I didn't. Pitt obviously thought so because that was their move to take the program to the elusive next level and move on from Wanny's mediocrity.
Heather Lyke
- Thread starter King Of All Message Boards
- Start date
Well, he technically was an ass kicker. At least, that's what he was charged with.
It’s called reality. Just the facts. But I do hope Sparty makes her the offer. She actually would be a good fit and the job would play on her strengths. She’s over her head at Pitt and is a mismatch for what Pitt needs now.
Considering that the position has already been filled (for at least a few days) and she wasn’t even on the final list your wish isn’t likely to come true. Might wanna keep up so you can shift your hatred for her accordingly.
Did pitt extend her a raise since you know so much. I’m pretty sure we will know next year when pitt has to disclose. I bet she now makes $1.2 million. A nice 30 percent increase for just interviewing. My hatred won’t ever die for her. I judge by business performance. You enable and excuse. Big difference.
That I don’t know.
And you claiming what I do or don’t do is laughable. I’ve not commented at all other than posting what was written. So you’re either confusing me with someone else or making stuff up (much more likely).
But knowing that position was filled was no big deal especially considering it was posted in this thread. But keep ranting.
I agree that it's probably 5 to 8 this year.
Overall, I think that number will be close to 15 or 18 as things cycle. For example, I think FSU or Miami have the potential to fill the void when Clemson's ACC reign is over.
I think 6 to 8 SEC programs have the potential to win a Natty at some point.
Overall, I think that number will be close to 15 or 18 as things cycle. For example, I think FSU or Miami have the potential to fill the void when Clemson's ACC reign is over.
I think 6 to 8 SEC programs have the potential to win a Natty at some point.
In fairness to ghost, he's been busy jerking off on the erector set stadium at cow college.
As I said, at most NCAA D-I schools (especially the Power 5 schools), football funds the Athletic Department in a major way, Pitt is no different. Why does the school allow the #1 ISSUE to continue without trying to address it. My God, UPMC alone could fund the building of a new stadium if they were so inclined. I mean, it's not like they haven't thrown tens of millions of dollars (if not hundreds) into building facilities for other schools in the area. If Pitt doesn't address this issue,, it will continue to be the shell of the program that we ALL want it to become.
While I can agree with most of what you said, I do take issue with your comments about Pat Narduzzi. In my opinion, he is the perfect type of Head Coach for the Pitt program. People can relate to him and he has done a good job of keeping the program clean and free from NCAA investigations. He is NOT the problem. You could have any of the "big time" NCAA current Head Coaches (Saban, Day, etc...) here and the Pitt football team will continue to be the 6-6 and 7-5 team that we are all used to seeing. Top Recruits want to play at a school where they are appreciated by 80,000 fans weekly and become part of a team that has a chance to compete for a National Championship each year, that will not happen at Pitt while it plays in front of 30,000 people, in a stadium that everyone knows they just rent. I'm sorry if that sounds cold, but sadly, it is the truth. The University of Pittsburgh is the only sports team that I root for and it just frustrates me to know that they have no realistic chance to compete for a National Championship every year. Heather Lyke needs to do her job.
Would you morons quit talking about Wannstedt. THE GUY IS 69 years old. Jesus. I mean if you want to hire him as an associate AD and he can sit in a office and take donors to lunch and tell stories ABSOLUTELY. But I’m pretty sure the guy has 10 or 15 million lying around and has no interest.
Last edited:
This guy right here has a track record since (at least) 1997 of doing absolutely nothing but bitching… regardless of coach, AD, facilities or logos… oh and don’t forget colors.
having some “deep hatred of an AD” sounds absolutely pathological for crissakes. Please get a grip.
Agreed. Deep hatred of people, especially those you never met or who never intended to harm you, is kind of pathological.
I like a few personally, but as far as quality of the job they do or they are doing is avg at best, that's the reality, some much worse than others, in 35 years not much to cheer about....
The quality of the work is fine to not like. But a deep hatred, wowzers.
It is absolutely fair to criticize their work and want them out.
I don't hate anyone, been passionate about Pitt football for 40 plus years, sometimes that gets the best of people, myself included, but no hate.
