They are on the circle jerk board, now asking for polygraph test. We all know, if those test came back different from what they hope for, they would find issues with the test. Give them credit, they made any of our Pedey sheep look 100 Sane!
Why McQuery? Albeit 10 years too late, but at least he finally admitted what happened - without him NONE of this would have come to light.Would love to see Bradley and schiano take a polygraph along with Mcquery.
Why McQuery? Albeit 10 years too late, but at least he finally admitted what happened - without him NONE of this would have come to light.
Regardless - MM should be lauded in your circles for exposing a serial pedophile.McQueary vs. Bradley/Schiano is currently "he said/she said." And nothing more.
Polygraph tests are kind of meaningless to me (and to the courts as well), but in a "he said/she said" situation wondering about the truthful-ness of each sides' claim isn't a crazy and radical opinion.
Regardless - MM should be lauded in your circles for exposing a serial pedophile.
McQueary vs. Bradley/Schiano is currently "he said/she said." And nothing more.
Polygraph tests are kind of meaningless to me (and to the courts as well), but in a "he said/she said" situation wondering about the truthful-ness of each sides' claim isn't a crazy and radical opinion.
Regardless - MM should be lauded in your circles for exposing a serial pedophile.
They are on the circle jerk board, now asking for polygraph test. We all know, if those test came back different from what they hope for, they would find issues with the test. Give them credit, they made any of our Pedey sheep look 100 Sane!
I'll take that as a concession that I had a point.
I can only speak for myself, I don't (and no individual fan can do this) speak for the entire fanbase: I don't have a problem with McQueary's actions in 2001.
If he is lying about Bradley and Schiano (the validity of his remarks about Tom and Greg are much more of an open question vs. the validity of what he told Paterno: we have Joe's own court testimony as regards their conversation)? Yes, then I do have a problem with McQueary.
The silence from Bradley and Schiano is an indicator they are not going to do anything at all, is my guess. They are smart and know the value of staying in the game but not bringing attention to one self against voices of victims?
Bradley just wanted to walk away and get as far away as possible from Penn State. Tom always wanted the Pitt Head Coaching Job, dating back to the 1990s. So did Sandusky unfortunately. Bradley now just wants to keep coaching again and WVU gave him that opportunity and so did UCLA.
The Piss Ants Cultists think he will sue for Defamation, but once again, the Truth is an Absolute Defense. Bradley knows to remain quiet makes no waves and can keep coaching by ignoring the Victim's Assertions.
As for Schiano, he made it known he always wanted the Penn State Job but it was never offered to him as a permanent position. Just like it was not offered to Tom Bradley, Jay Paterno, Larry Johnson, or even considered by any Paterno's prior staffers? This tells me something too, since Penn State avoided all of them that had been under Paterno & Sandusky?
Schinao credits Dave Wannstedt for teaching him College Football Coaching and was only at Penn state about 5-6 years.
Good Lawyers will tell Bradley & Schiano to avoid doing anything legally. Unlike the Civil Lawsuits Lawyers they will tell them it is best not sue because other unknown skeletons in the Penn State Shame of Fame Secret Closets are far from over. Besides, once one gets back into Coaching suing a Former University or even a Victim claiming they are lying is a sure way not to get Re-Hired during that Lawsuit.
Jay Paterno is finding out that the hard way and now is trying to run and find a way to get back into Coaching, but so far no takers.
Jay thinks by responding to Media people like Washington Post Sally Jenkins he is being a noble son and is defending his father and family as he attacks Sally Jenkins for defending the Public Voices of the Penn State Victims? Instead, he just made himself more isolated from consideration than ever before by anyone considering to hire him?
All that is doing opening up New Nightmares for the Victims and when it comes back on Jay's Father Legacy it just reeks an odor like any open sewer when that happen in 2011, and Jay just reopened it again and that smell is not just older but stronger now more than ever?
In a strange way, it is all coming back that had Joe Paterno dumped Sandusky in 1971 when the reputed first allegation of abuse happen saying his Program does not need that kind of distraction, so Gerry was let go.....it would avoided the entire scandal.
