There doesn't seem to be a large Eastern Michigan online presence, but I found a thread that is generally complimentary of our new AD. The consensus seems to be that she inherited a bleak situation, made a lot of progress in a short time, and is leaving EMU in a better place:
http://csnbbs.com/thread-811188.html
Some posters' reactions to this hire have been borderline delusional. Pitt has major challenges -- among the worst giving of Power 5 schools, sub-optimal facilities (off-campus stadium, no track and field facility, no room for construction/expansion), a men's basketball program just starting a major rebuild, a women's basketball program struggling to get traction, history of instability in the AD/football coaching positions, lukewarm attendance/fan support, and near the bottom of the ACC in Sears Cup standings. What high profile AD is going to want these issues for the type of salary that Pitt would pay? It sounds like we got someone with a positive attitude who is not afraid to tackle tough jobs. If so, kudos to the committee that found her.
http://csnbbs.com/thread-811188.html
Some posters' reactions to this hire have been borderline delusional. Pitt has major challenges -- among the worst giving of Power 5 schools, sub-optimal facilities (off-campus stadium, no track and field facility, no room for construction/expansion), a men's basketball program just starting a major rebuild, a women's basketball program struggling to get traction, history of instability in the AD/football coaching positions, lukewarm attendance/fan support, and near the bottom of the ACC in Sears Cup standings. What high profile AD is going to want these issues for the type of salary that Pitt would pay? It sounds like we got someone with a positive attitude who is not afraid to tackle tough jobs. If so, kudos to the committee that found her.