Islanderpanther said:

It’s not your money, so mind your own business! And anything that would boost the program is worth pursuing. 99 and a half percent of the universities in the ncaa have their own stadium on campus for very good reasons…and you in your infinite lack of wisdom play the yinzer card.

Click to expand...

pittmeister said:

Reality check:

*SMU is a good football team. Better than Pitt. It is by far the best team they faced so far this year. Their only loss was to a top 10 team (BYU). They have better players, period.

*Did you really think they would go undefeated? If you did then you are delusional. I predicted Pitt would lose this game a couple of weeks ago.

*Yes it was a bad showing. However, is Pitt that much better than Syracuse? I don’t think so. The wheels came off early and Syracuse couldn’t recover. It happens.

*The team got humbled. Maybe that’s a good thing. After the big win against Syracuse they may have gotten full of themselves.

*Some of you need to get a grip. Take a look at some other schools with more money and better players; USC, FSU, Michigan, Clemson, all are having disappointing seasons

Did you miss #10 Texas A&M getting spanked 44-20 last night by unranked South Carolina???

Click to expand...

Sean Miller Fan said:

SMU is SEC good. We can analyze this inside and out but SMU is really really good. Its a team that could mess around and end up playing for the Natty. They were more talented than us at every single position on the field.

Click to expand...