ADVERTISEMENT

Cost to fire Narduzzi

What are you gonna do when he says no thanks to taking a reduced salary?

Spare me the Gundy and Norvell examples. Gundy's been at OSU forever and is an alumn. Norvell took a one year pay cut to $5.65m and had the rest go towards paying players. He's got a massive contract, but a low buyout.

I'm all for coaches kicking in to pay the players, but there's a reason they aren't coming out in droves to do it. They want others to fund it so they can keep their money.

Then you pay him his $30 million and sue Heather.
 
I know that it would be very costly to fire HCPN now. I think someone had posted specific numbers for what it would cost after 2025, 2026, etc.
I’m too lazy to research it. If someone has those estimates, I’d love to see them.
Pay him out a million a year for the next 30 years and be done with him just like Bonilla
Maybe he’d go for it
 
Then you pay him his $30 million and sue Heather.


Even by your standards, this is dumb.

They aren't suing anyone. And the hilarious thing is that the large majority of the people here were happy when she gave him that contract extension. After that ACC championship it was onward and upward for the Pitt Panthers with the great Pat Narduzzi as the head coach.

And some people tried to warn the majority, and were pretty much laughed at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrTongue
Even by your standards, this is dumb.

They aren't suing anyone. And the hilarious thing is that the large majority of the people here were happy when she gave him that contract extension. After that ACC championship it was onward and upward for the Pitt Panthers with the great Pat Narduzzi as the head coach.

And some people tried to warn the majority, and were pretty much laughed at.

I am mostly joking about suing her but I would have someone see crossed all her I's and dotted all her T's regarding the volleyball Taj Mahal. Either way, Joan is going to have to fund Narduzzi's buyout. We can't have him coaching in 2026 if 2025 is another failure.
 
Gundy probably did something and agreed to a reduced salary to pay players to avoid getting fired for cause.
 
I don’t get it, if you are not doing your job well and you really suck at it, why is there a buy out, most places, I you are not doing your job to the managements expectations you normally get fired, and you don’t get paid for getting fired, who came up with this buy out crap
 
I don’t get it, if you are not doing your job well and you really suck at it, why is there a buy out, most places, I you are not doing your job to the managements expectations you normally get fired, and you don’t get paid for getting fired, who came up with this buy out crap
WVU with DickRod were pioneers. But he still left.
 
Then you pay him his $30 million and sue Heather.
Sue Heather? You don't think all of the administrative sorts higher up the ladder also approved that deal? Of course they did. She doesn't get to write the big checks without her boss's agreeing with her at the time.
 
Pitt can't buyout Narduzzi.

Say he has a bad year next year - another 3-9 for example and gets canned after the 2025 season.

He has a guaranteed contract until 2030 (Thanks Heather) at ~$6 mil/year.

Pitt would eat $30 million? - then would have to hire a new coach?
Just say they go ultra cheap and go with Sanders at $3.5 with a 4 year guarantee

We'd be on the hook for around $44 large and that's just for the HC.
There's no way.

We'd better hope Narduzzi gets a bigger notepad.
I don't understand why people don't realize that you can negotiate those numbers - or you can negotiate at least the payout terms. Pitt has a legal department and I'm sure they have some insight on how to get around these numbers. If not call some boys on Wall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Islanderpanther
Basically were 7-1 with Eli and 0-5 without him. You guys who wish we could fire Narduzzi today (I'm not saying I like a 2030 extension myself!) might end up disappointed if we win 9 games next year.
 
So it seems to me that giving coaches these long term extensions will gradually become a thing of the past.

I mean....much of the thought process is to insure recruits your guy will be here throughout your career.

How is this even a consideration these days?

Im not sure....but I think the days of extending a coach for years / millions will gradually subside. In some small way its happening (Gundy, Norvell)

But we extended a mediocre coach, and we are now a shining example of what ineptitude looks like......
 
