A damning indictment on Narduzzi and Cignetti
- Thread starter HailToPitt725
- Start date
How long till we find out it’s a damning indictment of NIL
Let’s face it we have no idea how much this unregulated mess has screwed shit up behind the scenes
And the NCAA is completely gutless on doing anything like set up a framework or … basic rules …
I remember them going after players for free tattoos… lol… fun times
Let’s face it we have no idea how much this unregulated mess has screwed shit up behind the scenes
And the NCAA is completely gutless on doing anything like set up a framework or … basic rules …
I remember them going after players for free tattoos… lol… fun times
It's much easier to look good in practice than in a game. In practice you can look the part. The true test is in game conditions. We've see all of them play and the only one that hasn't flinched so far is Yarnell. He has shown a lot in two starts.
I believe the coaches have something to work with in Yarnell. Jurkovec and CV have had multiple starts under their belts and they've looked worse with each start.
yes and no..
It just depends on how the practice/drill/period is scripted and what the expectations of those situations are.
There are such things as "success" periods in practice where the offense or the defense has the advantage and those are minimum standard evaluation times where you better be able to execute under those conditions and if you can't, you're going to have a hard time moving up the ladder. On the flipside, there are situations in practice that are chaotic where the offense or the defense aren't expected to be "great" in terms of outcomes. In those scenarios, you might not see a run pop for big yardage or QB be able to complete a pass. But, you hope to see the OL utilize their blocking rules and technique. You hope to see the QB make the right decision on a pass. These periods are invaluable because your trying to make things stressful in order to have gameday not be stressful.
Most coaches make an evaluation of both scenarios and try to project where a player is on the depth chart. When things are equal or close, coaches use a variety of reasons to justify the depth chart - experience, leadership, ceiling, and nowadays NIL has come into fold.
Yarnell's performance against BC was good but is only 1 data point this year. I'm going to wait and see what he does against Duke and, if he's the starter next year, what he does against a couple of teams other than sacrificial lambs. It's premature to judge Nate on just this one game and what he did in one game previously.
He had a run game because he could pass. His completion percentage was good, and he threw downfield. A 60 yard td reception to show for it, too. And he could run to keep them honest, too. And could look off receivers and go through his progressions. A lot of positives
This is one of the funniest and most ridiculous things I've ever read on this board. There is no way in hell they're paying mid 6 figures to PJ. None, zero, zilch, nada.
ok, here's my super fanboy thought....
We win against Duke, Narduzzi seems to always do well against them. Plus Yarnel is following the Pickett path, sat behind two struggling QB's until finally getting his chance in the last two games to put a positive ending to the season and create some hope for the next year.
I don’t remember that lol. Palko played at Pitt Stadium?? I must’ve been in a coma 😂
It had to be a lot easier for Palko because he had Curtis Martin running behind Stepnoski, Fralic, Grimm and May.
John Turman was the QB in 1999 when Pitt beat ND 37-27, I believe. Just going by memory. I also recall that David Priestley was the backup QB. Palko never played at Pitt Stadium.
I can't believe how many people still don't know what's going on in this thread...... LOL. It's fascinating, and yet so hilarious.
Even my 12 year old thought this thread was hilarious. He said he remembered reading a thread similar to this on the Frank Sokol board during the Foge era.
The simple answer is no. Pitt beat Louisville in Pittsburgh. After the game, CV got to conduct the Pitt band.
I think you have CV confused with Roman Maroni. And he didn't conduct the Pitt band. He was deported to Sweden.
