Has the Republican Party evolved into fascism?

[Millerton]

Biden gave the USDA a million dollars to study bird flu with researchers from Wuhan before he left. This is happening in Georgia. There has been over 100 bird flu scares in Georgia this year.
1st stage of clearing out the area around LA after fies is done. Trump's EPA took 29 days to achieve this. It was estimated to take 18 months.
All the leaders of act blue are resigning because they are being investigating for massive money laundering. Mrs Thompson in Oregon donated 100 times to some politician in south Carolina and had no idea. This was done with thousands of people.

 

[Butler Pitt Fan]

Biden gave the USDA a million dollars to study bird flu with researchers from Wuhan before he left. This is happening in Georgia. There has been over 100 bird flu scares in Georgia this year.
1st stage of clearing out the area around LA after fies is done. Trump's EPA took 29 days to achieve this. It was estimated to take 18 months.
All the leaders of act blue are resigning because they are being investigating for massive money laundering. Mrs Thompson in Oregon donated 100 times to some politician in south Carolina and had no idea. This was done with thousands of people.

Can you provide an independent, recent source for these?

 

[NCPitt]

Can you provide an independent, recent source for these?

Los Angeles wildfire hazardous debris cleanup reaches substantial completion in record time | Governor of California

www.gov.ca.gov

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=148844

Democrats’ ActBlue donation platform looks a lot like a money-laundering scheme

US Rep. Dan Bishop, who is running to be NC attorney general, suggested if he were to win his race, investigating ActBlue's potential donor laundering would be among his first priorities.

www.carolinajournal.com

 

[KennyHeisman8]

He is right now higher apprpval at this point then any other time in his previous administration which is the 1st time any president has achieved this

Well that isn’t hard, because he started his first administration with the lowest approval ever. And I’m pretty sure at this point he has the second worst ever, only bettering himself.

 

[Butler Pitt Fan]

Los Angeles wildfire hazardous debris cleanup reaches substantial completion in record time | Governor of California

www.gov.ca.gov

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=148844

Democrats’ ActBlue donation platform looks a lot like a money-laundering scheme

US Rep. Dan Bishop, who is running to be NC attorney general, suggested if he were to win his race, investigating ActBlue's potential donor laundering would be among his first priorities.

www.carolinajournal.com

Thank you.

 

[Butler Pitt Fan]

Los Angeles wildfire hazardous debris cleanup reaches substantial completion in record time | Governor of California

www.gov.ca.gov

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=148844

Democrats’ ActBlue donation platform looks a lot like a money-laundering scheme

US Rep. Dan Bishop, who is running to be NC attorney general, suggested if he were to win his race, investigating ActBlue's potential donor laundering would be among his first priorities.

www.carolinajournal.com

I'll start with the ACT Blue one first. I read the piece in the Carolina Journal, which was an opinion piece (doesn't men he's incorrect) and from August 2, 2024 but nothing recent that proves that ActBlue was laundering money. If anything, this guy who the article was focused on was running for Attorney General in NC (he lost), sounds like it's "lawfare" you on the right are always railing against. I mean Charlie Kirk, who's quoted in the article, is highly partisan and clearly not an unbiased journalist, nor is Ken Paxton from Texas.

Here's what amounts to the "evidence" of this article of a conspiracy to launder money: "
Could there be a simple, innocent explanation for why people who gave small amounts a few times are listed as giving large amounts many times? Maybe. Maybe in these cases, ActBlue accidentally duplicated the same name over and over again in their reports instead of recording the legal and legitimate donor. Or, maybe ActBlue recorded the correct names and donation amounts, but the FEC got their wires crossed somehow and jumbled the data.

There could even be other non-nefarious explanations that are not as simple. But there is also the possibility that the Democratic Party has tapped into large funding sources that can’t be legally accepted.

"It almost seems too stupid to believe they’d try to pull something like that off. Maybe they assumed that if anybody ever asked these real Democrat donors....If they were stupid enough to pull off campaign-finance fraud of this magnitude, they will have undoubtedly left a papertrail, considering how poorly hidden this conspiracy was. I would not be surprised to see congressional hearings investigating the issue in addition to the attorneys general of a few states demanding these records."

Lot's of "could ifs, maybe, possibility" but no proof.