Basically were 7-1 with Eli and 0-5 without him. You guys who wish we could fire Narduzzi today (I'm not saying I like a 2030 extension myself!) might end up disappointed if we win 9 games next year.


Actually the people who think that Narduzzi is not a good coach and wish he was no longer here would be ecstatic if we win nine games.

They just understand that the chances of that happening are exceedingly low.
 
Actually the people who think that Narduzzi is not a good coach and wish he was no longer here would be ecstatic if we win nine games.

They just understand that the chances of that happening are exceedingly low.
I think that's true for most of us. Id be happy if he retired. There are a few real haters on this board I'm addressing who seem to actively root against any team Narduzzi and or Capel is coaching. You can tell who they are because they post more after losses than wins.
 
The buyout is negotiated just because it says 30m doesn't mean he gets it all. It depends on getting a new job which if Pat wanted to he should or Pitt says to his agent we'll give a bigger base to offset the buyout. If Pitt wanted to buy him out they could.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 303vND
I think that's true for most of us. Id be happy if he retired. There are a few real haters on this board I'm addressing who seem to actively root against any team Narduzzi and or Capel is coaching. You can tell who they are because they post more after losses than wins.
People should get off Capels ass already

He obviously inherited a shit house and has things heading in the right direction
 
The buyout is negotiated just because it says 30m doesn't mean he gets it all. It depends on getting a new job which if Pat wanted to he should or Pitt says to his agent we'll give a bigger base to offset the buyout. If Pitt wanted to buy him out they could.
There is some amount of money and circumstances where he walks away for well under 30 mil. Poke the bear; ask the questions.
 
The buyout is negotiated just because it says 30m doesn't mean he gets it all. It depends on getting a new job which if Pat wanted to he should or Pitt says to his agent we'll give a bigger base to offset the buyout. If Pitt wanted to buy him out they could.

Buyouts when firing a coach aren't negotiated. The number is the number. What is there to negotiate? If the contract says it's like 85% of remaining salary, then that's what it is. What can they negotiate?

Pitt: "Hey Pat, we are going to fire you but would like to negotiate your buyout."

Pat: "No thanks, I'll just take the amount written into the contract."
 
I know that it would be very costly to fire HCPN now. I think someone had posted specific numbers for what it would cost after 2025, 2026, etc.
I’m too lazy to research it. If someone has those estimates, I’d love to see them.
Why does Narduzzi need to be bought out?
 
Buyouts when firing a coach aren't negotiated. The number is the number. What is there to negotiate? If the contract says it's like 85% of remaining salary, then that's what it is. What can they negotiate?

Pitt: "Hey Pat, we are going to fire you but would like to negotiate your buyout."

Pat: "No thanks, I'll just take the amount written into the contract."
Hey, if he'd rather take 3 points and go to OT then 7 points and a win, maybe he'll take $12 million instead of $30 million. The good news is that he's clearly stupid enough to make a costly error in judgement. The bad news is that he's clearly got better judgement than anyone who's been associated with Pitt athletics for decades.
 
I don’t want to start a separate thread on this, so I’ll post this here:

Let’s say we finish below .500 next season and buyout the remainder of Coach Narduzzi’s contract. Anyone want to guess who we’d go after?
 
So it seems to me that giving coaches these long term extensions will gradually become a thing of the past.

I mean....much of the thought process is to insure recruits your guy will be here throughout your career.

How is this even a consideration these days?

Im not sure....but I think the days of extending a coach for years / millions will gradually subside. In some small way its happening (Gundy, Norvell)

But we extended a mediocre coach, and we are now a shining example of what ineptitude looks like......
I still can't believe Indiana signed Cignetti to an extension not even a full season on the job.

When Narduzzi got his extension, many were in favor of it. I thought he needed to prove that he could sustain the success because he still had time on his deal. Unless you have a proven championship coach or a coach who can get you 10 wins more often than not, it's worth taking a chance if another team will hire him away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FreeportPanther
Hey, if he'd rather take 3 points and go to OT then 7 points and a win, maybe he'll take $12 million instead of $30 million. The good news is that he's clearly stupid enough to make a costly error in judgement. The bad news is that he's clearly got better judgement than anyone who's been associated with Pitt athletics for decades.

