$1m in 2 months. Not a bad start.
You really can't help yourself, can you?Hopefully they give it all to Meleek Thomas 🏀. We can suck another year at football without paying decent NIL.
I am no SMF fan, but his sentiment is accurate. In terms of NIL money, $1 million is nothing in the grand scheme of things for a team, let alone a whole athletic department (numerous Pitt teams will split this). Even if it was football alone, that is still peanuts compared to what 20ish so schools (I know it is not the school itself, but you know what I am saying) are paying out to just a few football players let alone the whole team. Yet people want me to get excited because Pitt has $1 million in 2 months to split among football, men's basketball and I am assuming women's basketball, and maybe even a volleyball player or something just as absurd?You really can't help yourself, can you?
It is mistaken to believe this $1m campaign is the full amount raised for the year. Collectives are also not charitable contributions so that really isn't analogous. They are flat out an attempt to buy wins. It is really no different than the overly romanticized (by some) "old Golden Panther" days of the early 1980s funneling money to players. The defeatist attitude you demonstrate, however, is one that could help result in Pitt athletics being left out of a top athletics tier, because like it or not, it is where all of Pitt's aspirational peer and actual peer competitors are.I am no SMF fan, but his sentiment is accurate. In terms of NIL money, $1 million is nothing in the grand scheme of things for a team, let alone a whole athletic department (numerous Pitt teams will split this). Even if it was football alone, that is still peanuts compared to what 20ish so schools (I know it is not the school itself, but you know what I am saying) are paying out to just a few football players let alone the whole team. Yet people want me to get excited because Pitt has $1 million in 2 months to split among football, men's basketball and I am assuming women's basketball, and maybe even a volleyball player or something just as absurd?
That is tough to get excited about. Before you ask, I did not, nor do I plan on contributing to the fund as it is throwing good money at bad money. Pitt will never fundraise in a way to compete truly. My charitable money is much better going to Vets, Cancer, and Kids causes, rather than to help pay to acquire the 50th best QB to go to Pitt for a year, you realize it is a yearly "salary" right? If they succeed beyond that "salary", and become the 10th best QB, unlike the NFL where they are locked in a contract for X years (generally 3-4 years), you need to come up with way more money to keep them. That is how silly NIL is.
Paco I hear what your saying. I really truly do. But I have to live in reality. I live a comfortable life I'm not poor, but I'm not super Uber wealthy either. So for me to give to this Pitt fund, it would come from my charity giving fund, no matter how the IRS views it. I'm sure most people are in the same boat, and spend their charity fund money for theses. In that sense, it is analogous for my purpose.Collectives are not charitable contributions so that really isn't analogous. They are flat out an attempt to buy wins. It is really no different than the overly romanticized (by some) "old Golden Panther" days of the early 1980s funneling money to players. The defeatist attitude you demonstrate, however, is one that could help result in Pitt athletics being left behind, because like it or not, it is where all of Pitt's competitors are.
1. This was a campaign goal. "Pitt can't raise NIL money!" Well, they met their goal. It's actually a good thing.Paco I hear what your saying. I really truly do. But I have to live in reality. I live a comfortable life I'm not poor, but I'm not super Uber wealthy either. So for me to give to this Pitt fund, it would come from my charity giving fund, no matter how the IRS views it. I'm sure most people are in the same boat, and spend their charity fund money for theses. In that sense, it is analogous for my purpose.
I was a kid during the Golden Panther days but my older brother was actually a walk on and friends with great many players on those late 80 teams. The cost of doing business back then was a car during recruiting and a few thousand a season. That got you that player for 4/5 years.
With NIL the cost of an average QB is $150k person. If they light it up it goes to $500k-$1million per season. Addison left Pitt for $200k a season.
you say I have a defeatist attitude and maybe I do. But what in Pitts history suggest they will be able to keep with the Jones at those numbers? I have to be realist and say "nothing suggest they will. So my good money will become bad money."
Collectives are just that: collections of fans from all manner of economic backgrounds banding together to try to affect an outcome which they mutually desire. Some give $10s of dollars, some 10s of thousands. Let's be clear, in no world, including the IRS', is putting money into an NIL collective remotely the same as supporting Pittsburgh Children's free care fund. I can go down a more circuitous route of how Pitt being competitive in major college athletics is good for the economy of Western PA, good for the university as an institution, etc, etc, which I believe to actually be true. But lets be real, it isn't the same as giving time or money to a local food bank.Paco I hear what your saying. I really truly do. But I have to live in reality. I live a comfortable life I'm not poor, but I'm not super Uber wealthy either. So for me to give to this Pitt fund, it would come from my charity giving fund, no matter how the IRS views it. I'm sure most people are in the same boat, and spend their charity fund money for theses. In that sense, it is analogous for my purpose.
