What is your point? Pitt was lucky to find a home, but they were much more attractive then, than UCF is now.
Exposing? You have to be an absolute idiot to not understand the P5 is the product and to "sound off" about the "ESP5N Cartel".
There is no such thing as the BCS. The poll who rated you "#1" also ranked Alabama "#1" after they lost to Clemson head to head in the national championship. It is a joke. It is hilarious any UCF fan would think it is legitimate and it is pathetic, with a playoff, your school claimed it. It is the absolute pinnacle of little brother syndrome to claim that and scream about how it legitimizes UCF.
also UCF beat more ranked teams than bama did last year in the regular season. So SoS is a weak argument in relation to the 2017 season.
UCF schedule this year is weak but it'll get better when USF and Memphis get properyly ranked. Takes G5 teams a lot longer to get ranked.
Could say the same about Clemson? When? When they won the (real, not fake) National Championship? They won the playoff and beat #20 Louisville, #8 FSU, #16 VT, #3 Ohio State, and #2 Alabama along the way.
when they are going to make the playoffs this year without beating a ranked team
was primarily responding to the poster who said UCF isn't going to play a good team all year but I'd contend USF or Memphis are as good or better than any you listed. And theres certainly a shot Clemson is in the same boat. Both UCF and Clemson may finish the year unbeaten without playing a ranked team.
Alabama beat 4 ranked teams last year to win the National Championship. They also beat teams week after week who were almost all better than the "ranked" opponents UCF beat. Hell, Fresno State would have probably been the best team UCF played. UCF beat Memphis and USF, who, in turn, beat no one. Memphis' best win was over 6-7 UCLA. USF's best win was over 6-7 Texas Tech in a meaningless bowl game. Those schools were ranked simply because they played terrible schedules and piled up wins.
I would contend USF or Memphis are better than NC State. I am using top 25 as a metric because its generally an agreed upon ranking of teams. Since there is no top 50 or top 75 hard to tell the difference between two top 50 teams not in the top 25.
That is unlikely, but it could happen. Guess what? They will still have played a much harder schedule than UCF.
wrong. Bama beat 2 ranked teams in the regular season, UCF beat 3. I like how top 25 wins are always used by p5 homers until it doesn't work in their favor. Bama didn't even beat a top 15 team in the regular season.
not really actually. ACC is full of bottom feeder cupcakes this year and Clemson is going to feast on em as would UCF.
That isn't wrong. What I said is absolutely true. UCF beat only Memphis and USF. UCF beat Memphis a 2nd time in post season play to win the AAC. Neither of those teams were any good. They didn't beat anyone either.
pitt is a much, much worse job than UCF right now.
It is wrong, UCF beat more ranked teams than bama did. Bama got in playoffs anyway, despite not even winning their dvision, beating no top 15 teams (LSu and Miss State only top 25 wins). UCF was never afforded the chance to beat clemson in the playoffs, which they probably would have (read Bill Connelly's S&P for reasons why).
lol sensitive much? WE have to hear all offseason UCF plays no one. Clemson is goign to cruise into the playoffs this year despite beating zero ranked teams. UCF beat 3 last year. 3 > 0. The hypocrisy is insufferable.
next opponent on our schedule. Football is King in florida, don't worry after saturday you guys probably won't ever hear from us again
nc state? they beat a 1-AA by 9. Duke would be a challenge but outside of that the rest of your list are sub par compared to Memphis or USF.
ok lets see who your next HC is. I understand ACC is a better conference but Pitt is a dead end football job. Coach there for a few years and get fired.
