Why is ND allowed to pass interfere
- Thread starter Teh Teh
- Start date
Unfortunately, the officiating took an emotional toll on the team today. Narduzzi emphasized the need for the Panthers to start fast against the domers and the penalty calls and lack of calls negatively impacted the player's psyche. Another teaching moment for both coaches and players.
remember the boyd pass? That was obvious... the joke of an overturned catch... PI... the play in the endzone where the ND corner just pushed our WR right out of the endzone before the ball got there.
All... huge plays that would have netted us points.
All... huge plays that would have netted us points.
ND was very good at not being totally obvious about it and when they were not so good the refs decided not to do anything.
BS. What were the missed calls that resulted in ND scoring a TD 3 plays into the game? What did the officials have to do with us having to kick yet another FG in the red zone on our first possession, instead of scoring a TD? That's what Duzzi was talking about when he talked about needing to start fast. Get your D off the field, get yiir O in the end zone. After preaching starting fast all week, both the O and D laid eggs right out of the gate. That first ND possession and our first possession were way more deflating than anything the officials did or didn't do.
Horrible. Boyd had his jersey pulled on the fade pattern he couldn't quite reach. Ford had his head taken off on the diving catch they screwed him on. There was another time in the second half where there was blatant interference not called on consecutive pass plays that even the announcers commented on.
ND has the NCAA in their back pocket, to prove it, watch the replay of the game and jot down the holding calls, the wide receivers pushing off and most importantly the no call pass interference...
F'n ridiculous !
The refs were horse#it today! And to top it off on the play where Boyd got his jersey pulled the color guy on tv said it wasn't called because Boyd usually breaks free before that happens...So even they are blinded...ND's day to get hosed will come..Probably when it will hurt them the most...
Sean McDonough and Chris Spielman are not "Notre Dame announcers." They are ESPN/ABC college football announcers who move around every week. Do you even know who Spielman is? It would be laughable to suggest he's ND biased.
You have to be the dumbest man in here. You are say MCDONOUGH is not an Irish fan????? You are such a nit wit. How could you watch the ND love from before kickoff and not think "well the only reason they are here is because ND is the opponent"
If love to hear why Spielman would be a Pitt fan, please tell me.
I don't think you can even say that. They were blatantly obvious. It wasn't even debatable. The refs just gave Notre Dame the benefit of the doubt even when everyone could see they were wrong. So yes, basically the refs just decided not to do anything.
pitt defensive backs probably could have gotten away with it also, unfortunately none of them were ever close enough to will fuller, the best receiver on the field.
Just curious to pick your brain, what makes you think that? Every call or non-call the entire game goes Notre Dame's way, but you think Pitt would've gotten away with it? Not attacking you by any means, just curious as to how you think that. And I'll go on record and say this has nothing to do with them trying to hurt Pitt, it has everything to do with Notre Dame getting every break to go their way for years upon years now. That is not even debatable.
He's not.
Sean a Syracuse fan.
Spielman an Ohio state fan and former all American player.
You're wrong
just being facetious. nd does not get every call. in the 2004 game at nd pitt benefitted greatly from a bunch of pass interference calls on notre some, some questionable like yesterday. I just think this idea that notre dame or any team gets more calls than another purposely is silly.
Take your Golden Domer hat off for once. I enjoy the friendly banter, I don't mean to escalate this to anything more. However, it is the exact opposite of silly, it is the flat out truth. Questionable calls in '04? Please. You probably think the 2012 PI call was actually close, if you couldn't tell that was picture perfect coverage and nothing more, you have no idea what you're talking about. Not saying that's though, as I said I wish not to attack you personally, but it's hilarious to think Notre Dame does not get every single break and have for years.
Except the week before (as you've stated in another thread)? Why would that be an anomaly?
Do you think very many people if any bet on Temple that game? It's Vegas baby.
You reveal yourself to be more and more ignorant with every post. I wish I could resist calling out you and your twin Loaded so much, but I just can't. Some kind of personality defect I guess. Still beats being stupid.
Without having seen the actual number, my guess is that approximately the same amount of money was bet on Temple as was bet on Notre Dame. Because if it isn't the books adjust the lines in an effort to make it so. If the books set the line correctly they don't really care much one way or the other who wins, they will come out in the black either way. When there is a game with a ton of money bet on one team or the other the people who run the books do not like that at all. It leaves them open to losing a lot of money.
I believe they got an exemption from the NCAA. At least they didn't use their spurs when they saddled up our receivers, darn nice of 'em.
Yeah, that's a good point. Well, except for the fact that that was obviously the correct call. But close enough.
Probably could have been called PI, but again that's true in many/most plays and in both directions
It definitely wasn't a catch though, that part was 100% obvious as soon as they showed thhe replays
However, it was still a phenomenal play and a great effort by him
You're basically admitting to the problem. The refs missed a ton of penalties on Notre Dame, so you point to how few penalties there were. Maybe they would've missed 5 PI's on Pitt too, but they didn't, because Pitt's defenders weren't even anywhere near the ND receivers as they were wide open all day.
ND has had more penalties called on it this year than the opposition has had called on them.
ND has been penalized 50 times for 525 yards. Opponents have been penalized 48 times for 464 yards.
Hit the link and look down the team stats.
http://www.und.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2015-2016/teamcume.html
Just a question how wide open does fuller have to get to be not considered a penalty. your db were slow. what i saw was refs letting em play and if you want you could call a penalty against either side
