No. Savage will be Romo's new #2. He will not be the new #1 until Romo is hurt in week 2 or 3.So Savage is the new #1 and Nate dodges a bullet?
LOL
or he could have been drummed out of the league and facing felony charges after knocking him out cold....what is it they say about discretion in regards to valor?There should have been red flags on Osweiler when that video surfaced of him leaving a pizza joint in Scottsdale and some crew tried for autographs and photos and some lame punk pushed Osweiler in the back and Brock and his two female friends just took off running to an SUV.
That or Osweiler having no shoulders and looking extremely gangly in a rough-ass sport.
or he could have been drummed out of the league and facing felony charges after knocking him out cold....what is it they say about discretion in regards to valor?
yep, he could have gone with the punch to the shoulder....he may suck football wise but he made the right call here.Please, standing up for yourself doesn't equate to having to knock someone out cold. He's soft and gangly, i.e., he stinks.
No. Savage will be Romo's new #2. He will not be the new #1 until Romo is hurt in week 2 or 3.
Savage is not starter material...but apparently, Peterman is? Not sure the Texans strategy at this point is to go with a bevy of borderline Pitt grad transfer QBs to build their franchise upon. Odd business modelThen Savage gets hurt in week 5 and they start Brandon Weeden for the rest of the season.
If I'm the Texans I sign Romo and draft Peterman. Savage is not starter material and they will need to start grooming Romo's replacement immediately given his fragility. If I'm Peterman I'm hoping for that scenario over backing up Glennon in Chicago.
Saw somewhere Browns not keeping Osweiler, kind of an NBA version of sign and trade
Savage is not starter material...but apparently, Peterman is? Not sure the Texans strategy at this point is to go with a bevy of borderline Pitt grad transfer QBs to build their franchise upon. Odd business model
He could very well be. He's a good bit more suited to be an NFL QB than Savage. I like Savage but he has been very prone to injury, though he was OK when he played last year. Peterman makes sense for a team looking for a starter 2-3 years down the road.
Yeah, the Browns basically bought a draft pick for $16 million dollars.
Makes AB's contact look pretty affordable.
This is part of the Analysis of Nate from the official NFL Draft Combine website:I think best case for Nate is to be a quality number 2. He's good but I don't think he's "franchise QB" good or even second tier starter good. Just my uninformed opinion.
They would have had to pay out salary dollars anyway and they may be able to eat some of that money and get another late round pick from someone. I wouldn't even be shocked to see him included back to the Patriots in a Garapolo deal with the Browns eating a large portion of that salary.Yeah, the Browns basically bought a draft pick for $16 million dollars.
Makes AB's contact look pretty affordable.
He's a good bit more suited to be an NFL QB than Savage.........why is that? Being shorter with a weaker arm? I'll admit the hot wives are kind of a wash in the comparison though.He could very well be. He's a good bit more suited to be an NFL QB than Savage. I like Savage but he has been very prone to injury, though he was OK when he played last year. Peterman makes sense for a team looking for a starter 2-3 years down the road.
Watch out, but the Browns are doing something.
I think moneyball is going to sneak into it eventually the same way it did in baseball and basketball. The old guard on NFL Countdown had no idea what they were talking about, they didn't even know what they really traded for in the beginning. I see it as a low risk, high reward deal. Then again, it's the Browns so we'll see what happens.If I had a nickel for every time I read that...
They're trying to play moneyball with football. Call me skeptical but making moves to bring Kenny Britt in to lowball or eventually jettison TP looks good on paper but doesn't make sense from the football side.
Whatever the Browns should do - they will do the opposite. It's the Browns.
I think moneyball is going to sneak into it eventually the same way it did in baseball and basketball.
I really don't understand why. He's not great, but probably the best qb to actually be on a browns roster since they got the new team in '99. Maybe a couple of the flash in the pan guys like Kelly Holcomb or Derek Anderson, other than that complete garbage at the qb position for more than 15 years.Saw somewhere Browns not keeping Osweiler, kind of an NBA version of sign and trade
He's a good bit more suited to be an NFL QB than Savage.........why is that? Being shorter with a weaker arm? I'll admit the hot wives are kind of a wash in the comparison though.