ADVERTISEMENT

Has the Republican Party evolved into fascism?

Biden gave the USDA a million dollars to study bird flu with researchers from Wuhan before he left. This is happening in Georgia. There has been over 100 bird flu scares in Georgia this year.
1st stage of clearing out the area around LA after fies is done. Trump's EPA took 29 days to achieve this. It was estimated to take 18 months.
All the leaders of act blue are resigning because they are being investigating for massive money laundering. Mrs Thompson in Oregon donated 100 times to some politician in south Carolina and had no idea. This was done with thousands of people.
 
Biden gave the USDA a million dollars to study bird flu with researchers from Wuhan before he left. This is happening in Georgia. There has been over 100 bird flu scares in Georgia this year.
1st stage of clearing out the area around LA after fies is done. Trump's EPA took 29 days to achieve this. It was estimated to take 18 months.
All the leaders of act blue are resigning because they are being investigating for massive money laundering. Mrs Thompson in Oregon donated 100 times to some politician in south Carolina and had no idea. This was done with thousands of people.
Can you provide an independent, recent source for these?
 
Can you provide an independent, recent source for these?




 
He is right now higher apprpval at this point then any other time in his previous administration which is the 1st time any president has achieved this
Well that isn’t hard, because he started his first administration with the lowest approval ever. And I’m pretty sure at this point he has the second worst ever, only bettering himself.
 


Thank you.
 


I'll start with the ACT Blue one first. I read the piece in the Carolina Journal, which was an opinion piece (doesn't men he's incorrect) and from August 2, 2024 but nothing recent that proves that ActBlue was laundering money. If anything, this guy who the article was focused on was running for Attorney General in NC (he lost), sounds like it's "lawfare" you on the right are always railing against. I mean Charlie Kirk, who's quoted in the article, is highly partisan and clearly not an unbiased journalist, nor is Ken Paxton from Texas.

Here's what amounts to the "evidence" of this article of a conspiracy to launder money: "
Could there be a simple, innocent explanation for why people who gave small amounts a few times are listed as giving large amounts many times? Maybe. Maybe in these cases, ActBlue accidentally duplicated the same name over and over again in their reports instead of recording the legal and legitimate donor. Or, maybe ActBlue recorded the correct names and donation amounts, but the FEC got their wires crossed somehow and jumbled the data.

There could even be other non-nefarious explanations that are not as simple. But there is also the possibility that the Democratic Party has tapped into large funding sources that can’t be legally accepted.

"It almost seems too stupid to believe they’d try to pull something like that off. Maybe they assumed that if anybody ever asked these real Democrat donors....If they were stupid enough to pull off campaign-finance fraud of this magnitude, they will have undoubtedly left a papertrail, considering how poorly hidden this conspiracy was. I would not be surprised to see congressional hearings investigating the issue in addition to the attorneys general of a few states demanding these records."

Lot's of "could ifs, maybe, possibility" but no proof.

The partisan Republican House investigated it and released it's findings December 14th, 2024 (nothing that says Dem's were proven to be laundering money), which you can read here - https://republicans-cha.house.gov/2024/12/chairman-steil-releases-findings-from-subpoena-of-actblue

So what am I missing?
 
Last edited:


The LA wildfires: I mean sure, ok, but when you read that from Newsome it's clear as day he's running for President. That seemed to me to be a fluff piece by a politically ambitious governor looking to tout his bi-partisan "credentials". But that doesn't mean it's not true either. But if you are going to credit Trump's EPA, should you also be crediting Newsome's state administration as well?
 
I'll start with the ACT Blue one first. I read the piece in the Carolina Journal, which was an opinion piece (doesn't men he's incorrect) and from August 2, 2024 but nothing recent that proves that ActBlue was laundering money. If anything, this guy who the article was focused on was running for Attorney General in NC (he lost), sounds like it's "lawfare" you on the right are always railing against. I mean Charlie Kirk, who's quoted in the article, is highly partisan and clearly not an unbiased journalist, nor is Ken Paxton from Texas.

Here's what amounts to the "evidence" of this article of a conspiracy to launder money: "
Could there be a simple, innocent explanation for why people who gave small amounts a few times are listed as giving large amounts many times? Maybe. Maybe in these cases, ActBlue accidentally duplicated the same name over and over again in their reports instead of recording the legal and legitimate donor. Or, maybe ActBlue recorded the correct names and donation amounts, but the FEC got their wires crossed somehow and jumbled the data.

There could even be other non-nefarious explanations that are not as simple. But there is also the possibility that the Democratic Party has tapped into large funding sources that can’t be legally accepted.

"It almost seems too stupid to believe they’d try to pull something like that off. Maybe they assumed that if anybody ever asked these real Democrat donors....If they were stupid enough to pull off campaign-finance fraud of this magnitude, they will have undoubtedly left a papertrail, considering how poorly hidden this conspiracy was. I would not be surprised to see congressional hearings investigating the issue in addition to the attorneys general of a few states demanding these records."

Lot's of "could ifs, maybe, possibility" but no proof.

The partisan Republican House investigated it and released it's findings December 14th, 2024 (nothing that says Dem's were proven to be laundering money), which you can read here - https://republicans-cha.house.gov/2024/12/chairman-steil-releases-findings-from-subpoena-of-actblue

So what am I missing?
I only included that article because it listed a specific example of a "donor" who didn't actually donate. There are plenty more of those examples.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Butler Pitt Fan
The LA wildfires: I mean sure, ok, but when you read that from Newsome it's clear as day he's running for President. That seemed to me to be a fluff piece by a politically ambitious governor looking to tout his bi-partisan "credentials". But that doesn't mean it's not true either. But if you are going to credit Trump's EPA, should you also be crediting Newsome's state administration as well?
I didn't bring it up. I was just helping out by finding the articles. I could find plenty on the LA cleanup but I attached Newsome's because I assumed that he would be more credible with you. Maybe I was wrong.
 
I only included that article because it listed a specific example of a "donor" who didn't actually donate. There are plenty more of those examples.
I saw something recent from the New York Times but it’s behind a pay wall. I wasn’t being sarcastic I just thought I missed something. I’ll look for other examples.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BPKY
In thinking KH and JoeyCovid are the same dude
No way. Two different guys.

But I was just starting to think that Joey is really a conservative that’s posts the stuff he does to make democrats look like idiots.
 
Have you seen the NYT arrow map from the election? The Gop dominated it.



election-maps-1478682433327-videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600.png


"Each red arrow represents a U.S. county where Republicans gained ground in the 2024 election compared to the 2020 election, and the arrows’ lengths correlate to the magnitude of those gains. Overall, the map concisely illustrates an overwhelming nationwide shift to the right—literally and figuratively."
The MAGA coalition is growing. Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, and now Gen Z.

 
I dont know how many times I have to tell you that Trump has a historically high approval rating from rural, uneducated men. It's skewing the numbers. He is a God in Pennsyltucky, Fayette County, Greene County, and places like that.
And you’re a woman no doubt.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: BPKY
Masters-level white collar suburban white man. We vote Dem. We are educated. You vote with Cletus and Billy Bob. Be proud of that.

You are the party of the uneducated and easily brainwashed.

Not where most of the country lives. We're educated, PhD's, MD's, dentists, business CEO's, suburban, various ethnicities. We vote GOP proudly because it's the party of common sense, America and the Constitution. We have minds of our own and make our own decisions, unlike your side that follows Marxists like little lost sheep. I wouldn't be very proud of that because that means you hate America.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jtownknowitall
Not where most of the country lives. We're educated, PhD's, MD's, dentists, business CEO's, suburban, various ethnicities. We vote GOP proudly because it's the party of common sense, America and the Constitution. We have minds of our own and make our own decisions, unlike your side that follows Marxists like little lost sheep. I wouldn't be very proud of that because that means you hate America.

Charlie Kirk said there is a direct correlation between more the education you get, the more likely you are to vote Dem. He said it himself and he's right. But don't believe him. Look at the exit polling.

Trump won college educated white men by 1-2 points but this counts rural college educated white men, which means Kamala won white suburban men comfortably. Trump won white non-college educated by 40. The education divide is massive. You guys vote with Cletus. Lol.
 
Charlie Kirk said there is a direct correlation between more the education you get, the more likely you are to vote Dem. He said it himself and he's right. But don't believe him. Look at the exit polling.

Trump won college educated white men by 1-2 points but this counts rural college educated white men, which means Kamala won white suburban men comfortably. Trump won white non-college educated by 40. The education divide is massive. You guys vote with Cletus. Lol.
I like Cletus. He's good people.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BPKY
Not where most of the country lives. We're educated, PhD's, MD's, dentists, business CEO's, suburban, various ethnicities. We vote GOP proudly because it's the party of common sense, America and the Constitution. We have minds of our own and make our own decisions, unlike your side that follows Marxists like little lost sheep. I wouldn't be very proud of that because that means you hate America.
You vote GOP because it is the party of miserable old male racist white pieces of shit like you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pittmeister
Not where most of the country lives. We're educated, PhD's, MD's, dentists, business CEO's, suburban, various ethnicities. We vote GOP proudly because it's the party of common sense, America and the Constitution. We have minds of our own and make our own decisions, unlike your side that follows Marxists like little lost sheep. I wouldn't be very proud of that because that means you hate America.
Don’t pretend you love America or its constitution. You’re only in it for the money.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pittmeister
I like Cletus. He's good people.
He doesn’t know what the terms dense and scarce mean. He thinks a few Cletus’ impacts elections. What he doesn’t understand is that vast urban clitoris’ dominate his party.

Take our Cletus’ and his urban unmarried Karen’s or Lafwanda’s out of elections, and he will never see his beloved party win another General.
 
He doesn’t know what the terms dense and scarce mean. He thinks a few Cletus’ impacts elections. What he doesn’t understand is that vast urban clitoris’ dominate his party.

Take our Cletus’ and his urban unmarried Karen’s or Lafwanda’s out of elections, and he will never see his beloved party win another General.

Try again.

60 million people live in rural America. Mostly white.

41 million African-Americans in the US. Even if we assume they are all urban clitoris as you say, you still have more Cletus's and its why you win.

I am worrying about you. You are going down a dark dark path and not even hiding the racism anymore.
 
Try again.

60 million people live in rural America. Mostly white.

41 million African-Americans in the US. Even if we assume they are all urban clitoris as you say, you still have more Cletus's and its why you win.

I am worrying about you. You are going down a dark dark path and not even hiding the racism anymore.
Why not? Zelda made racism look cool.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pittmeister
Try again.

60 million people live in rural America. Mostly white.

41 million African-Americans in the US. Even if we assume they are all urban clitoris as you say, you still have more Cletus's and its why you win.

I am worrying about you. You are going down a dark dark path and not even hiding the racism anymore.
Racist? I’d have respect for you if you said misogynist considering unmarried liberal urban women come in all shapes and sizes. I’m on record here with feelings about them. I don’t hide it. And actually, I’m pretty sure that I’ve said here (search it), that unmarried white liberal women are the biggest threat to democracy.

Suburban married women with children are fine. Most don’t vote like you do.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jtownknowitall
Racist? I’d have respect for you if you said misogynist considering unmarried liberal urban women come in all shapes and sizes. I’m on record here with feelings about them. I don’t hide it. And actually, I’m pretty sure that I’ve said here (search it), that unmarried white liberal women are the biggest threat to democracy.

Suburban married women with children are fine. Most don’t vote like you do.
You mean like this psycho

 
I always say, these creatures aren’t the problem. It’s the white liberal women who will be the death of this country. You’ll see them in the background cheering this buffoon on.

Here’s one of many. lol. They’re the worst.

But there’s hope for them. When they get married and have kids and move to the burbs, they change. It’s like magic. Admittedly it’s a different kind of magic that turns a cluster of cells into a human when they move through the birth canal.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jtownknowitall
Those are the highly educated Dem voters that SMF keeps trying to talk about. They go around knocking off peoples' hats, keying Teslas, burning Tesla dealerships, shooting and killing CEO's, laying down in the middle of streets, burning American flags. Yeah, those highly educated, intelligent Dems.
Yes those degrees in gender studies prove you’re IQ is so much higher
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT