ADVERTISEMENT

Caveats

Zaratoughda

Redshirt
Nov 12, 2009
982
86
28
It really felt good rising up and blowing Davidson off the court but... thinking about things a bit..

It was really like the Duquense Dukes all over again.

Both teams were guard intensive teams, with their guards doing most of their scoring, and in both cases they had one guard that would do it all while the other, was an outstanding 3ball shooter but could not take it to the hoop.

So, James Robinson has excellent defensive technique but not outstanding athleticism so Dixon but James on the 3ball shooter and.... James took the guy out of the game. Micah Mason for the Dukes and then Sullivan for Davidson. Mason was 4-11 shooting and 2-6 from 3ball land for just 11 points, while Sullivan was just 2-13 and 2-8 from 3ball land for just 8 points. So, ya gotta give Robinson credit for this (Len Elmore thought it was Chris Jones... good grief) and Dixon for setting up this strategy in both games.

Otherwise, we just kept their 'do it all' guards and the rest of their team from dominating... had a length and size advantage over both of them.... and took it to them offensively... scoring 96 against the Dukes and 94 against Davidson.

The caveat?? We are not gonna get the favorable matchups against most teams like we did against the Dukes and Davidson. Purdue, for example, was HUGE (bigs at 300 and 260) and we had a real tough time against them... where it was US that ran out of gas and not the other team.

The OTHER thing... after the game Dixon commented about having had four days to prepare for this game and... we have done well when he has gotten more time before (Gonzaga) but most of the time he is not gonna be able to have that level of preparation.

However... the thing that *I* am pleased with (other than getting the 25 point W) is Sterling Smith and the bench played much better than they have been playing. Smith was 4-5 from 3 ball land for 12 points and was the main man covering Gibbs. Jones, taking it aggressively to the hoop whenever he got a chance, was excellent off the bench. Jeter, Slim and Nelson-Ododa also were pluses off the bench.

To me, this is critical as we were starting to look like a 4 man team and you are not gonna go very far with just 4 players that are worth their salt in the rotation.

So, like a lot of posters on this board, I am optimistic looking down the road here... particularly looking at the game at ND and, possibly, the one at Ville.

But... next up... WC... and then Cuse comes to town.
 
Last edited:
It really felt good rising up and blowing Davidson off the court but... thinking about things a bit..

It was really like the Duquense Dukes all over again.

Both teams were guard intensive teams, with their guards doing most of their scoring, and in both cases they had one guard that would do it all while the other, was an outstanding 3ball shooter but could not take it to the hoop.

So, James Robinson has excellent defensive technique but not outstanding athleticism so Dixon but James on the 3ball shooter and.... James took the guy out of the game. Micah Mason for the Dukes and then Sullivan for Davidson. Mason was 4-11 shooting and 2-6 from 3ball land for just 11 points, while Sullivan was just 2-13 and 2-8 from 3ball land for just 8 points. So, ya gotta give Robinson credit for this (Len Elmore thought it was Chris Jones... good grief) and Dixon for setting up this strategy in both games.

Otherwise, we just kept their 'do it all' guards and the rest of their team from dominating... had a length and size advantage over both of them.... and took it to them offensively... scoring 96 against the Dukes and 94 against Davidson.

The caveat?? We are not gonna get the favorable matchups against most teams like we did against the Dukes and Davidson. Purdue, for example, was HUGE (bigs at 300 and 260) and we had a real tough time against them... where it was US that ran out of gas and not the other team.

The OTHER thing... after the game Dixon commented about having had four days to prepare for this game and... we have done well when he has gotten more time before (Gonzaga) but most of the time he is not gonna be able to have that level of preparation.

However... the thing that *I* am pleased with (other than getting the 25 point W) is Sterling Smith and the bench played much better than they have been playing. Smith was 4-5 from 3 ball land for 12 points and was the main man covering Gibbs. Jones, taking it aggressively to the hoop whenever he got a chance, was excellent off the bench. Jeter, Slim and Nelson-Ododa also were pluses off the bench.

To me, this is critical as we were starting to look like a 4 man team and you are not gonna go very far with just 4 players that are worth their salt in the rotation.

So, like a lot of posters on this board, I am optimistic looking down the road here... particularly looking at the game at ND and, possibly, the one at Ville.

But... next up... MES... and then Cuse comes to town.

We would have been OK against Purdue but the big back up center [name escapes me] had a monster second half. We had no answer and I don't know if any big is going to go off like that again this year.
 
We would have been OK against Purdue but the big back up center [name escapes me] had a monster second half. We had no answer and I don't know if any big is going to go off like that again this year.

Hammons (7'0" and 260) is the senior and the starter at C for them last year... and is probably the better player. They are still starting Hass (7'2" and 297) there though and I am not sure why.

I checked the box on their loss to Butler and it appears they lost that game.... by giving the ball up 10 more times than Butler on turnovers and another 3 in OR. That's 13 more shots and that made the difference in that game. Swanigan, their 260 pound recruit at PF, had 25 points and 11 rebounds but turned the ball over 7 times.
 
Hammons was suspended the first few games of their season, Hass played well in his absence, and they've rolled with Hass there ever since.

Hammons is the better player, IMO. He's been hyped as a first round talent for a couple of years but just had a mix of off-court questions and some makeup concerns surrounding effort and desire and inconsistency.

He's a senior now so probably not a first-rounder this season but I think he has a good shot at being a solid 2nd rounder who makes an NBA roster pretty comfortably.
 
They are averaging about the same MPG and about the same PPG, but Hammons is pulling in 8 RPG and Haas jut 5.4 RPG. Hammons is also 3-3 from 3 point land (Haas hasn't tried).

Hammons might still be an NBA first rounder. You can't teach size.
 
Hammons (7'0" and 260) is the senior and the starter at C for them last year... and is probably the better player. They are still starting Hass (7'2" and 297) there though and I am not sure why.

I checked the box on their loss to Butler and it appears they lost that game.... by giving the ball up 10 more times than Butler on turnovers and another 3 in OR. That's 13 more shots and that made the difference in that game. Swanigan, their 260 pound recruit at PF, had 25 points and 11 rebounds but turned the ball over 7 times.

I don't know but I don't think we will see a team with that much size again this year.
 
I don't know but I don't think we will see a team with that much size again this year.

Well... I was thinking FSU might be that bad so I checked them out and... big Boris Boja is starting at C for them and is not playing many minutes.... and otherwise they are starting 4 players listed as 'guards'. Two of them are freshman and leading their team in scoring at around 17.5 PPG each.

So, yeah, hopefully we will not have to face Purdue again this year.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT