Huggins got them on a technicality and will reap more money from wvcc. They should've just fired his ass first time around instead of letting him resign. He's a POS
I was being facetious, of course you shouldn’t drive still. That’s a stupid law if not policed with some nuance, as you stated. Luckily my bar is 100 yards from my placeWell, if you drive, you may end up killing someone and making a bad situation about a zillion times worse.
Generally, I think it’s important for police to be nuanced in these situations. For example, if you sleep in the backseat or passenger seat with no keys in the ignition, I would never charge someone with DUI in those instances. It was clear that person didn’t intend to drive. You just have to be smart about drinking and have a plan before you get slammed.
I don’t think this is a meaningful technicality, to be honest. It’s very clear that he voluntarily resigned, despite that notification being sent from an email address with his wife’s name. It seems absurd on its face for him to now suggest that he didn’t resign.Huggins got them on a technicality and will reap more money from wvcc. They should've just fired his ass first time around instead of letting him resign. He's a POS
The choice for WVU is easy now. Agree he didn't resign and immediately fire him for cause. They gave him an easy way out but he wants to do it the hard way.I don’t think this is a meaningful technicality, to be honest. It’s very clear that he voluntarily resigned, despite that notification being sent from an email address with his wife’s name. It seems absurd on its face for him to now suggest that he didn’t resign.
I don’t think so, they can just keep doing their thing and operating under the reasonable belief and reliance that both parties have been operating under for the past three weeks, until Bob decided to suddenly reverse course with this weird charade: he resigned and retired, effective three weeks ago.The choice for WVU is easy now. Agree he didn't resign and immediately fire him for cause. They gave him an easy way out but he wants to do it the hard way.
I was thinking they may have paid him out something in return for his resignation. If so, they should fire his ass and take it back.I don’t think so, they can just keep doing their thing and operating under the reasonable belief and reliance that both parties have been operating under for the past three weeks, until Bob decided to suddenly reverse course with this weird charade: he resigned and retired, effective three weeks ago.
He literally had a different attorney call the university the day before this letter was sent to talk about getting paid out for his unused vacation time! It’s absurd.
Agreed. Whoppers are horrible and bad for your health, he could run into heart problems in the middle of March Madness.That is inexcusable reckless behavior.
The administration and donors don’t seem to share in that sediment. Otherwise, Baker would have fired him for cause and washed his hands of Huggins.
This is not a guy sitting in a bar and getting lit. Then trying to drive home a couple of miles. This is a 70 year old multimillionaire, who drove with a case of beer along I 70 for 150 miles to Washington Pa. Stopped got a couple of whoppers and continued what he thought was home. Still drinking, but he missed his mark and ended up on the Northside of Pittsburgh where 100K were congregating. He was 100 miles off his mark in Morgantown. He then realized something, and tried to find a way back, at this point at a 0.21, which even for an experienced drunk is trashed, and was going to drive 100 miles consuming more beers. The shredded tire and police stop saved his life and some others. But then to treat it lightly because "no one was hurt" is wrong.
That is inexcusable reckless behavior. Unexplainable.
No, you do not have to admit or plead guilt. You should discuss your options with an attorney, but usually the attorney will say to the District Justice that you recognize the charges against you, and you’ll be applying for the ARD program. And I agree with you, the reality is, he was caught and charged, that should give WVU cover if they decide to fire him, which it seems like that is what Huggins is looking for here.Won't he have to admit guilt to get ARD? IMO, WVU shouldn't base their decision on whether charges get erased and should be based on what he actually did.
No doubt, back in the day I drove with many seasoned drunk drivers to and from work sites, literally thousands of miles, no problems, eventually I would say the late eighties, or early 90's so many had gotten dui's just running around their small towns on the weekend, mostly stopped for minor violations . So we had to find a daily DD because the wives threatened to throw them out with one more fine.Probably because of all the practice he had doing it.
Maybe he was drunk when he wrote it and doesn't remember. I don't want to besmirch his spotless reputation, but...I don’t think this is a meaningful technicality, to be honest. It’s very clear that he voluntarily resigned, despite that notification being sent from an email address with his wife’s name. It seems absurd on its face for him to now suggest that he didn’t resign.
Getting arrested for driving drunk in a university leased vehicle supersedes any morals clause.