From 1955-1965, Pitt went 5-5-1 against PSU. Literally dead even. Paterno is hired in 1966. PSU immediately wins 10 straight. It’s pretty straightforward. The college football world saw this as a flip being switched in Pennsylvania. Pitt deemphasized football like no program ever did in 1965. It required athletes to have two years of a foreign language, hence the garbage records from 1965-72. Majors wasn’t beating the Lions right away until he gathered some recruiting classes.
Now Pitt was an established football power at this time, so they weren’t just going to disappear overnight, but you could see the writing on the wall. Both programs were national powers in the 70’s and went toe to toe. Pitt deemphasized again in 1982 hoping Fazio could win being a Pitt guy and all. Hoping to win without a plan is a recipe for failure, which he did. Gottfried’s rebuild after Fazio was slow but he collected back-to-back top 5 recruiting classes and finally had his QB in place in 1989. Fired for being “difficult.”
But then 1981 happened, and both programs immediately went in opposite directions. Pitt would never recover, while PSU went on to play for 3 national championships over the next 5 years. See above. PSU also lost 3-plus games in five of the last seven seasons that decade. It also lost to Pitt in 1984, ‘87, ‘88 and Pitt had a late TD called back by a terrible call in 1989 from winning that one.
And the timing couldn’t have been worse for Pitt, as this was around the time that the Big Ten started looking east for expansion, and we all know how that played out.Pitt never fit the B10 mold and I’m sure the B10 is glad it never considered Pitt. I bet the Big East had buyer’s remorse with adding Pitt with its crummy hoops and facility before Howland arrived. Then there was BE football, which needed credibility and what did Pitt do? Deemphasized football again heading into the 1990s and drove a damn stake through the program. A repeat of 1965-72.
Any reasonable person can deduce that if PSU never hired Paterno, Pitt would have remained the sole football power in PA over the 70’s and 80’s. Think of the stars that PSU signed during that time, and imagine Pitt getting them instead. What would Pitt football have looked like in the 80’s? And who do think the Big Ten would have eyed for expansion? The university never would’ve allowed football to remain a power. If it cared it never would’ve let Sherrill walk or hired Fazio. Post WWII, Pitt has a history of knocking down something good. It just won’t allow athletics to be bigger than its mission statement.
Yes, Pitt has been steadily de-emphasizing football over the last few decades, but it isn’t due to some secret agenda, it’s because of the circumstances that they found themselves in. PSU grew into a powerhouse and Pitt just couldn’t compete anymore. Period. Pitt almost upset PSU in 1999 and did so in 2000. Pitt could have competed up until NIL. Now, no way.
Ask yourself this: If Pitt were invited to the B10 instead of PSU, do think the administration would have de-emphasized football? Do you see Rutgers or Northwestern de-emphasizing football? Or any P2 school, for that matter? If Pitt was invited, it would have more resources but would still mismanage the program because the school would never be all in. It just wants conference revenue checks and acting like it cares. If it cared, the past 43 years would look different. Actually, since 1938 would look different.