Nonetheless, this is what Jay Paterno did when he reopened the Penn State Smelly Sewer with that letter.....no one wants to bring in anyone that an odor he brought on himself by attacking a Victim.
It is like a friend asking to come into your car or home so he shower up with an odor that still following him, and keeps causing the problem by going back to a place he needs to let go, get clean, and not just change his clothes, but his attitude that keeps bringing him back and can't focus on anything else?
No University or Head Coach wants a distraction they want you focused on football!
This was my exact question every time I hear one of these cockamamie theories.
You don't need to start conducting polygraph tests. You just need to FINALLY use some common sense.
It is very simple. Who stands/stood to gain by lying and who doesn't? That will lead you right to the logical conclusion.
What possible motivation would Mike McQueery have to lie? I can think of a lot of things he stood to lose by blowing the whistle but not a whole lot that he stood to gain other than clearing his conscience.
We're talking about a kid who grew up in State College worshiping Paterno and the program. A dude who played quarterback for the Nittany Lions and was now coaching there, fulfilling a lifelong dream.
They don't come any more true blue Penn State than Mike McQueerie.
So you're telling me that this man who grew up worshiping Paterno and the program, and whose professional livelihood depended on its continued prosperity, was going to risk all of that by lying to sell down the river both his hero and his roommate/best friend - and some other random coach that he really did know at all - to bring down the program for reasons that remain unclear to anyone more than a decade later?
On the other hand, we have a bunch of people who have/had a direct financial/professional interest in disputing his claims.
And we think we need a polygraph test to get to the bottom of this unsolvable riddle? Are you f#%£ing kidding me?!
Penn State fans say they just want transparency and the truth. That's not at all what you guys want. You want Paterno to be exonerated at all costs, that's what you want. Whether that happens through legitimate or illegitimate means is really a secondary concern.
I'll take that as a concession that I had a point.
I can only speak for myself, I don't (and no individual fan can do this) speak for the entire fanbase: I don't have a problem with McQueary's actions in 2001.
If he is lying about Bradley and Schiano (the validity of his remarks about Tom and Greg are much more of an open question vs. the validity of what he told Paterno: we have Joe's own court testimony as regards their conversation)? Yes, then I do have a problem with McQueary.
They were working towards anointing him the Head Coach I was told by some Insiders, and one reason why Jay never left State College.Most people don't realize that Jay was the real heir to the throne. By the time Joe's last season rolled around, Jay had become, in essence, the HC. Was running meetings and channeling his father's wishes. I personally think that's why Joe held on as long as he did, thinking he could force Jay down the school's throat.
They were working towards anointing him the Head Coach I was told by some Insiders, and one reason why Jay never left State College.
Sue wanted him to remain there with her Grandchildren near her. Now Jay can't leave even if he wants to go elsewhere until he is offered a Coaching Position somewhere.
They were undercutting Bob O'Brien after he took over and the Players were glad to be rid of him, I was told. Some Articles confirmed it later too.
I think Jay should just take any position in the Commonwealth even Divisions II or III, and Get Bust Quit Whining and Get Busy Coaching again. In that way, Jay brings back his Father's Accomplishments of Autumn by showing he can coach and win like Joe without the Scandal.
Yep, Jay has handcuffed his own coaching career and so has Sue approving the Lawsuit and maybe a way to keep Jay around her. Paterno's has a number of family and relatives still working at Penn State too another Paterno Legacy too?Can't do that until his lawsuit is over. Can't claim you're tainted goods and un-hirable and then get a job working in a backwater. Just invites claims that's all he's worth, anyway. But I get your point.
We have two generations of people in the country who were raised in front of a television. They're used to seeing shows that have a shocker ending - the product of Hollywood writers who wrote such stories purely for entertainment value.You can make the argument that he has LESS to gain by lying and making this all up than everyone else, especially those still employed in the coaching field. They have a lot more to lose by telling the truth than McQueary. Schiano, Bradley, Johnson, Terry Smith (since we are naming names) all are currently employed coaches. They have more to protect than McQueary who has lost pretty much any football career opportunities. let alone I don't know where McQueary lives but if it is still in State College, his life is probably ruined there.