You have a point as he is clearly stupid. Unfortunately, he has an agent and a lawyer.
 
I don’t want to start a separate thread on this, so I’ll post this here:

Let’s say we finish below .500 next season and buyout the remainder of Coach Narduzzi’s contract. Anyone want to guess who we’d go after?

Mike Shanahan if IU has another good season. Can get him super cheap to offset the Narduzzi buyout. He probably even takes the hometown discount to be a HC.
 
Mike Shanahan if IU has another good season. Can get him super cheap to offset the Narduzzi buyout. He probably even takes the hometown discount to be a HC.
Funny thing is, we have multiple former players (+ Tino Sunseri) rising in the coaching ranks that could theoretically take over the program some day… pretty cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guyasuta Genac
Duzz's mistakes did not make me laugh or make me mad but they were/are at the level of certainty for being so wrong that I think he needs to own up AND leave or present a plan that assures his AD that they will not repeat(not possible)

there's many who jump to criticize him early and often with both minor and major parts of the program including of course how he communicates(poorly/arrogant/embarrassingly?) during pressers, with claims of poor recruiting and numerous other bits and pieces but to me this bowl game's blunders have reached at year 10 a level of inexcusable that must be addressed

I am far more only a casual fan of Pitt FB and can walk away from it much easier than I'd walk away from Pitt BB and that is simply from an enjoyment standpoint rather than anything else and my point of that is to say for me Duzz has proven he doesn't have the coaching acumen to perform at the level needed and will never break through again like he did with KP once

for me, I need to either enjoy the game or know Pitt can do something at or near the peak of winning and BB with Capel now has returned to that so even though I don't need that with BB because I enjoy the games empirically I do not see that potential with Duzz, ever

I kind of look at him during the games pathetically writing notes, holding hands, patting his guys coming off the field like he's putting out every effort.....and then massively screwing up his part in trying to have his kids win a "meaningless" game...... that's not meaningless, that's sad, but it's not sad at the cost of 6+M per

weird rant? probably.....early Happy New Year to all anyway, even to the Duzz who we all will endure for at least 1 or 2 more years :) or more :(
 
People should get off Capels ass already

He obviously inherited a shit house and has things heading in the right direction

Yes back in 2016 some people on the board wanted Jamie Dixon fired (got Pitt into the NCAA almost every year) and replacing him was the answer to improving Pitt Basketball immediately.

Well it is now 2025 and Pitt basketball is now starting to get better.

Still waiting for Pitt to get into the NCAA's every year going forward to finally attain the success that Jamie had when he left.

Same logic of the same people who now want Narduzzi let go.

HAIL TO PITT!!!!
 
Yes back in 2016 some people on the board wanted Jamie Dixon fired (got Pitt into the NCAA almost every year) and replacing him was the answer to improving Pitt Basketball immediately.

Well it is now 2025 and Pitt basketball is now starting to get better.

Still waiting for Pitt to get into the NCAA's every year going forward to finally attain the success that Jamie had when he left.

Same logic of the same people who now want Narduzzi let go.

HAIL TO PITT!!!!
The two are no where near equal. Dixon was making tournaments every year. Winning Big East tournaments. Nard did win an ACC championship, but no playoffs, and has lost all but 2 bowl games. There is no way you can compare those 2 coaches accomplishment.
 
Yes back in 2016 some people on the board wanted Jamie Dixon fired (got Pitt into the NCAA almost every year) and replacing him was the answer to improving Pitt Basketball immediately.
Dixon felt more like Tomlin with the Steelers or Sullivan with the Penguins. Making the move wasn’t necessarily bad, but the hire afterwards was a disaster and not a guy that anyone wanted to replace Dixon.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT