Where does it say Darnold was better but for political reasons they started Browne?
Have you seen Darnold play?? Unless Browne is the next Tom Brady, pretty sure Darnold is better.
Where does it say Darnold was better but for political reasons they started Browne?
For you.
Have you seen Darnold play?? Unless Browne is the next Tom Brady, pretty sure Darnold is better.
I agree but that is not what I was questioning. I question HOW things transpired. I find it hard to believe they played one guy over another for political reasons ( they were afraid Browne would transfer out).
That is the story that is out there. They went with the guy with more experience, but the USC coaches thought Darnold was the better player. They liked Browne as a player and didnt want him to transfer out...
I think initially USC thought they qould win with Browne so they went with him as the starter because he is older and more experienced....but when you start losing games all bets are off at that point.
Playing the guy with more experience is not the same as playing a guy so he will not transfer out (political according to the poster I am referring to in this thread). I get playing someone with more experience!
Colin Cowherd talks about it here at about the 2 minute mark... he supposedly talks with USC coaches? Who knows?
He says they didnt want Browne to transfer out because Darnold didnt have a good backup.
Yes, an announcer said that. Do you think the USC coaches told him that?
This is incorrect. They had a QB battle in camp, and Browne won. He won the starting job and held it for a few games. The HC decided to make a change after a couple of losses, and he did.
Perhaps Darnold is the better QB. Perhaps, if he'd stuck with Browne, USC would've won anyway. I have no idea.
I'm not saying Browne is better or even equal to Darnold, only that he was not "blown away in practice" by Darnold.
And if Browne is not the opening day starter for Pitt, it could just be that McVittee, who the staff loves, is the starter because he wins the job fair and square, and because the staff thinks he's going to be successful right away.
Yes. The USC Rivals site even reported a member of the coaching staff told them Darnold would be the starter after camp was over.So you honestly think that there was a competition in practice and even though one guy beat out the other guy, they played the guy that lost so he would not transfer out? Really
And...steel is gone.So you made my point. WSU lost to EWU yet dominated Stanford's D
No. People have said that all along. Like I've said check the entire USC site.Sounds like the coaches said Darnold outplayed Browne in camp but they started Browne instead. I just wonder if they are saying this now to prop up Darnold??? I see nothing dating back to camp verifying this claim. Not trying to be difficult as I think both are good QBs with Darnold being better at this point.
He only says that USC is to blame for not playing Darnold sooner. I am not questioning that! I am questioning the reason they did not play him. I think it makes more sense that they played Browne because he had more experience. older and been in their system longer. I don't buy that they played Darnold because they were afraid of Browne transferring out. We will never know for sure!
Browne lost his job because Darnold blew him away in practice and not because the first two games were tough.