Same with those "truthers" who vehemently claim that 9/11 was an "inside job". Why? Why would the US want to do that? Or that the Neil Armstrong moon landing was done in an Hollywood studio. Again, why? What is the benefit of that? People really are morons.
Bradley & Schiano issued statements last week (on 7/12/16). Issuing a statement is not silence. Yet another thing you got wrong.
Winner, Winner Chicken Dinner.What did McQueary gain by testifying? What did he gain by bringing up Bradley and Schiano? Nothing and nothing. What do Bradley and Schiano have to gain by denying? Their continued six figure employment. You are free to draw your own conclusions. I have drawn mine.
Maybe Zika started there back in 1960s and then mutated in 2000s, could be a Defense for the Penn State Three to argue and the Cult should use it as an excuse for many of their Posts, one has to sympathy on how they behave and posts attacking everyone including their own Adopted Mother and Victims Veracity?Joebots have small brains
They were working towards anointing him the Head Coach I was told by some Insiders, and one reason why Jay never left State College.
Sue wanted him to remain there with her Grandchildren near her. Now Jay can't leave even if he wants to go elsewhere until he is offered a Coaching Position somewhere.
They were undercutting Bob O'Brien after he took over and the Players were glad to be rid of him, I was told. Some Articles confirmed it later too.
I think Jay should just take any position in the Commonwealth even Divisions II or III, and Get Bust Quit Whining and Get Busy Coaching again. In that way, Jay brings back his Father's Accomplishments of Autumn by showing he can coach and win like Joe without the Scandal.
Except MM was in a position of essentially 0 power and reported it to the most powerful at PSU and in Happy Valley. I'm not sure how much he would be expected to follow up after telling Joe Paterno. This is nothing like Paterno "telling" Spanier.Really, MM was part of the cover-up in actuality. He told Joe, who then covered it up. Then in exchange for his silence, bid red was given a paid coaching position--a promotion from graduate assistant. He never pushed this when nothing happened and it wasn't until Jerry did this at a local high school that it actually came out.
The only thing that MM did differently from anyone else is he didn't lie about it later after the fact when this was investigated. "Success with Your Honor" is really the Penn State mantra. It's all about the facade and not about the substance.
He doesn't have a coaching career. No one else was going to hire him and pay him any sort of money even before the Sandusky scandal. Why would he go D2 or D3 to work awful hours and make $80k a year?Yep, Jay has handcuffed his own coaching career and so has Sue approving the Lawsuit and maybe a way to keep Jay around her. Paterno's has a number of family and relatives still working at Penn State too another Paterno Legacy too?
I understand and accept Jay defending his Father and he is not wrong to do it, but he must be careful too on how to do it. Jay was not liked by the Players as a Coach either but he is still a good Husband, Son, and Father and I think he needs to go into Coaching and that will help the Paterno Name better than any Lawsuit, Books, Speeches, or Political Career? But up to Jay to chose his destiny now and I respect that too!
Franco is setting himself up as the Grand Wizzard of the truthers and birthers. Here is his speech from some award that Ped U gives out.
----------------------
“When you have a small group of people with money and connections and they know how to leverage power, they become detached and arrogant...they are above it all. So now we add arrogance and selfinterest to the unchecked power and we have a dangerous situation."
when reading the one paragraph by itself. It is not clear if he is talking about the BOT, or Paterno and the 3 Stooges.
" Polygraph tests are kind of meaningless " as much as I hate to admit it I think he is right. OJ failed his and it implicated him in murder, but as it turned out, he was innocent.McQueary vs. Bradley/Schiano is currently "he said/she said." And nothing more.
Polygraph tests are kind of meaningless to me (and to the courts as well), but in a "he said/she said" situation wondering about the truthful-ness of each sides' claim isn't a crazy and radical opinion.
Yep.....he was right about "unchecked power" but he is confused as to where it occurred!