rutgers in the early 80's, they weren't even on the radar when the conference was proposed. The biggie is if the Paterno Conference could have gotten Florida State or Miami to join later in the 80's, it's doubtful FSU would have joined since they were/are a southern school that wanted to be in a southern conference. Miami initially joined the Big East to improve their basketball, would they have joined what would basically be a mid-major basketball conference, which is what the Paterno Conference would have been.
 
What was the initial plan for the conference?

North: Pitt, PSU, WVU, Syracuse, BC, Rutgers
South: Louisville, Cincinnati, South Carolina, Florida State, Miami, Tulane

That is so much better than the B10 in 1993.

The key would have been Pitt remaining committed like they were 1976-1982. If so, Pitt-PSU would have been bigger than Michigan-OSU in the early 90's and the Eastern conference would have been just as strong if not stronger than the Big 10. Also remember the Big 10 was always the Big 2 , Little 8 until Alvarez and Frye breathed some life in Iowa and Wisconsin in the early 90's. So there wouldn't have been that much difference between the conferences had Pitt held up their end of the bargain (which probably wouldn't have happened).
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeftCoastPanther
I’m not sure what Pitts overall record was vs the Nits but 87-88 were both Pitt wins with Gottfried… I’m not sure if Pitt and PSU hadn’t continually played Pitt wouldn’t have looked a bit more even… Paterno had some shit years there after Casey… in any event I’m not sure people realize how bizarre the on again off again bullshit is in the state of PA

This doesn’t happen anywhere else regardless of which side is the better team.

UGA/GT … every year
UofM/ MSU… every year
Florida/FSU… every year
Miami/FSU… every year
Colorado/Colorado State… every year…


And on and on it goes… only in PA for some bizarre reason is this considered “normal”…it f@cking weird… and it started because of a bitter old bastard
Dude's been dead for over a decade, and is pretty much persona non grata over there. If the people in power now wanted it to happen, it would. Whatever is going on today has nothing to do with Paterno.
 
The Big 10 schools got a big bump in money in the deal with ABC when Penn State joined, especially compared to the CFA schools (ACC, Big 8, SEC, SWC, WAC and Independents), that Big 10 ABC deal is what caused the SEC and Notre Dame to break away from the CFA a few years later and do their own tv deals.
ND always wanted their own TV deal. In fact in the 50’s ND and had their own deals set until the NCAA told both schools that they would be ousted from the NCAA. It took until Georgia and if I remember correctly Oklahoma in the mid 80’s sued the NCAA over the TV rights at the time. At the same time ESPN was coming into existence when the influx of more games being televised. The NCAA had no power to stop conferences to start making TV deals with ESPN ABC and NBC negotiated the deal with ND. Also USA network made a deal with the SWC to cover their games and TBS had a contract with the SEC.

The main reason for the legal challenges was the contract with ABC was a schools were limited on how many times they could have their games either shown nationally or regionally. There was a thought back then if schools were on TV too much it would hurt attendance at the games. This thinking started in the 50’s. TV actually helped increase attendance in all of the major conferences in the 80’s when there were 2 games on television to how many games you can watch today.

In regards to Paterno and a eastern conference was concerned he wanted in the Big East basketball conference and when the conference turned down PSU and took Pitt that’s when he went to the Big Ten to get them into that conference. Essentially Paterno stabbed all of the eastern teams in the back.
 
In regards to Paterno and a eastern conference was concerned he wanted in the Big East basketball conference and when the conference turned down PSU and took Pitt that’s when he went to the Big Ten to get them into that conference. Essentially Paterno stabbed all of the eastern teams in the back.
Not to defend Paterno, but he tried to get the Eastern teams together, and he failed. PSU tried to get into the Big East, and were denied. So why did Paterno stab the eastern teams in the back if he was already rejected twice? What choice did he really have? PSU would have been nuts to turn down the Big Ten.

As I recall, Gavitt said when PSU was turned down that the conference would rue the day it happened. He was right.

PSU getting into the Big Ten turned out to be an enormous boon for them as we all know, and they helped the conference as well. It is an interesting thought experiment of how different it all could have been if there had been an eastern football conference. PSU was always going to be OK, but other eastern schools would probably have been better off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeftCoastPanther
Not to defend Paterno, but he tried to get the Eastern teams together, and he failed. PSU tried to get into the Big East, and were denied. So why did Paterno stab the eastern teams in the back if he was already rejected twice? What choice did he really have? PSU would have been nuts to turn down the Big Ten.

As I recall, Gavitt said when PSU was turned down that the conference would rue the day it happened. He was right.

PSU getting into the Big Ten turned out to be an enormous boon for them as we all know, and they helped the conference as well. It is an interesting thought experiment of how different it all could have been if there had been an eastern football conference. PSU was always going to be OK, but other eastern schools would probably have been better off.
The only one who's ever told the Gavitt "rue the day" line was the incompetent slime ball Mike Tranghese, so it's doubtful Gavitt ever said it. Also, Paterno's attempt at an Eastern Conference was basically a panic move after the Big East voted them down, had the Eastern schools actually come together and worked on an equal deal for everyone the conference might have happened. Paterno wanting to keep all their football money to themselves but equally split basketball money is why BC and Cuse pushed for Pitt's invite to the Big East.
 
Well, whatever truly happened, it worked out for them, and the rest of Eastern football is on the deathbed. We'd all be better off if they had gotten into the Big East.
 
A 10-team conference of Pitt, PSU, WVU, Syracuse, BC, Rutgers, Maryland, South Carolina, Miami and Louisville would have been pretty interesting. Louisville was awful in football in the early 80s but is needed for basketball. Miami needed money in the worst way for its football program despite building a future champion without the resources that other schools had.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT