Count me among the people who love hockey on this message board. I am not interested in trying to convert you and I respect your position. However, I think it is an infinitely interesting sport with so many variables inside the game and in the politics that surround the game.
It probably is over covered in Pittsburgh but it is probably undercovered nationally. ESPN in particular has done everything it could to marginalize the sport after it lost out on the NHL contract to the network that is currently called NBC Sports Network.
What is frustrating is listening to anchors who clearly don't understand the sport mangle everyone's names and do a wretched job of describing a sport of which they clearly don't even have a cursory understanding.
That can be difficult to sit through.
Also, not to pick on ESPN, but even the top plays are a joke. You will see a relatively pedestrian pass or dunk ranked number one. You will also see an absolutely amazing hockey play that doesn't even make the top 10.
Very weird stuff.
As for Pittsburgh, my frustration with the hockey discussion in this city is that it is often very underinformed and what we are seeing right now is a great illustration of it.
The hyper negativity surrounding the Penguins right now is ludicrously over-the-top.
When they win, everyone just kind of ignores it and pretend it didn't happen or that it happened but it doesn't matter that it happened.
When they lose, everyone wants to trade all of the players on the team and fire all of the coaches and management.
It is one thing when people act this crazy in a short season like football. Hockey seasons are long and this type of hyperbolic BS is tiresome.
Do people even realize that the Pittsburgh Penguins have won 8 of their past 11 games? Has anyone made that point during any of these talkshows? I asked that because I have listened intently and I sure haven't heard it. No one seems to care because Sidney Crosby is not scoring.
"Oh, my God! What are we going to do?! Sure, we beat the Canadiens, Capitals, Predators, and Wild as part of that streak but does it really matter? After all, Sidney's not scoring."
It is very, very strange and more than a little frustrating. It is negativity for negativity's sake.
Let's put the shoe on the other foot. Let's say that Sidney Crosby was lighting up the score sheet for the Penguins but for whatever reason the team had lost eight of their last 11 games. Would people be thrilled then? No, they would be just as pissed then too. They would say that all that point scoring does not matter because the team is losing.
And they would be right.