Delusional posts on this thread. If Heather wants to be the person to hire the next men's basketball coach, she will be. Athletics have progressed significantly if unevenly.
Delusional posts on this thread. If Heather wants to be the person to hire the next men's basketball coach, she will be. Athletics have progressed significantly if unevenly.
The Stallings hire is the worst hire in the history of Pitt athletics, any sport. It’s not even close. I’m not defending Capel, but the Stallings hire was mocked immediately, he took a NCAA team in his first year and finished under .500, and basically quit on the team in his second year and we didn’t win a conference game. It’s not even in the same ballpark as Capel, who is probably the most “disappointing” hire, in that it seemed like such a great pick, didn’t work out. Sorta like Willard, which was a home run hire at the time.After this year no way. 4 years of bad seasons, late season collapses, poor recruiting and add to that the locker room turmoil and player transfers in the middle of the season and it adds up to Capel being the worst hire.
If we win 3 or 4 or 5 games total on the season, add that to the fact that so many kids have left the program including mid-season, the arrests, recruiting misses all over the place, lack of staff changes, etc... I disagree with you. Capel would now win this honor.The Stallings hire is the worst hire in the history of Pitt athletics, any sport. It’s not even close. I’m not defending Capel, but the Stallings hire was mocked immediately, he took a NCAA team in his first year and finished under .500, and basically quit on the team in his second year and we didn’t win a conference game. It’s not even in the same ballpark as Capel, who is probably the most “disappointing” hire, in that it seemed like such a great pick, didn’t work out. Sorta like Willard, which was a home run hire at the time.
But the answer will always be Stallings.
“hire” is not the same as “tenure”. Capel might be worse, on balance, because he will be here 4/5 years, and Stallings 2. But there is no possible way the Capel “hire” was worse than Stallings. Stallings was openly mocked at his introductory press conference. Everyone liked the Capel pick. It’s not close.If we win 3 or 4 or 5 games total on the season, add that to the fact that so many kids have left the program including mid-season, the arrests, recruiting misses all over the place, lack of staff changes, etc... I disagree with you. Capel would now win this honor.
I am only commenting as an outside observer. Two concrete facts are driving my judgement of the situation. 1. the undeniable discord among the top players in the last group-is an example of bad internal workings.Serious question - what do you think is so bad about the culture?
The Stallings hire is the worst hire in the history of Pitt athletics, any sport.
Not only that - paying Vandy for Stallings buyout when they were going to fire him!Reducing Dixon's buyout so you can hire Stallings is the worst decision in college sports history and that is not hyperbole. No one will ever find a worse coaching decision than that.
JC wasn’t a bad hire , as a matter of fact he was a great hire . No one wanted the job , Hurley used Pitt and the search was going nowhere
Not only that - paying Vandy for Stallings buyout when they were going to fire him!
I swore we paid some of that moneyVandy waived that to get rid of him, I am pretty sure. It was all part of the con.
Vandy needed to get rid of a coach but couldn't pay his buyout. Enter Barnes's old buddy Todd Turner who concocted the plan to pimp Stallings to Pitt so that Vandy could save the buyout money. I'd even guess bribes were paid to make this happen and I said for years this should have been investigated.
The Stallings hire is the worst hire in the history of Pitt athletics, any sport. It’s not even close. I’m not defending Capel, but the Stallings hire was mocked immediately, he took a NCAA team in his first year and finished under .500, and basically quit on the team in his second year and we didn’t win a conference game. It’s not even in the same ballpark as Capel, who is probably the most “disappointing” hire, in that it seemed like such a great pick, didn’t work out. Sorta like Willard, which was a home run hire at the time.
But the answer will always be Stallings.
The Stallings hire is the worst hire in the history of Pitt athletics, any sport. It’s not even close. I’m not defending Capel, but the Stallings hire was mocked immediately, he took a NCAA team in his first year and finished under .500, and basically quit on the team in his second year and we didn’t win a conference game. It’s not even in the same ballpark as Capel, who is probably the most “disappointing” hire, in that it seemed like such a great pick, didn’t work out. Sorta like Willard, which was a home run hire at the time.
But the answer will always be Stallings.
Here's the thing. Many of us did indeed believe that Capel was a good hire and could produce. Obviously, Lyke thought that as well. The problem is that she pulled the trigger on a big contract way too early. Now we have to live with the consequences. Fans always have hope.... the AD needs too have good sound business decision making. And btw, she's getting paid close to $1M to make these decisions. When you're making that kind of coin you don't get to hide from bad decisions (unless of course, you're the AD at Pitt).I think she…like a lot of us hoped…thought that he would be sought after in a few years, and the timing might align with Coach K retiring.
Obviously that’s a joke now - but think of the mindset in 2018.
Moral of the story might be avoid the big buyout for an unproven coach. If people come knocking, that’s a good problem to have and one that can be addressed with more money actually paid to a guy winning.
Even more so when TCU is an extremely donor rich school. My God, we should have taken those Baptists for a ride if they wanted Jamie so badly.Reducing Dixon's buyout so you can hire Stallings is the worst decision in college sports history and that is not hyperbole. No one will ever find a worse coaching decision than that.
Yes. Part of our current failures are still related to landing in the dumpster during the Stallings era. Capel hasn't gotten the job done but, at the same time, it's very hard to recover from what happened. We essentially gave ourselves the death penalty.
No it isnt. It takes a few players. He landed 3 legit players 5 minutes after getting the job and then Champagnie but got no one else and couldn't prevent those guys from screwing each other's girlfriends. Babysitting those 4 + landing one of his 29 Center prospects and its an NCAAT team in Year 2 or 3. Very easy
Here's the thing. Many of us did indeed believe that Capel was a good hire and could produce. Obviously, Lyke thought that as well. The problem is that she pulled the trigger on a big contract way too early. Now we have to live with the consequences. Fans always have hope.... the AD needs too have good sound business decision making. And btw, she's getting paid close to $1M to make these decisions. When you're making that kind of coin you don't get to hide from bad decisions (unless of course, you're the AD at Pitt).
Careful , now...we should have taken those Baptists for a ride if they wanted Jamie so badly.
My sentiments exactly, At the time, Capel was a good hire. The contract extension was the biggest screw up. A 15 mil buyout is ridiculous. They might as well fire him and have a $ 500,000 coach for the next 4 years. The games results would be the same.Here's the thing. Many of us did indeed believe that Capel was a good hire and could produce. Obviously, Lyke thought that as well. The problem is that she pulled the trigger on a big contract way too early. Now we have to live with the consequences. Fans always have hope.... the AD needs too have good sound business decision making. And btw, she's getting paid close to $1M to make these decisions. When you're making that kind of coin you don't get to hide from bad decisions (unless of course, you're the AD at Pitt).