OT: Pedos lose their top recruiter and coach they just promoted
- Thread starter JokePa
- Start date
May daughter graduated from PSU in 2016, in four years, with a degree infinance. She had just over a 3.9 and had 4 job offers right out of school. She's not fat either.
School is a tool that you must use, most universities will be quite adequate if you make the most of your academic opportunities.
School is a tool that you must use, most universities will be quite adequate if you make the most of your academic opportunities.
Nearly every publication had Pitt over UPS lately. You make diploma mills, your numbers start suffering. Dilution.
Nobody in their right mind actually thinks Pedophile State is better than a school like Pitt, aside from delusional fans like yourself.
Ped St is what it is... diploma mill, huge state school with 700k alumni and 100% acceptance rate like the community colleges.
Nearly every except...the one that counts. Sounds like a lot of excuse making mixed in with some conspiracy theories. What about The Pitt News, do they have Pitt ahead of Penn State too?
Last edited:
Not nearly every publication. PSU is ranked higher by most other major rankings - Forbes, Time, and QS World Rankings. You're correct, however, that the US News is the most credible. Aside from ranking PSU higher overall, they rank PSU significantly higher in engineering, business, computer science, chemistry, math, and statistics. I didn't look, but I assume Pitt excels more in areas like communications and English.
Here's are the world's most notable college world rankings:
ARWU (China): Pitt 68, PSU 85
CWRU (UAE): Pitt 43, PSU 58
CWTS Leiden (Netherlands): Pitt 26, PSU 43
Nature Index (UK): PSU 52, Pitt 82
NTURanking (Taiwan): Pitt 23, PSU 73
QS Top Universities (UK): PSU 93, Pitt 142
Reuters' (UK): Pitt 30, PSU >100
RUR (Russia): Pitt 42, PSU 141
Scimago Institutions (Spain): Pitt 59, PSU 77
Times Higher Education (UK): PSU 77, Pitt 100
URAP (Turkey): Pitt 35, PSU 54
US News Global (US): Pitt 48, PSU 66
Most notable US specific rankings:
CMUP: Pitt 24, PSU 27
The Economist: Pitt 850, PSU 1047
Forbes: PSU 142, Pitt 154
Kiplinger's: Pitt 145, PSU 206
Money: PSU 233, PItt 331
NSF Total R&D: Pitt 17, PSU 21
Princeton Review Selectivity Rating: Pitt 91, PSU 89 (higher is better)
Princeton Review Academic Rating: Pitt 80, PSU 76 (higher is better)
US News: PSU 52, Pitt 68
Wall Street Journal: Pitt 75, PSU 125
Washington Monthly: Pitt 143, PSU 145
Credibility should also not be confused with popularity. In the US, the CMUP is easily the most credible within academia as a study of overall universities. Know your methodologies.
Last edited:
Lol. You have too much time on your hands, man.
"Know your methodologies". Relax, dude. No need to act like a tough guy.
US News:
Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs: PSU 20 Pitt 42
Best Business Schools: PSU 36 Pitt 53
Chemistry: PSU 21 Pitt 35
Comp Sci: PSU 29 Pitt 52
Physics: PSU 23 Pitt 50
Statistics: PSU 20 Pitt 50
Earth Sciences: PSU 6 Pitt 88
Math: PSU 28 Pitt 60
As stated already, Pitt starts to shine as we venture out into programs that don't require problem solving skills - humanities, journalism, arts, etc.
Bye now.
If you don't know or understand the methodologies of any ranking or comparison, then it is meaningless.
But it seems that you are only familiar with one publication or don't know how to use Google. If you want to get away from overall university comparisons that you were shown to be wrong about and just selectively list subject rankings of particular strength for your school, I can do that too.
Your assessment of Pitt is also completely wrong. While Pitt has strengths in some humanities like philosophy, international studies, and English, its forte is in the biological and health sciences. It is why it is top 10 in total federal research obligations and top 5 in NIH funding, which is almost entirely competitive peer reviewed funding and all problem solving based. Pitt is not an arts school. It doesn't even have a journalism major. Perhaps you should learn about a subject before making proclamations about it.
Last edited:
Seriously, guys? Who cares?! This is a FOOTBALL forum. Not the place to discuss academics, or even other sports, for that matter. This is about football, and in football, PSU has been running circles around us. Shifting the conversation to something else just makes us look salty as hell.
Good for them.... their slime ball football program also has a well earned reputation...their win at all cost mentality will continue to bring them more embarrassment than it will glory. Pitt is in a much better place than Ped St is believe me.
I don't even think YOU believe YOU. Threads like this REEK of Penn State envy.
Yes, we are all jealous of Pedophile State because their university and football program are so well respected...lmao.
Their Al Pacino HBO movie is about how everyone is jealous of them i guess?
