Well, he made a great catch, he has some speed, just not enough. Maybe if he didnt get facemasked he wouldnt have fumbled too.
It was a rare play, that is the point. Obviously, we would have been winning at halftime 14-10, which is what my post was. Forbes poster claims that 14-10 isnt winning, but it would have been.
But oh well, people see a vast difference in talent level. I didnt. I say a vast difference in QB play, that was all. Our defense looked as good as theirs, our cobbled together Oline really didnt play bad, they did not create a lot of pressure on CV, the receivers were open mostly, and the gsme was pretty equal I thought. If you cant see if Mumpfield got another half yard, and Bart doesnt get called for that penalty that it is a 24-17 game, and then say 24-17 equates to a huge talent disparity, then fine, that is your opinion. I just happen to disagree