ADVERTISEMENT

The Narduzzi Contract

The baseline for Pitt football for me is 8-4 in the regular season. Narduzzi has...

8 wins - 3 of 9 seasons (potential for a 4th)
7 or fewer wins - 4 of 9 seasons (potential for a 5th)
9 or more wins - 2 of 9 seasons

Narduzzi has been a good coach for Pitt and he's taken this program forward from Chryst. It also feels like he's maxed out his potential has has Pitt on the fall.

Ive seen some horrible

Do you guys think its “gameday coaching” if you have a backup Oline, a backup QB, 4th string RBs playing, and not getting results?

The defense has a few good (one great) playmakers, but lots of gaps.

7-4 is about what this team is. Great QB play pulled out a couple wins early, to offset a couple games recently that we let slip away.

I didn’t love the effort at SMU or Louisville - but it snowballed because they are better.

Need to get the NIL machine firing. Need more depth of talent, not a half dozen really good players and MAC level otherwise.

Ive seen some horrible

Any 7-5 finish in modern major college football, where you schedule at least 2 tomato cans every year, is a failure. If you have 2 bad years in a row, you should be coaching for your job the next year. If he loses these next 2, Narduzzi will need to win 8 games minimum next season to avoid the ax.
I wouldn't call 7-5 a failure, it's straight up average. Go .500 in conference and against the two tougher OOC games, win the 2 cream puffs gets you to 7-5. To you're point, it's no different than finishing 7-9 or 8-8 in the NFL every year which is considered unacceptable.

Cannot understate the importance of these next 3 games

If you’ll forgive my intrusion, I saw Wisconsin mentioned. UW typically schedules tough in the noncon. Last year, they lost to TN, @Prov, and @AZ, but also beat Marquette, and UVa and SMU in a holiday tournament. That gives you all kinds of leeway. The risk of this type of scheduling is losing them all. MSU almost had this happen to them, but then blew out Baylor in their last opportunity.

The point about conference strength isn’t wrong. I didn’t realize the weakness (perceived or real) of the ACC. People like me only look at the strength at the top which is championship worthy. The B10 may not get a single team to the second weekend, but there’s currently 15 teams #52 or higher on Torvik. That makes a .500 record in conference pretty safe (assuming a one or two noncon Q2 or better wins).

I think you’re right to want at least one of the next three - today may be the best chance, because the other two are true road games. UW had its clunker on Monday, so I won’t say they’re due for that, but I think you’re favored for a reason.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT