"Al Lord’s comments are personal and do not represent the opinions of the board or the university," Ira M. Lubert, the chairman of Penn State’s Board of Trustees, said in a statement to the publication. "The sentiments of the board and university leadership were expressed in the very first line of the statement released by Penn State: First and foremost, our thoughts remain with the victims of Jerry Sandusky."
OK, Lubert, so how about YOUR board take a censure action against YOUR member.
They clearly should have been given the death penalty. Disgusting!
The Trustee Al Lord had his own Business Problems being Head of Sallie Mae and Spanier asked him if he should file a Lawsuit against Louis Freeh and Al Lord was helping Spanier with the Legal Costs to do so.
This is the kind of remarks that can cause the Children Victims & their Lawyers to seek more Unsealing of the Confidential Settlements Documents that would bring far more Publicity Damage by way of Books, Documentaries, and Movies and Children Advocates can point out how the Penn State Children Protective Center is a hypocrisy of arrogance from such Trustees making such a statement. Three men came forward and told police that they were abused in the 1970s or 1980s by Sandusky. They are the first men to allege abuse before the 1990s."Al Lord’s comments are personal and do not represent the opinions of the board or the university," Ira M. Lubert, the chairman of Penn State’s Board of Trustees, said in a statement to the publication. "The sentiments of the board and university leadership were expressed in the very first line of the statement released by Penn State: First and foremost, our thoughts remain with the victims of Jerry Sandusky." OK, Lubert, so how about YOUR board take a censure action against YOUR member.
He was elected with about 9500 votes out of 650000 alumni that's about 1.5%. When you spend a lot of time on a message Board it may seem like it but he doesn't represent penn states views(atleast younger generations).
How is 1.5 % "overwhelming".The school quickly put out a statement condemning what this sick guy had to say. We're far from perfect but the overwhelming majority of penn state people don't support this guys views. The craziest people tend to be the loudest.He certainly does represent their views, as anyone with any experience with them clearly understands. That is why troglodytes like him and Lubrano were elected overwhelmingly by your alumni. Until your alumni displays enough courage or motivation to actually throw these horrifying examples of humanity off your board, your comments ring both naive and hollow.
We are sorry to paint with a broad brush, but HES ON YOUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND HE IS FUNDING SPANIERS DEFENSE. I don't care how many people didn't vote for him.He was elected with about 9500 votes out of 650000 alumni that's about 1.5%. When you spend a lot of time on a message Board it may seem like it but he doesn't represent penn states views(atleast younger generations).
How is 1.5 % "overwhelming".The school quickly put out a statement condemning what this sick guy had to say. We're far from perfect but the overwhelming majority of penn state people don't support this guys views. The craziest people tend to be the loudest.
There's a culture problem or a cult like mentality amongst a group of alumni who tend to be older and unfortunately have money and some influence. I'm not a paterno supporter. Was embarrassed by the paterno day didn't go to the game. the board here is an embarrassment so I try and stay away lions247 is much more sane to say the least. Most penn state people just want to move forward but a group of people like lubrano are holding us back. My only point is the average penn state person is nothing like the people you see on this message board.
There are like 6-7 crazy loons who defend PSU in these comment sections.
You have the Millersville St guy, the Clarion St guy, a few old teachers in Pennsyltucky, and some guy named JE Case. What gives
People might've went to the game because they paid for tickets and want to support the team doesn't mean they were happy about honoring paterno. I think most psu people thought it was incredibly tone deaf at best. Their was an article in the student newspaper denouncing the decision. The girl who wrote it was then called out (putting it mildly) by the cult group of older alumni.
Yes my point is the people on bwi aren't representative of the current student body and most of the alumni. Lunatics tend to be loud.That was the editorial over which BWI trashed the student who wrote the editorial for being a lesbian and claimed she hated Paterno because he was a strong conservative.
Yes my point is the people on bwi aren't representative of the current student body and most of the alumni. Lunatics tend to be loud.
There's a culture problem or a cult like mentality amongst a group of alumni who tend to be older and unfortunately have money and some influence. I'm not a paterno supporter. Was embarrassed by the paterno day didn't go to the game. the board here is an embarrassment so I try and stay away lions247 is much more sane to say the least. Most penn state people just want to move forward but a group of people like lubrano are holding us back. My only point is the average penn state person is nothing like the people you see on this message board.
It would be a mix of some agreement and some disagreement. Problem is there's no way to change the paterno people's mind.I never visit BWI, which would have all of the benefit of watching a snuff film. What I see all the time is the convictions of people in actual conversation... otherwise reasonable, educated people, people that are educators themselves and pillars of communities... until the topic of Paterno or Penn State's role comes up. By your measure lunatics tend to be everywhere in Central PA. It is absolutely far from a minority. I'm glad the current student base may think differently. It is the only hope that something may actually change there eventually.
I challenge you to walk through the tailgate fields outside of Beaver on Saturdays this fall and see how you are received if you promote the idea that Paterno's statue shouldn't be re-erected or his named dropped from the university's ice cream. Then come back and tell me how it is a minority.
Yes my point is the people on bwi aren't representative of the current student body and most of the alumni. Lunatics tend to be loud.
So are the members of the younger generation and the others going to demand his resignation? The on-campus Nits rioted to protest the firing of their enabling football coach; will they show such passion in an effort to get rid of that bum?He was elected with about 9500 votes out of 650000 alumni that's about 1.5%. When you spend a lot of time on a message Board it may seem like it but he doesn't represent penn states views(atleast younger generations).
It would be a mix of some agreement and some disagreement. Problem is there's no way to change the paterno people's mind.
He was elected with about 9500 votes out of 650000 alumni that's about 1.5%. When you spend a lot of time on a message Board it may seem like it but he doesn't represent penn states views(atleast younger generations).
One small correction, Al Lord did Not pay for Spanier's Criminal Defense that was cover under protests by PMA and will be dealt with later between them and Penn State and Penn State looks like they will be footing the Bill, and Al Lord if Re-elected as a Trustee will have a Conflict of Internets problem and should abstain.We are sorry to paint with a broad brush, but HES ON YOUR BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND HE IS FUNDING SPANIERS DEFENSE. I don't care how many people didn't vote for him.
There's a culture problem or a cult like mentality amongst a group of alumni who tend to be older and unfortunately have money and some influence. I'm not a paterno supporter. Was embarrassed by the paterno day didn't go to the game. the board here is an embarrassment so I try and stay away lions247 is much more sane to say the least. Most penn state people just want to move forward but a group of people like lubrano are holding us back. My only point is the average penn state person is nothing like the people you see on this message board.
He was elected with about 9500 votes out of 650000 alumni that's about 1.5%. When you spend a lot of time on a message Board it may seem like it but he doesn't represent penn states views(atleast younger generations).
I bet that when this guy run's for his seat again that his foul statement will have touched a base w/ many of St Penn Alum to increase his vote total. Too many St Penn Alum his statement was an overdue attack against the masses who constantly want St Penn to fail.How is 1.5 % "overwhelming".The school quickly put out a statement condemning what this sick guy had to say. We're far from perfect but the overwhelming majority of penn state people don't support this guys views. The craziest people tend to be the loudest.
I bet that when this guy run's for his seat again that his foul statement will have touched a base w/ many of St Penn Alum to increase his vote total. Too many St Penn Alum his statement was an overdue attack against the masses who constantly want St Penn to fail.
H2 PITT !!!
One of the reasons he probably submitted that piece was to get the votes of those types of alums.I bet that when this guy run's for his seat again that his foul statement will have touched a base w/ many of St Penn Alum to increase his vote total. Too many St Penn Alum his statement was an overdue attack against the masses who constantly want St Penn to fail.
H2 PITT !!!