Covid wasnt real?
- Thread starter Sean Miller Fan
- Start date
Mock the Spike protein and you will suffer COVID karma. Another lesson learned too late. Sigh...
observational cohort study based on retrospective chart review is just this side of useless
It’s not the only source. Theres numerous other studies as wel as the Vaers data base. Not to mention the fact that excess deaths for all of these rose dramatically after the jab was introduced. But I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. Lastly all of these side affects were observed in all the animals studies prior to emergency authorization You know the ones they skipped and never passed
So how many boosters did you take ?
data source is fine, type of study is weak to make conclusions
not coincidence, but needs further analysis with all factors in play, most importantly CV, vax, interventions
we talking about adverse or side effects? unsure from your posts and sources
boosted zero, might have but didn't as I was within a window of having confirmed CV
more proof you do not understand
every few posts you make me think you do but then you post this, I will stop wasting time
I don't think taking the CV vaccine is helpful at this point for most while other vaccines are
Pfizer Accused of Hiding Deaths in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials, Including 'Subject 11141050' in Kansas, Team Research Alleges | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
A recent report alleges that Pfizer concealed critical data regarding deaths in its COVID-19 vaccine trials, including the case of a Kansas participant. Discover the details surrounding these serious accusations and their implications for public health.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Yes the mountains of data showing a clear connection between sudden deaths, heart problems dramatic increases in cancer and other known side affects of the vaccine are all flawed. The jab is safe and effective.
I suppose highly respected experts like Dr Malone, Peter McCullough, Geert Vanden Bossche , former pfeizer VP Michael Yeadon and many others don’t understand either. The Vaers data base which was relied upon for decades to identify vaccine side affects is suddenly suspect even though prior studies showed it under reported vax injuries by a favor of 10.
There's a simple answer to this. Run a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial administered by independent partiesbefore vaccines are approved.
The interesting thing here, going back to COVID, when Trump was pushing to fast track a vaccine, alot of Dems are on record saying they wouldn't take it. And that it could not be done safely. Then Biden was elected and all of a sudden, "VACCINES FOR EVERYONE!!!".
The only thing that really protects the Left from being completely pilloried for this stuff is their media and Hollywood PR wings.
The only thing that really protects the Left from being completely pilloried for this stuff is their media and Hollywood PR wings.
oh, I think they were pilloried in November in big part because of it
and imo will cost them for a long time, unlike many other seminal events
Covid had little or nothing to do with this election and Trump getting in. The vast majority of people who support trumps policies disagree with the success of operation warp speed and the fact that Trump still pimps the jab to this day.
Trump was elected because people saw the stark contrast between where Trump had the country headed before the Scamdemic and where Biden had it headed after the Scamdemic. From the invasion at the border, to the endless wars, to the green new scam, to massive inflation. Those were the core issues. In short it’s the difference between policies that generally put America first to those that put America last. I will admit that the residue from forced jabs and rhetoric around that may have contributed as well albeit to a much lesser extent
I don’t need anyone saving me. Christ is King
I support policies that put American citizens first. There are no saviors. Most times it’s choosing the lesser of two evils. There’s many things I disagree with trump on Covid jab and his bowing down to his Zionist masters being two of them
most importantly you have no worries because of statement #1
short time here on earth
you for whatever reason/s believe you are importantly basing positions and decisions by whatever "America" is for you
in part is because I expect there's more complexity and depth or at least hope that while "America" alone can be pretty complex depending how you think
short time here on earth
you for whatever reason/s believe you are importantly basing positions and decisions by whatever "America" is for you
in part is because I expect there's more complexity and depth or at least hope that while "America" alone can be pretty complex depending how you think
They are stated quite clearly by Mullis the inventor No additional clarification. Needed
yeah, this is/was a problem and should've been standardized for use and not used for fanning flames or manipulation of the crisis
But that’s the problem if you listen to what he said at the end he stated it’s not designed to see if someone is sick or not
Safe Sure is good to be a pure blood.
www.zerohedge.com
"This Is Existential": Billionaire Cancer Researcher Says Covid & Vaccine Likely Causing Surge In Aggressive Cancers | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
so vaccine again over having covid is the more significant factor right? that's the way it reads, sort ofSafe Sure is good to be a pure blood.
"This Is Existential": Billionaire Cancer Researcher Says Covid & Vaccine Likely Causing Surge In Aggressive Cancers | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Ah my good friend. I knew you’d be the first to respond and you didn’t disappoint. Not sure I understand your comment. (Honestly )
of course
the title says both, the article reads like the vaccine is the bigger factor over simply having gotten the virus
so are you taking from this that the vaccination>having gotten covid is the bigger factor? or that the vaccination, since it didn't actually prevent you from getting covid was mostly worthless?
or what do you want others to glean? my point is you need to have studies to get anything meaningful from this and the guy's anecdotal is worthless and potentially misleading
That certainly a question to ask. Traditional infections "shouldn't" cause the immune system to malfunction. After all, evolution should have prepared us to handle it. Then again, this virus may be new, and even engineered.
The vaccine does something different and uses nanoparticles. Couldn't this skew your immune response? Also, the vaccine causes your cells to make S proteins, which some see as a big problem in that your system then attacks your cells that make the S proteins. But isn't that what all viruses do? They make our cells make virus cells? Why wouldn't our cells that make more SARS cause our immune system to attack those cells also?
I find it odd that it rarely seems to occur to people that injecting biological material and chemical agents directly into your bloodstream, thereby bypassing the body's standard pathways and immunological safeguards, i.e. through your skin, in your lungs, in your sinuses, through your digestive tract, you might be throwing a wrench into the works.
Anyhow, this just dropped on JRE #2294. This nephrologist wrote a book on vaccines. Here is her section on the history on the polio vaccine:
Trump the killer! Damn that operation warp speed! We must impeach!
You know they wanted to. But they couldn’t for that one.
For sure this guys insights are not proof in and of itselfof course
the title says both, the article reads like the vaccine is the bigger factor over simply having gotten the virus
so are you taking from this that the vaccination>having gotten covid is the bigger factor? or that the vaccination, since it didn't actually prevent you from getting covid was mostly worthless?
or what do you want others to glean? my point is you need to have studies to get anything meaningful from this and the guy's anecdotal is worthless and potentially misleading
However if you take interest in this he’s only one of literally hundreds of experts and numerous studies that indicate that there are serous side effects associated with the jab. And coincidentally there’s has been massive increases in the incidences of cancer and heart issues and other health problems since the jab was issued. Yes correlation doesn’t mean causation but it should be alarming And finally if you were tuned into the experts and studies BEFORE the jab was released this was all predicted by prior failures to advance the technology.
I’m not trying to convince anyone as to what to do. I’m personally glad my and my family chose not to get it. However I would think the info I’ve posted would give people a reason to look into this issue further. There have been studies on treatments to reverse the effects of the jab as well. and as a note clearly not everyone who got the jab is going to experience side affects. That’s the amazing thing about the human body. We are not all impacted the same way
I skimmed it and took it that the vaccine is causative. I don't think it's worthless whatsoever. I might be misleading however.of course
the title says both, the article reads like the vaccine is the bigger factor over simply having gotten the virus
so are you taking from this that the vaccination>having gotten covid is the bigger factor? or that the vaccination, since it didn't actually prevent you from getting covid was mostly worthless?
or what do you want others to glean? my point is you need to have studies to get anything meaningful from this and the guy's anecdotal is worthless and potentially misleading
Asking questions is a good thing. Only people who want to avoid answers have a problem with that. 🤫
as you know I think he made a huge mistake allowing the jab to be fast tracked and bypassing standard safety protocols. Having said that what should have been done is to better inform people of the risks and let them make their own decisions. Promoting it as safe and effective was the major problem as it mislead people into believing this was a normal vaccine and was 100 pct effective. We know for a fact that was far from the truth. Well that and mandating it (although that wasn’t trumps fault )
just those words mean it IS misleading
in the second bolded "I might be misleading however." you mean to type "It might ......." ?
of course it is necessary to ask questions, that's sets up hypothesis for study but the study to statistically get the causative part figured out is required otherwise many who don't understand will potentially ONLY be mislead
First bolded: remove the fear and emotion, it should not be alarming but it should necessitate legitimate studies to determine as best as possible at this point AND THAT SHOULD BE ALL
Second bolded: people will not and the massive majority don't have the time and importantly wherewithal to "look into this issue further" in any meaningful way
I can't waste more time with the "adverse events" v "side effects" issue - and there are some side effects
Exactly. The "experts" and their media parrots actually trumpeted those vaccine as if it were approved instead of being authorized based on the assumption that it might not kill you, but the virus will.
On the other hand. Those damaged by the vaccine maybe serve society by being the latest Darwin award winners.
Yeah, that's uncalled for. But sometimes I like to pretend I'm a Democrat. 🤭
Sorry. IT might be misleading.
I agree with you that all this screams for MORE science
And that any studies be run by a Pharma person paired with an anti vax person on the directing team. We have to trust it and not rely only on the peer review process which can only review so much.
Edit: I feel that we can't limit info just because there are people out there who refuse to learn or even to think.
Maybe that’s why the Us is one of the unheathiest country’s in the world despite spending more than any other country on healthcare
People have time to know and study all sorts of sports ball stats and issues. But spent little time understanding the consequences of what they put in their body. But hey it’s a free country and they can make their own choices and suffer the consequences
As to wherewithal that’s why good journalism would cover all sides of the debate and publish guys like this. That clearly is is not happening and the reason is most of the media is owned by Big Pharma. Which is another difference between the euros and the us. They don’t allow BP to advertise. Hopefully RFK jr changes that
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Was Kevin stallings great coach that just got a raw deal here?
- Latest: 316 S Bouquet
-
-
-
