Hello. So, I read through the letter Huggins attorney’s sent to WVU, outlining his intention to remain HC at WVU. While I am not a lawyer, and have a true hatred for civil law, I will enjoy the spectacle of Huggins dragging WVU to court.
But, one of the biggest issues in the letter is when Huggins lawyer claimed that the case is close to being “fully resolved without charges.” On the surface, that may sound wrong and inconsistent with the law, but this is what I believe this lawyer is talking about. In Pennsylvania, there is a diversionary program called ARD. It is designed for non-violent 1st time offenders to give them a second chance. This program is mainly used in DUI, substance abuse, or drug charges. If the DA, Police and Judge agree to allow you to enter ARD, you are enrolled into what is a probationary program for a time determined by the judge. Once accepted, your charges are suspended, pending the successful completion of the program as determined by the judge. Assuming you complete the program in a satisfactory manner, including paying all charges associated with ARD, the charges are dropped, and you go on with your life. Conversely, if you screw it up and don’t follow the judges orders, you’re in for a tough time legally. I What’s interesting, the police charged Huggins as a 1st time offender, likely because it’s his first DUI in PA.
I would be beyond shocked if Robert Del Greco would be able to negotiate a dismissal of charges without the diversionary program being agreed to. Even if Del Greco would be able to convince the DA, the judge would have to approve. Also consider, the current DA Stephen Zappala lost his primary election, and is on real shaky ground. I don’t think he’s interested in letting a drunk walk after blowing a .210. There is definitely a high likelihood Huggins avoids serious charges at the end of this, as any of us would be afforded the same opportunity.
But, one of the biggest issues in the letter is when Huggins lawyer claimed that the case is close to being “fully resolved without charges.” On the surface, that may sound wrong and inconsistent with the law, but this is what I believe this lawyer is talking about. In Pennsylvania, there is a diversionary program called ARD. It is designed for non-violent 1st time offenders to give them a second chance. This program is mainly used in DUI, substance abuse, or drug charges. If the DA, Police and Judge agree to allow you to enter ARD, you are enrolled into what is a probationary program for a time determined by the judge. Once accepted, your charges are suspended, pending the successful completion of the program as determined by the judge. Assuming you complete the program in a satisfactory manner, including paying all charges associated with ARD, the charges are dropped, and you go on with your life. Conversely, if you screw it up and don’t follow the judges orders, you’re in for a tough time legally. I What’s interesting, the police charged Huggins as a 1st time offender, likely because it’s his first DUI in PA.
I would be beyond shocked if Robert Del Greco would be able to negotiate a dismissal of charges without the diversionary program being agreed to. Even if Del Greco would be able to convince the DA, the judge would have to approve. Also consider, the current DA Stephen Zappala lost his primary election, and is on real shaky ground. I don’t think he’s interested in letting a drunk walk after blowing a .210. There is definitely a high likelihood Huggins avoids serious charges at the end of this, as any of us would be afforded the same opportunity.