Walls don't fix anything.I think Donald Trump's wall doesn't sound so bad. I also think we do need to tighten up our immigration. I'm sure Europe is rethinking the Syrian refugee thing now.....
Walls don't fix anything.I think Donald Trump's wall doesn't sound so bad. I also think we do need to tighten up our immigration. I'm sure Europe is rethinking the Syrian refugee thing now.....
PishposhNuke....who?....where?....keep in mind its been well documented Japan was ready to end it before the Nuke option....also don't forget Russias role in destroying the Nazis....
Not very well after
The Japanese response to Truman was a subtle answer shrouded in words which were difficult to translate one to one.
Additionally
the radicals in the military refused to surrender even AFTER the second bomb was dropped. They argued vigorously that the US had no more bombs. They argued that world opinion would soon turn against the US even if more bombs were available. But their attempts to alter the Government failed and it ended
Thank goodness Truman had the mindset to end that massive war right then and there.
Your nice little scenario of placing blame on the US might make good reading for some but omits critical information.
Harry dropped the Big One and he had damn well every reason AND right to do it.
Well what's stopping you? Planes leave for the Middle East every day. We've been doing a lot of killing over there for years, how did that work out? You aren't proposing genocide against all Muslims are you? Sounds like it. How about the Muslim girl who won the peace prize? You offing her as well?
We live in difficult times. It's tough to defend against killers when they themselves want to die.
Yes - like all of the German and Japanese terrorists we have now.
Really we needed to butt out many decades ago. The problems were lesser when brutal dictators were in power in the Middle East. All of our dictator toppling has done nothing but muck things up.
Ric your missing everything its religious not politicalPoliticians always ask this question when defending the war in Iraq. Is the world better off without Saddam? Everybody is supposed to say yes. But my question is ... is the USA better off without Saddam? My answer is no.
Ric your missing everything its religious not political
Well that's a far shot from you said in your original post. I don't disagree with a lot of what you wrote above, except I don't think you're grasping the root of this problem. Who do we go to war with and where? You see all these people refugeeing into Europe? They want to get away from this shit as well. They are Muslims, but want no part of Assad, or Isil or AlQueada! They just want pretty much what we want, live their life in peace.Freeport, we need to stop with the political correctness for one. Am I saying, go to war against Islam, no. Of course not. BUT......I liken it to this analogy. Say the Presbyterians have decided to be radicalized, and they start committing acts of aggression and terror, do you declare war on Christianity? No. You deal with the Presby's.
You just start going after radicalized jihadists, aggressively. You shut down internet sites. You go after money. You go after them indiscrimanently. If you are going to bomb and attack and surveilliance shows women and children are present, well so be it. You don't miss the opportunity. In WWII when we firebombed Berlin and Dresden, then Tokyo, their were civilians and innocents killed. It just is a shame, but it happens. They use people as shields.
I know the thought is that you go after one group and the void will be filled by another. While Germany and Japan was 70 years ago, and really no one in Europe or the Pacific have acted out with imperialistic aggression.
The one positive thing, is with the attacks on France and the Russian plane, it is no longer just an American problem. And one other thing I know, after 9/11 when we sort of had carte blanche to deal with radical Islam and our then administration decided to make it a personal contest against Saddam Hussein, by not focusing on our original mission and destroying these guys and their money sources, we caused Europe to be more in harm's way for retaliation. That is one reason they are so disappointed in the US.
We shall see. But let's see if the West can provide a united front against this threat for once. But make no mistake about it, some innocent Muslims will be penalized and likely harmed over it. That will be a shame, but we cannot be paralyzed by the fear of doing this.
Of course you would have done the same......the pipe smokers can debate the rest of it.Of course "The buck stops here" did the right thing for America and freedom. I would have done the same. But when solely considering morality, The precept "The end never justifies the means" is absolute. Within the realm of morality, you cannot intentionally kill one innocent person to save millions. But morality is an abstract and often conflicts with the real world. The necessity of survival should and always will Trump? abstract concepts. No individual is blameless for immoral acts.however necessary, justified and expedient. No matter how repugnant, survival often requires immoral behavior. Live with it. We are fast approaching this decision with regard to terrorism.
