Fleck and WMU getting a lesson in big boy football...

[NCanton Panther]

I'm sorry if disagreeing upsets you. I think I'm being very respectful and not demeaning of your opinion at all. I wouldn't get so dramatic about it. It's just a sports message board. HNY!

Not upset at all, rather I got the impression from your prior reply that you were upset with me when my posted opinion really wasn't even directed at you.

I'll chalk it up to the what happens all to often with text dialogue, mis-interpreting the tone or attitude in someone/anyone's text communications. Happens with emails as well.

 

[thebadby2]

FSU was clearly the better team, and both team's had injuries to deal with. If you want use that lame excuse, then Pitt beats NW if it weren't for injuries.

Exactly how was FSU the better team? They won by a point and needed a last minute fluke kick return to do it. And that's with Michigan not having the most impactful player in college football on the field.

And yeah, Peterman going down did more than likely cost us the NWU game. We were the better version team by any measure. Our offense can lget by without Conner, but not without Nate. Just as not having the best run stopper and 2 way player in America hurt Michigan.

 

[Piranha]

Exactly how was FSU the better team? They won by a point and needed a last minute fluke kick return to do it. And that's with Michigan not having the most impactful player in college football on the field.

And yeah, Peterman going down did more than likely cost us the NWU game. We were the better version team by any measure. Our offense can lget by without Conner, but not without Nate. Just as not having the best run stopper and 2 way player in America hurt Michigan.

Are you serious Clark? FSU led by 14 points after the 1st and 2nd Quarter. They led by 5 after 3rd Quarter and it should have been 11 if not for the gift Pick 6. FSU then lead by 12 again in the 4th Quarter before squandering the lead. FSU held the lead for almost 59 minutes of the game.

 

[UPitt '89]

Are you serious Clark? FSU led by 14 points after the 1st and 2nd Quarter. They led by 5 after 3rd Quarter and it should have been 11 if not for the gift Pick. FSU then lead by 12 again in the 4th Quarter before squandering the lead. FSU held the lead for almost 59 minutes in the game.

This is the same guy that thought Wisconsin winning by one score over WMU was proof that the MAC school was overwhelmed by the big, bad, Big Ten.

 

[Piranha]

This is the same guy that thought Wisconsin winning by one score over WMU was proof that the MAC school was overwhelmed by the big, bad, Big Ten.

True - another sucker that bought into the hype I suppose.

 

[thebadby2]

Are you serious Clark? FSU led by 14 points after the 1st and 2nd Quarter. They led by 5 after 3rd Quarter and it should have been 11 if not for the gift Pick 6. FSU then lead by 12 again in the 4th Quarter before squandering the lead. FSU held the lead for almost 59 minutes of the game.

Is that really your analysis to explain why you believe FSU was "clearly the better team" in that game?

 

[Piranha]

Is that really your analysis to explain why you believe FSU was "clearly the better team" in that game?

FSU had 371 yards of total offense to Michigan's 252 yards. FSU's defense dominated Michigan. FSU had more turnovers and still won. They led for almost the entire game.