Get your head out of your ass.
you're not a top 10 program, just a weak big 10. Play some good OOC teams. Back to you Dick
Guy looks to have a pretty strong resume when it comes to what Franklin hires for.
Not even close.
They are based on peer assessment surveys.
Guy looks to have a pretty strong resume when it comes to what Franklin hires for.
haha
sounds like a ped state fan to equate how good the school is or people with results on a football field
This is a football board.. hellooooo? Pitt has as good a chance as any next year
No bro, was referring to your last post referring to this
Here's are the world's most notable college world rankings:
ARWU (China): Pitt 68, PSU 85
CWRU (UAE): Pitt 43, PSU 58
CWTS Leiden (Netherlands): Pitt 26, PSU 43
Nature Index (UK): PSU 52, Pitt 82
NTURanking (Taiwan): Pitt 23, PSU 73
QS Top Universities (UK): PSU 93, Pitt 142
Reuters' (UK): Pitt 30, PSU >100
RUR (Russia): Pitt 42, PSU 141
Scimago Institutions (Spain): Pitt 59, PSU 77
Times Higher Education (UK): PSU 77, Pitt 100
URAP (Turkey): Pitt 35, PSU 54
US News Global (US): Pitt 48, PSU 66
Most notable US specific rankings:
CMUP: Pitt 24, PSU 27
The Economist: Pitt 850, PSU 1047
Forbes: PSU 142, Pitt 154
Kiplinger's: Pitt 145, PSU 206
Money: PSU 233, PItt 331
NSF Total R&D: Pitt 17, PSU 21
Princeton Review Selectivity Rating: Pitt 91, PSU 89 (higher is better)
Princeton Review Academic Rating: Pitt 80, PSU 76 (higher is better)
US News: PSU 52, Pitt 68
Wall Street Journal: Pitt 75, PSU 125
Washington Monthly: Pitt 143, PSU 145
No offense meant, wasnt calling you a nitwit, was saying dont sink to their level
Yeah, to make it less convoluted, the only one that matters is US News and World Report...
Perhaps at one time, PItt fans might have reason to be envious of Psu. However since the grand experiment has been exposed for what most pitt fans long knew it was (a slick marketing slogan) only those whose self esteem is primarily wrapped up around their schools football program would "envy" Psu. Most rational people would much rather be known as attending a really good school who has had some athletic success than attending a school where
1. many alumn are cult like in their adoration of a deeply flawed football coach and football program
2. Whose school valued the perception of their football program over young mens well being.
3. Will forever be known as the university that paid tens of millions of dollars to settle with victims of child abuse.
I'll take eternal mediocrity in football over the shame of going to a school where the fan base and administration looked the other way and then continued to trash the victims to salvage the image oc the program and dead coach
1. many alumn are cult like in their adoration of a deeply flawed football coach and football program
2. Whose school valued the perception of their football program over young mens well being.
3. Will forever be known as the university that paid tens of millions of dollars to settle with victims of child abuse.
I'll take eternal mediocrity in football over the shame of going to a school where the fan base and administration looked the other way and then continued to trash the victims to salvage the image oc the program and dead coach
Except that isn't true. Stay in your wheelhouse, whatever that is.
Last edited:
I agree with what you are saying, but Narduzzi jumped at the chance to leave the school with the biggest child molesting, train riding scandal in the history of humanity. He is one toxic cover upper. They all knew.
Well true the US news global rankings have Pitt way ahead, but neither of these matters.
With the US news and world report, one of the main criteria is alumni giving. When you know psu has one of the biggest alumni numbers of any school and the giving is so many times more than Pitt... that the other criteria makes Pitt that much more better academically than the morally bankrupt nitwits.
Narduzzi never worked at Penn State.
Hahahahaha, he worked at someplace much much worse. You need to buck up for cable tv! Lol! Rumor has it that there are going to be plenty of Narduzzi Knew shirts at Heinz Field. You should buy one to fit in!
Last edited:
Penn State is the worst football scandal in the history of sports. It was a cesspool, and the head coach covered up child rape in HIS OWN LOCKER ROOM!
There will never be another penn state scandal. MSU is more a gymnastic scandal
Explain that to the six year olds, or the students who gang raped by the train. Let me know how that works out for you. Oh, and Narduzzi knew, they all knew...
Oh. You are a penn state troll.
Now it makes sense. What is wrong with your school that you have to go on a Pitt web site and make Pitt names and talk trash? Your life must be really sad, I mean other than being a penn state fan, even more so.
Not what is wrong with Penn State, but what is wrong with Michigan State and everyone who came from that rape factory.
Ah, so the Ironhead moniker was banned, so you picked another great Pitt running back.
Ohh dont worry we have cable...and the WORLD will be watching the Pedophile State, Joe knew movie in disgust next month!! Hahahahhahah!