Well that's a far shot from you said in your original post. I don't disagree with a lot of what you wrote above, except I don't think you're grasping the root of this problem. Who do we go to war with and where? You see all these people refugeeing into Europe? They want to get away from this shit as well. They are Muslims, but want no part of Assad, or Isil or AlQueada! They just want pretty much what we want, live their life in peace.
We killed plenty of innocent people when we bombed Iraq, just like we did in other times. The difference in WW2, we were fighting nations with borders, industries, uniforms, armies, and so on. It was a different kind of war.
This is a conflict with a radical faction that claims to be Muslim. They have distorted their religion to appeal to disenfranchised youth whose life sucks so they can be convinced to take a shot at the hereafter for something better.
For the most part, the exist in the new cyber world, with no borders. You have to ferret them out, identify them, locate them and kill them.
And it just isn't us, as Europe is now finding out. Everyone has to pony up, including the moderate Arab states.
No easy answers here, just a lot of resolve, hard work and efficient use of highly specialized counter terrorism forces. Then work on changing the things that breed these assholes. Only way to win.
Could not agree more regarding illegals at least. If you're here illegally you should not receive a single right that citizens do. No fair trials, if something terrible happens to you... oh well.But we need to stop thinking of these terrorists who are here legally or illegally as "citizens".
I kind of think we are doing exactly what you're saying. This attack was in France, not the U.S. It has been a long time since we have had an attack by one of these groups succeed in this country. Is it luck? I doubt it.....Well remember the original post was when this all was going down and I was pissed (as we all should be). I am just saying, we have a lot of intelligence. Already one of the terrorists who blew himself up, the DNA or fingerprints have shown he was on watch lists. We know who a lot of these people are. Go after them. Don't wait. Don't need excuses. Go after them and kill them.
Even in this country, I was just up in Detroit. Lots of Arabs and Muslims, great food. A lot of good people. A lot of good Americans, who are Arab descent or from the Mid East now here. But those who still want to be beholden to Sharia law, who have ties to bad guys, well now those people we must monitor and if it comes to civil rights violations, so be it. What we cannot do is cry for their rights and bleed for them.
Obviously not 100% of the time, but I would think 90-95% of the time, we know who the bad people are. The problem is, we have to act within our own legal systems and they have to strike first before we can act. I am saying, eff that. Suspend that and act. Even if it is special ops within our own borders and take out some of these people, so be it.
But we need to stop thinking of these terrorists who are here legally or illegally as "citizens".
its called carpet bombingI think you know. I think we all know.
Dont' forget Sherman's march through the south, burning everything in sight. Civilians were fair game and suffered greatly. His famous quote "war is hell" still endures today.The "greatest generation" is to this day honored and greatly admired for winning WWII. It was total war and civilians were treated as combatants. A complete non military target, Dresden, was covered with incendiary bombs, incinerating 100,000 non combatants in one night. Tokyo was repeatedly carpeted with firebombs. 100,000 plus, overwhelmingly civilians, were burnt alive at Hiroshima and Nagasaki within a few minutes. Were these acts morally defensible? NO!
But they were necessary for the survival of free (relatively) nations.
Unless the civilized nations of the world come together with rock solid resolve to scotch this snake, the world will continue to devolve into anarchy. Though the United States irresponsibly ignited the flames of this widening conflagration, it is not our duty to go it alone. Nuclear weapons are out of the question and unnecessary.
War is ugly, brutal and inhuman. No one who is unwillingly to risk their own life should ask another to risk theirs.
Yea, remember in grade school when the bully kept kicking your butt, and you turned the other cheek, and he just stopped. Remember????
Show me isis on the map. Show me al quaeda. Show me where the domestic terrorist resides.
I really don't understand how this escapes people
EVERYONE gets that these are truly despicable POS.
But, they can't be "defeated" by force because they aren't an IT - a country, with a capital and an official leader/government.
It's wack a mole.
People are screaming to BOMB THEM INTO THE NEVER WORLD.
We blow up toyotas full of ISIS Arsehats every day. We fricken drone the bloody heck out of them, doctors without borders by accident.
We get the infamous Jihidi John POS and the next day they blow up Paris.