The partisan Republican House investigated it and released it's findings December 14th, 2024 (nothing that says Dem's were proven to be laundering money), which you can read here - https://republicans-cha.house.gov/2024/12/chairman-steil-releases-findings-from-subpoena-of-actblue

So what am I missing?

 

[Butler Pitt Fan]

Los Angeles wildfire hazardous debris cleanup reaches substantial completion in record time | Governor of California

www.gov.ca.gov

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=148844

Democrats’ ActBlue donation platform looks a lot like a money-laundering scheme

US Rep. Dan Bishop, who is running to be NC attorney general, suggested if he were to win his race, investigating ActBlue's potential donor laundering would be among his first priorities.

www.carolinajournal.com

The LA wildfires: I mean sure, ok, but when you read that from Newsome it's clear as day he's running for President. That seemed to me to be a fluff piece by a politically ambitious governor looking to tout his bi-partisan "credentials". But that doesn't mean it's not true either. But if you are going to credit Trump's EPA, should you also be crediting Newsome's state administration as well?

 

[NCPitt]

I'll start with the ACT Blue one first. I read the piece in the Carolina Journal, which was an opinion piece (doesn't men he's incorrect) and from August 2, 2024 but nothing recent that proves that ActBlue was laundering money. If anything, this guy who the article was focused on was running for Attorney General in NC (he lost), sounds like it's "lawfare" you on the right are always railing against. I mean Charlie Kirk, who's quoted in the article, is highly partisan and clearly not an unbiased journalist, nor is Ken Paxton from Texas.

Here's what amounts to the "evidence" of this article of a conspiracy to launder money: "
Could there be a simple, innocent explanation for why people who gave small amounts a few times are listed as giving large amounts many times? Maybe. Maybe in these cases, ActBlue accidentally duplicated the same name over and over again in their reports instead of recording the legal and legitimate donor. Or, maybe ActBlue recorded the correct names and donation amounts, but the FEC got their wires crossed somehow and jumbled the data.

There could even be other non-nefarious explanations that are not as simple. But there is also the possibility that the Democratic Party has tapped into large funding sources that can’t be legally accepted.

"It almost seems too stupid to believe they’d try to pull something like that off. Maybe they assumed that if anybody ever asked these real Democrat donors....If they were stupid enough to pull off campaign-finance fraud of this magnitude, they will have undoubtedly left a papertrail, considering how poorly hidden this conspiracy was. I would not be surprised to see congressional hearings investigating the issue in addition to the attorneys general of a few states demanding these records."

Lot's of "could ifs, maybe, possibility" but no proof.

The partisan Republican House investigated it and released it's findings December 14th, 2024 (nothing that says Dem's were proven to be laundering money), which you can read here - https://republicans-cha.house.gov/2024/12/chairman-steil-releases-findings-from-subpoena-of-actblue

So what am I missing?

I only included that article because it listed a specific example of a "donor" who didn't actually donate. There are plenty more of those examples.

 

[NCPitt]

The LA wildfires: I mean sure, ok, but when you read that from Newsome it's clear as day he's running for President. That seemed to me to be a fluff piece by a politically ambitious governor looking to tout his bi-partisan "credentials". But that doesn't mean it's not true either. But if you are going to credit Trump's EPA, should you also be crediting Newsome's state administration as well?

I didn't bring it up. I was just helping out by finding the articles. I could find plenty on the LA cleanup but I attached Newsome's because I assumed that he would be more credible with you. Maybe I was wrong.

 

[Butler Pitt Fan]

I didn't bring it up. I was just helping out by finding the articles. I could find plenty on the LA cleanup but I attached Newsome's because I assumed that he would be more credible with you. Maybe I was wrong.

I dislike Newsome ALMOST as much as I dislike trump. He’s another slime ball politician.

 

[Butler Pitt Fan]

I only included that article because it listed a specific example of a "donor" who didn't actually donate. There are plenty more of those examples.

I saw something recent from the New York Times but it’s behind a pay wall. I wasn’t being sarcastic I just thought I missed something. I’ll look for other examples.

 

[Fk_Pitt]

In thinking KH and JoeyCovid are the same dude

No way. Two different guys.

But I was just starting to think that Joey is really a conservative that’s posts the stuff he does to make democrats look like idiots.