I admit I know nothing about him - but a former top 50 /Bama recruit that is still young is intriguing. Yarnell scheduled to play too.
Do not come. Do not come.
I feel for Nate. Dude has really stuck with the program when he could have transferred and nobody would have thought less of him.
Hoping the same. It feels a bit off that Nate was one of the three players Pitt took to ACC media days and he'd be heathly but not starting game one.Just hope it has nothing to do with any assurances given to transfers.
I agree. I'm fine with this. We are favored by 24 points. It's fine to go with who played best in practice and if it didn't work out, adjust before it's too late. Of all the positions on the field, QB is much less concerning to me than e.g. offensive line or linebackers. I think we're going to throw the ball around much better than last year.Agree - but he’ll still get a real shot still unless Holstein lights it up. And the latter would mean it was the right decision
Come on. What options could he really have had other than transfer to Division II or III? Holstein taking the reins is what’s best for the future of the program.I feel for Nate. Dude has really stuck with the program when he could have transferred and nobody would have thought less of him.
Because you know for certain that it happened before, right?Just hope it has nothing to do with any assurances given to transfers.
Desmond Reid named starter at HB
Hammond is another dude who has to be a bad practice player because he cant even sniff the field
What are the odds Pat could mangle the QB situation two years in a row.Just hope it has nothing to do with any assurances given to transfers.
What are the odds Pat could mangle the QB situation two years in a row.
Narduzzi's selections/management of quarterbacks (with a few notable exceptions (KP)) is Wannstedt-esque.Two? I think we might have won the Coastal if he'd have gotten Slovis out of the GT and Louisville games at halftime in 2022 after he was looking like Holderman and Bednar in those games.
I hope it did. Otherwise, we have the stupidest offensive brain trust ever created.Because you know for certain that it happened before, right?
Yarnell is a gamer. I think this is the wrong decision.
Hoping the same. It feels a bit off that Nate was one of the three players Pitt took to ACC media days and he'd be heathly but not starting game one.
Hammond is another dude who has to be a bad practice player because he cant even sniff the field
That one's just weird. He's a good player who had consistently made plays in games.
I can see the similarities, that’s a solid comparison. Pike was decent-ish, but always got the ball to in his playmakers hands…to make plays.Yarnell reminds me a bit of Tony Pike from Cincy, who was buried on the depth chart as 5th string. Had to be terrible in practice but was good in the games
I thought Nate did a fantastic job running the ball last year.Its probably because Yarnell can't move. Holstein is more mobile.
I wouldn't read too much into this anyways. Holstein still has to prove he can play.
I thought Nate did a fantastic job running the ball last year.
Last year, our best QB was Yarnell, and our best RB was Hammond and neither are starting Saturday. I stand by my prediction that Yarnell will play better than Holstein and I'll add that Hammond will be the most productive runner against Kent State.Narduzzi's limited response to Peak's Hammond question was kind of telling. It was very short with no elaboration or praise like he gave Reid and Davis. Don't know what's going on, but something isn't right.
How so?I hope it did. Otherwise, we have the stupidest offensive brain trust ever created.
Where would he have gone? The only direction available to him was downward.I feel for Nate. Dude has really stuck with the program when he could have transferred and nobody would have thought less of him.
Well if you believe what Dooz regularly claims he has nothing to do with the QB position at all.Narduzzi's selections/management of quarterbacks (with a few notable exceptions (KP)) is Wannstedt-esque.
Last year, our best QB was Yarnell, and our best RB was Hammond and neither are starting Saturday. I stand by my prediction that Yarnell will play better than Holstein and I'll add that Hammond will be the most productive runner against Kent State.