Biertemple's headline in his article regarding last night's game. "Pitt avoids 0 - 3 start ". What a negative and bias headline. Always trying to put a negative spin on anything Pitt. He or whoever was responsible for the headline is a true jagoff.
If UPS got the pitt treatment, the headline for UPS's win over Rutgers would read something like "After losing out on chance at CFP, UPS rebounds by beating a hapless Rutgers team"
I think that Flame kid is a future star , he is a bright spot
Our attendance was worse, but..... it really shows how much they flat out don't care about basketball. This is going to be Pitt's worst season in a long time, almost no hope of a tourney berth. PSU on the other hand, this is one of the few seasons in school history that they enter the season with legit hopes.i was channel flipping last night, and I came across the Nit-Montana game that was being played at Bryce Jordan. I noticed that the "crowd" (a loosely used term) was rather sparse, so I looked up the attendance on the ESPN website:
Bryce Jordan seats 15,261....attendance last night was 5,854......38%.
For a school that brags about their 107,000 strong (!!!!), their basketball attendance is an embarrassment. Terrible.
Where's the media outcry?
But there's no way that you can compare Pitt's on-campus student population with theirs. I'd guess that they have triple the amount of students on campus than Pitt does. And as you say, this is one of their better teams, yet they still don't support it.Our attendance was worse, but..... it really shows how much they flat out don't care about basketball. This is going to be Pitt's worst season in a long time, almost no hope of a tourney berth. PSU on the other hand, this is one of the few seasons in school history that they enter the season with legit hopes.
Yes, I agree with everything you said, just pointing out that our attendance is awful. It's not impossible to fill the Pete, we did it for many years. At Pitt men's hoops is by far the biggest winter sport, if they build the program back up the fans will be back. At psu, wrestling completely dominates their winters with hockey gaining ground recently, they simply do not care about hoops.But there's no way that you can compare Pitt's on-campus student population with theirs. I'd guess that they have triple the amount of students on campus than Pitt does. And as you say, this is one of their better teams, yet they still don't support it.
i was channel flipping last night, and I came across the Nit-Montana game that was being played at Bryce Jordan. I noticed that the "crowd" (a loosely used term) was rather sparse, so I looked up the attendance on the ESPN website:
Bryce Jordan seats 15,261....attendance last night was 5,854......38%.
For a school that brags about their 107,000 strong (!!!!), their basketball attendance is an embarrassment. Terrible.
Where's the media outcry?
You could be right....the numbers that I quoted were directly from the ESPN website. If the Nits "fluffed" their attendance numbers, it wouldn't be the first time. They've even been known to "fluff" their football numbers, too......It wasn't close to that. Maybe 3000 similar to the Pitt game
Pitt needs to play hardball with those clowns.
Maybe so. Just saw Craig Meyer changed his Twitter pic to one of his head photoshopped on the Nittany Lion - I’m sure in response to the Pitt people on Twitter. And maybe on here too, hi Craig, You’re not that bad really. It’s mostly some of the other PG guysI think a lot of the Pitt fan whining about the unfair local media is overblown. But I do think it's entirely valid with Biertempfel and Ron Cook.
Maybe so. Just saw Craig Meyer changed his Twitter pic to one of his head photoshopped on the Nittany Lion - I’m sure in response to the Pitt people on Twitter. And maybe on here too, hi Craig, You’re not that bad really. It’s mostly some of the other PG guys
Maybe so. Just saw Craig Meyer changed his Twitter pic to one of his head photoshopped on the Nittany Lion - I’m sure in response to the Pitt people on Twitter. And maybe on here too, hi Craig, You’re not that bad really. It’s mostly some of the other PG guys
I agree.They always try to come up with somekind of negative spin.Biertemple's headline in his article regarding last night's game. "Pitt avoids 0 - 3 start ". What a negative and bias headline. Always trying to put a negative spin on anything Pitt. He or whoever was responsible for the headline is a true jagoff.
To me he's a much more offensive style Nasir Robinson with a good outside shot.Nasir was good for our team at the time but he didn't bring much other than rebounding and D.I think that Flame kid is a future star , he is a bright spot
I guess my question is, did anyone at the PG think to write an article about the episode South Park did trolling PSU about the Sandusky scandal? Hmmm, no? Well that seems weird...So I guess it's only newsworthy when Pitt gets dragged by a TV show.
I guess that is what happens when you have losers in the Pittsburgh media that have a cardboard cutout of a coach who enabled a pedophile.I guess my question is, did anyone at the PG think to write an article about the episode South Park did trolling PSU about the Sandusky scandal? Hmmm, no? Well that seems weird...So I guess it's only newsworthy when Pitt gets dragged by a TV show.
I don't know how things work at the trib, as it's essentially a blog. But the writers don't write the headline. That said, it reeks of something Biertiemple would do because he has a weird and sick thing about Pitt. He's unprofessional and should never report on anything that has to do with the school.Biertemple's headline in his article regarding last night's game. "Pitt avoids 0 - 3 start ". What a negative and bias headline. Always trying to put a negative spin on anything Pitt. He or whoever was responsible for the headline is a true jagoff.
Flame kid? Are you talking about Wilson-Frame? He is a very solid player who will be a major contributor this year and next year.