I was a kid during the Golden Panther days but my older brother was actually a walk on and friends with great many players on those late 80 teams. The cost of doing business back then was a car during recruiting and a few thousand a season. That got you that player for 4/5 years.
With NIL the cost of an average QB is $150k person. If they light it up it goes to $500k-$1million per season. Addison left Pitt for $200k a season.
you say I have a defeatist attitude and maybe I do. But what in Pitts history suggest they will be able to keep with the Jones at those numbers? I have to be realist and say "nothing suggest they will. So my good money will become bad money."
It's a start. You have to start somewhere.I am no SMF fan, but his sentiment is accurate. In terms of NIL money, $1 million is nothing in the grand scheme of things for a team, let alone a whole athletic department (numerous Pitt teams will split this). Even if it was football alone, that is still peanuts compared to what 20ish so schools (I know it is not the school itself, but you know what I am saying) are paying out to just a few football players let alone the whole team. Yet people want me to get excited because Pitt has $1 million in 2 months to split among football, men's basketball and I am assuming women's basketball, and maybe even a volleyball player or something just as absurd?
That is tough to get excited about. Before you ask, I did not, nor do I plan on contributing to the fund as it is throwing good money at bad money. Pitt will never fundraise in a way to compete truly. My charitable money is much better going to Vets, Cancer, and Kids causes, rather than to help pay to acquire the 50th best QB to go to Pitt for a year, you realize it is a yearly "salary" right? If they succeed beyond that "salary", and become the 10th best QB, unlike the NFL where they are locked in a contract for X years (generally 3-4 years), you need to come up with way more money to keep them. That is how silly NIL is.
Can they just use the money for volleyball and soccer players to win a championship before it's too late? Not going to help much for football.
Its not going to help much for football, but 1-2 guys could help immensely for basketball. I am kinda upset we re-signed Bartholomew. Dont need to pay him to go 5-7 next year. Spend it on basketball. There's a Top 5 NBA pick living 10 miles from Oakland
I mean really, just go and get some really, really good volleyball and soccer players. Not that those teams aren't good, but they can be even better. Of course, we will wait until every other teams does if first and go .500 for the next 20 years.
College Volleyball NIL Rankings
A ranking of College Volleyball recruits. These rankings are based on the potential influence they have as an individual.www.on3.com
What a stupid statement and position to hold. Like no other opinions matter.If you are not investing in Alliance 412 you seriously need to stfu . And yes i contribute to both 412 and the panther club
Well, they matter less. There is no way around that. People that aren't supporting the athletic department through the university or Alliance 412...their opinions are not heard by those that matter so they do matter A LOT less than the opinions of people involved in the active support of athletics.What a stupid statement and position to hold. Like no other opinions matter.
Again I hear what your saying but you are not entirely right. Not sending money is a loud message too. That one of Pitt (and the Pirates) biggest problem. They never look to see why their base is not as charitable to their sports teams compared to other institutions. I'm sure being a urban school plays a significant role, but that is not the full story either.Well, they matter less. There is no way around that. People that aren't supporting the athletic department through the university or Alliance 412...their opinions are not heard by those that matter so they do matter A LOT less than the opinions of people involved in the active support of athletics.
And of course fans that actually care enough to support athletics generally don't place as much weight on the opinions of anonymous message board posters that don't. That's just common sense.
You did not have to explain yourself. you are certainly not the only one who feels this way.Again I hear what your saying but you are not entirely right. Not sending money is a loud message too. That one of Pitt (and the Pirates) biggest problem. They never look to see why their base is not as charitable to their sports teams compared to other institutions. I'm sure being a urban school plays a significant role, but that is not the full story either.
It's a moot point anyways. We each believe and act accordingly and neither of us are going to change each other's view.
Not Pitt specific, but NIL is out of control. The players went from no power to way too much power. College football/basketball need to figure out a solution.