We need to get energy independent, get out of bed with the Saudis and quit acting the she dogs of the Israelis ... Keep up the intelligence and use special forces and our military to take out known threats, but otherwise get out of the ME entirely, let everyone know if anyone actually attacks Israel and they ask we will get their back, but outside of that quit having our dumb arse pols kiss their butts left and right.
I really don't understand how this escapes people
EVERYONE gets that these are truly despicable POS.
But, they can't be "defeated" by force because they aren't an IT - a country, with a capital and an official leader/government.
It's wack a mole.
People are screaming to BOMB THEM INTO THE NEVER WORLD.
We blow up toyotas full of ISIS Arsehats every day. We fricken drone the bloody heck out of them, doctors without borders by accident.
We get the infamous Jihidi John POS and the next day they blow up Paris.
We need to get energy independent, get out of bed with the Saudis and quit acting the she dogs of the Israelis ... Keep up the intelligence and use special forces and our military to take out known threats, but otherwise get out of the ME entirely, let everyone know if anyone actually attacks Israel and they ask we will get their back, but outside of that quit having our dumb arse pols kiss their butts left and right.
Just as a weird aside and honestly I seriously digress, but Oppenheimer (one of the creators of the atomic bomb) moved to St. John's in the Virgin Islands and the beach where built a home for he, his wife and daughter and lived in his later life is named after him. He chose to leave much of civilization behind. It is a beautiful beach and myself and Mr. Pitt-girl have spent many lovely afternoons there.Greetings to all my fellow Pitt alumni from a shocked and stunned France.
Actually, this is not the scenario that took place. In the days before Hiroshima, Truman called for "Unconditional Surrender" from Japan. The Japanese responded positively with once caveat: Their need to preserve the Emperor.. Truman refused this consideration. Following the atomic attacks, however, it was decided the Emperor could remain as a figure-head. Once this was relayed to the Japanese Government, those favoring peace were able to convince the Emperor to accept surrender and personally announce this directly to the Japanese populace.
Many believe the Japanese surrender would have come before the atomic attacks had we permitted the Emperor to remain. Such a surrender would have rendered the planned Allied invasion of the home islands (with the expected horrendous casualties) mute, thus removing the stated rational for the atomic attacks. It appears Truman was under great pressure from his advisors (particularly James Byrnes) to use the atomic bombs as a message to Stalin to keep hands off Japan and Asia so as to prevent the type of Soviet occupation as in E. Europe.
Just wait till they go after the Chinese.Maybe I've been watching too many world war2 movies but this is scary. Seems like this is one event that is helping to re align the original ally powers. Still not a fan of ground forces for us troops. Would be fearful of what would happen to troops that got captured
We are very seasoned travelers. Not afraid of much. Had a trip planned for 2 weeks in Europe soon. Sorry - it will be cancelled. Period. That is the price that is paid for this. Not sure who wins here - the terrorists? Either way, France has a big problem that needs to be fixed. Thank goodness this wasn't here. God bless us all.
But when solely considering morality, The precept "The end never justifies the means" is absolute. Within the realm of morality, you cannot intentionally kill one innocent person to save millions.
Perhaps in your wacked out version of morality, but not in most people's version. I think most people would happily agree with the notion that if the ends is great enough then you should be willing to use greater means to achieve it. To use the example that's been floating around lately, if you had the chance to kill baby Hitler but you know it would also mean killing baby Hitler's innocent baby cousin it is absolutely moral to kill the both of them. In fact I'd go so far as to say that if you knew what the consequences were going to be (and of course there is no way to know that at the time) that it would be immoral NOT to kill baby Hitler and his baby cousin to save millions of lives.
There was a wise philosopher who once posited "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or the one." I can't remember who that smart dude was, but he got it right.
Perhaps in your wacked out version of morality, but not in most people's version. I think most people would happily agree with the notion that if the ends is great enough then you should be willing to use greater means to achieve it. To use the example that's been floating around lately, if you had the chance to kill baby Hitler but you know it would also mean killing baby Hitler's innocent baby cousin it is absolutely moral to kill the both of them. In fact I'd go so far as to say that if you knew what the consequences were going to be (and of course there is no way to know that at the time) that it would be immoral NOT to kill baby Hitler and his baby cousin to save millions of lives.
There was a wise philosopher who once posited "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or the one." I can't remember who that smart dude was, but he got it right.
So you would not have carpet bombed Germany and let more Allied soldiers and Jews die? Why do you hate Jews?Not for nothing, but you have nust staked the position of the terrorists ...
We are better, how?
What the heck is going on? Without identification, you and I know WHO or at least WHAT type of group is responsible for this. This is scary, ridiculous and it is time, it is time to reign in this friggin religion. I don't care that all are not guilty, and all are not guilty. It is time to deal with this. They want to take the world back into the stone ages, well it is time to make them part of the stone ages and history.
No longer excusing, no longer justifying, no longer tip toeing around. I watch Obama today and he is clearly shaken up, but I didn't see the outrage that many (most of us) are feeling. It is time for Obama to put on the big boy pants as leader of the Free Western world and forget Political Correctness and lead.
So you would not have carpet bombed Germany and let more Allied soldiers and Jews die? Why do you hate Jews?
I'm small minded, but you choose to ignore all the other people killed by these groups the last decade. Not to mention those who died fleeing the area. Why do you hate Christians in that region too. They have been massacred and enslaved. We all know your disdain of Christianity, perhaps the Muslims are doing just what you want?Painfully small minded, but not surprising response.
And, past this point I will choose not to get into your gutter.
Paris was a horrible tragedy, an act of gutless POS scumbags.
120 or so people died.
The nazis slaughtered 6 million jews, and millions of other innocents ...
United coordinated world response, no more U.S. going it alone. Moderate Arab states need to ante up as well. Counter terrorism strategy using eavesdropping and planted agents to target and kill bad guys. Carpet bombing the Middle East is Looney talk. We'd be just as bad as they are. Do you notice how many of their fellow Arabs/Muslims they kill? Arab Nations have to share the wealth of the oil to fight the poverty and despair that breeds this shit. If massive force was the answer we'd have done that a long time ago.
Or just do what some here say and slaughter all brown people. Simple solutions for simple minds.
Doubt they have any interest in the Chinese. A large part of the reason we are held in such high esteem by these crackpots is our unwavering support of Israel.Just wait till they go after the Chinese.
Wow, don't know where you're going with this "logic", but a few facts may help....I'm small minded, but you choose to ignore all the other people killed by these groups the last decade. Not to mention those who died fleeing the area. Why do you hate Christians in that region too. They have been massacred and enslaved. We all know your disdain of Christianity, perhaps the Muslims are doing just what you want?
IMO, you put too much emphasis on the economic causes. Fundamentalist Islam has held the same view and approach toward all infidels as ISIS since the time of Mohammed--"Convert or die, spread Islam by military conquest." Hence, the Crusades and the Islamic invasions of Europe between roughly 700 A.D. and the 1500's (Battle of Lepanto). The primary motivating factor is religious. Economics is secondary but exacerbates the first.
Electronic intelligence is falling behind due to encryption being pushed in the current wave of advanced smart cell phones. That is hampering intelligence gathering about these savages. Just taking out their leadership isn't going to cut it. But keeping a large mainly U.S. occupying army on the ground in the mid-east won't either. But, far more than we are currently doing along with real leadership from moderate Arab countries and European countries is necessary. Allowing a fundamentalist caliphate nation to exist cannot be permitted.
Absolutely, these are historically tribal people. They grew up forever with allegiance to their tribe and religious sect. The concept of Nation and Country is foreign to these people. There were "kingdoms", but these were just extensions of the tribes. The idea that "Jeffersonian Democracy" was going to work/flourish in this region was a pipe dream. Most of these "countries" were arbitrarily created by the British after WW1 and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. It threw people together who had no desire to be together, oil and water!This is a really complex issue, but you touch on one fundamental point that people lose sight of.
We are doing MORE than enough, frankly.
We are on the other side of the planet, and spend trillions of dollars and lose the lives our our brave soldiers trying to deal with this mess, while the countries in the region at BEST sit around paralyzed, and most often in some way enable the extremist elements.
There simply is not enough we CAN do.
These people are different from us, and there is no amount of money, no amount of lives we can give, no amount of "will" or other trite phrases people throw out, that can make the entire middle east grow the F up.