Harley lone remaining original coach on d and back to needing OLine, 10th coach
I also think Hill is going to leave. Why? Because Bates has already mentioned that he may coach the safeties. I don't think he would be saying that if he thought Hill was going to stay at Pitt.Harley lone remaining original coach on d
Harley lone remaining original coach on d and back to needing OLine, 10th coach
This was easy to see once we hired Collins. Hill and Collins cover the same recruiting areas.
But this is why the Archie Collins hire wasn't as impressive. We weren't actually hiring him as the 10th coach. We were hiring him to replace our likely most valuable position coach. Then we still need a 10th coach.This was easy to see once we hired Collins. Hill and Collins cover the same recruiting areas.
Let me guess - you would only be satisfied if we stole the DB coach from a Top 20 Program.But this is why the Archie Collins hire wasn't as impressive. We weren't actually hiring him as the 10th coach. We were hiring him to replace our likely most valuable position coach. Then we still need a 10th coach.
Not at all, but he was one of our best recruiters and we need to get a better recruiting staff. Even if we say it is an even swap of Hill for Collins, that still means we need a big hire as the 10th coach and a GA or small school option will not be good enough for us to get better. You (with Stache and the usual suspects) tried the same argument when he was hired as the 10th coach and as the 10th coach it would have been a solid hire with potential. Of course, anyone with any insight, at all, could see it was likely he was going to be replacing Hill and we would be hiring someone else to actually be the 10th assistant. Now we HAVE to land a legitimate 10th assistant, who has proven to be a big time recruiter in order for this staff shuffle to look like an upgrade.Let me guess - you would only be satisfied if we stole the DB coach from a Top 20 Program.
Who did Hill land from Michigan? The DB’s were horrendous the previous year. A lot of people wanted to get rid of him.Not at all, but he was one of our best recruiters and we need to get a better recruiting staff. Even if we say it is an even swap of Hill for Collins, that still means we need a big hire as the 10th coach and a GA or small school option will not be good enough for us to get better. You and others tried the same arguments when he was hired as the 10th coach and as the 10th coach it would have been a solid hire with potential. Of course, anyone with any insight, at all, could see it was likely he was going to be replacing Hill and we would be hiring someone else to actually be the 10th assistant. Now we HAVE to land a legitimate 10th assistant, who has proven to be a big time recruiter in order for this staff shuffle to look like an upgrade.
He landed Hamlin and Hill, who are two of the best recruits we have signed under HCPN. Practically any time spent recruiting in the state of Michigan is an absolute waste. It doesn't matter who the coach is. Is your argument that Collins will be a better recruiter and that will mainly be proven by him landing top P5 targets out of the state of Michigan?Who did Hill land from Michigan? The DB’s were horrendous the previous year. A lot of people wanted to get rid of him.
He wasn’t the primary recruiter for those guys. Narduzzi is the main reason why Hamlin chose Pitt.He landed Hamlin and Hill, who are two of the best recruits we have signed under HCPN. Practically any time spent recruiting in the state of Michigan is an absolute waste. It doesn't matter who the coach is. Is your argument that Collins will be a better recruiter and that will mainly be proven by him landing top P5 targets out of the state of Michigan?
The DBs have been bad under HCPN and Hill, I agree. I think much of that has been talent and scheme. Last year many thought our DB play got much better. I think it got better, but more importantly our scheme was more flexible after we got absolutely torched by OSU, once again. I have no idea who got HCPN to give in and adapt. Maybe it was Hill. Maybe it wasn't. Hopefully it continues this year with Bates, Collins, etc. or we are going to get blown out by some opponents.
I doubt they want to take QB focus away from Watson, but I would be ok with that. I'd say you just have to get the best recruiter you can and put him wherever.Maybe a QB coach for the 10th spot? That would be my preference.
He was.He wasn’t the primary recruiter for those guys. Narduzzi is the main reason why Hamlin chose Pitt.
Now we know why he turned down the Michigan State job to "stay" at Pitt.Nice of him to wait until after signing day.
He landed Hamlin and Hill, who are two of the best recruits we have signed under HCPN. Practically any time spent recruiting in the state of Michigan is an absolute waste. It doesn't matter who the coach is. Is your argument that Collins will be a better recruiter and that will mainly be proven by him landing top P5 targets out of the state of Michigan?
The DBs have been bad under HCPN and Hill, I agree. I think much of that has been talent and scheme. Last year many thought our DB play got much better. I think it got better, but more importantly our scheme was more flexible after we got absolutely torched by OSU, once again. I have no idea who got HCPN to give in and adapt. Maybe it was Hill. Maybe it wasn't. Hopefully it continues this year with Bates, Collins, etc. or we are going to get blown out by some opponents.
Some find a problem with everything some have no problem with anything, then they dig in a argue for pages.....
Maybe both are right to a degree.