This is true but that doesn't change the landscape. Until this all levels out or a court says otherwise, you have to either try to stay on the map or be willing to deal with the consequences of dropping off of it. I think Pitt has reasoned that it's probably better to try to play along for a while because doing otherwise probably dooms you to irrelevancy once the deck starts to get shuffled again. Yeah, Olympic sports are generally doing well enough but the football and basketball programs will drag you right down into the void because those are the programs that ultimately determine your fate.Not Pitt specific, but NIL is out of control. The players went from no power to way too much power. College football/basketball need to figure out a solution.
You did not have to explain yourself. you are certainly not the only one who feels this way.
Not one penny for NIL. The idea of paying for play is abhorrent to me.
I've supported Pitt athletics for 40 years only to be told that it is never enough or that our alumni and general fanbase are cheap. Now we have another black hole to throw good money after bad.
Those who feel otherwise can open up their wallet (again).
Ok. Thanks for the advice.For you guys that don't want to contribute $5 or $10 to the pay for play fund, I would recommend you find another sport to follow. This is a pro sport now. The model is that we have to pay the players' salaries. I hate that. You hate that. Everyone hates it but that's where this sport is. If you want Pitt to be good, you have to help pay the players. I wished that wasnt the case but it is.
Thanks. Appreciate the advice. But I’ll continue to follow and watch and will never give a penny. If I decide to done $5 or $10 or multiples I’ll find more worthy things to give me money to. I’d never ever get far enough down the list to an NIL fund no matter how much money I ever have and donate. Including winning the lottery (fantasy I know but making the point).For you guys that don't want to contribute $5 or $10 to the pay for play fund, I would recommend you find another sport to follow. This is a pro sport now. The model is that we have to pay the players' salaries. I hate that. You hate that. Everyone hates it but that's where this sport is. If you want Pitt to be good, you have to help pay the players. I wished that wasnt the case but it is.
Ok. Thanks for the advice.
FWIW, I am trying to do my best to do more sports and follow less. I am adding fishing and cycling this year.
I will quit Pitt Athletics on my timetable. Promise not to bitch (as if I ever) about it. Now those of you who can't/won't push back, open your wallet.
Not buying tickets or contributing sends absolutely no message. Pitt athletics doesn't know you exist. That was true a decade ago. It is true now. It will be true a decade from now.Again I hear what your saying but you are not entirely right. Not sending money is a loud message too. That one of Pitt (and the Pirates) biggest problem. They never look to see why their base is not as charitable to their sports teams compared to other institutions. I'm sure being a urban school plays a significant role, but that is not the full story either.
It's a moot point anyways. We each believe and act accordingly and neither of us are going to change each other's view.
Not Pitt specific, but NIL is out of control. The players went from no power to way too much power. College football/basketball need to figure out a solution.
Because that is 100% the case. And their complaints are shouting at clouds.I've always found that the people that complain the most contribute the least.
It’s a start. Pony up or shut up.
I disagree. Opinions are like AHs. Money talks, BS walks.What a stupid statement and position to hold. Like no other opinions matter.
If you are not investing in Alliance 412 you seriously need to stfu . And yes i contribute to both 412 and the panther club
We are all looking forward to your 15,000 word post questioning how the funds are allocated… or do you only do that with THON?
We are all looking forward to your 15,000 word post questioning how the funds are allocated… or do you only do that with THON
No it is something much much worse than dubious charities.Alliance 412: not a charity.
NIL is more accurate than a “charity “ that says one thing but gives money another wayWe are all looking forward to your 15,000 word post questioning how the funds are allocated… or do you only do that with THON?
It’s actually using the money for the purpose of the donation , unlike THONNo it is something much much worse than dubious charities.
Well we won’t be getting an annual report from this Collective so there’s no way to make that statement definitively.It’s actually using the money for the purpose of the donation , unlike THON
The 412 Alliance isn’t promising to care for children with life threatening illnesses, what they do with their money is 100% their business . Hopefully they use it as the donors intend them to do .Well we won’t be getting an annual report from this Collective so there’s no way to make that statement definitively.
BTW, and for the record, I’m glad Pitt has this NIL effort. It’s just funny how some on here are quick to criticize charities with actual systems of oversight, but won’t question if any misappropriation is happening in these “Wild West” collectives.
The 412 Alliance isn’t promising to care for children with life threatening illnesses, what they do with their money is 100% their business . Hopefully they use it as the donors intend them to do .