ADVERTISEMENT

If Pitt can get Wade

GT74

All Conference
Gold Member
Jul 20, 2001
5,707
2,600
113
New Castle
The talent level for next year is immediately upgraded. After watching his and Paris Ford highlights, they truly are special talents, and combined with the guys Pitt has returning, would certainly improve the secondary bigtime. Pitt's future is bright, and with a few more blue-chip recruits, could be on another level defensively soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Agreed.

While we will miss the 2 big boys on the line (#5 & #6), I think our D will be more athletic overall. They will get their growing pains against PSU and OSU, but should be ready when Conference play starts. And that should be the prize again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
It is pretty clear to me, though, that Paris has to play on offense. HCPN should be able to figure out his defense with his other recruits and returning players. We need playmakers on offense, especially with a young QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
It is pretty clear to me, though, that Paris has to play on offense. HCPN should be able to figure out his defense with his other recruits and returning players. We need playmakers on offense, especially with a young QB.

Then recruit playmakers on offense and stop taking commitments from players who aren't playmakers.
 
as I stated in earlier posts Pitt is going to get Wade and is going all out to do so.
They have a started good pipeline from Clairton just like the Wannestedt and Harris s did with Woodland Hills. Why do you think they are offering Noah Hamlin ? Remember when Lafayette Pitts was recruited ?
For more insight read these two articles : http://pittsburghsportsnow.com/2016/11/15/hamlin-close-offer-pitt/ & http://pittsburghsportsnow.com/2016/11/16/mathews-making-impact-pitt/.
And PantherDave NOT ALL players are on offense. or are you telling me that AAron Donald wasn't a playmaker ? And whitehead is considered one of the top players on the team, if not the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
I think we have a shot at him but depending on how OSU finishes, I can see him going there and not PSU or Pitt.
 
I don't see Wade coming to Pitt. Not sure what info you guys have. I'm hearing he's not high on Pitt.
 
I think we have a shot at him but depending on how OSU finishes, I can see him going there and not PSU or Pitt.
Why would how OSU finishes matter to him? In the absolute worst case they end the year 9-4, but much more likely their floor is 10-3 and a losing trip to the Orange Bowl. That would be our best season in 30 years. Either way, OSU is one of the best programs in the country and contends for conference and national titles every year. However, it is unlikely they would take him.
 
I don't see as great of a need for him on offense as I see for him on defense.
I do. If we are getting Wade and already have Hamlin, Coleman, Garner, and Miller from last year, Narduzzi should be able to put a secondary together. On offense I don't see any playmakers that can really make the defense pay at every level. Henderson is explosive, but he almost has to get the ball behind the line of scrimmage, with the field ahead of him and defenders on their heels, to be really dangerous.
 
I do. If we are getting Wade and already have Hamlin, Coleman, Garner, and Miller from last year, Narduzzi should be able to put a secondary together. On offense I don't see any playmakers that can really make the defense pay at every level. Henderson is explosive, but he almost has to get the ball behind the line of scrimmage, with the field ahead of him and defenders on their heels, to be really dangerous.

If we're moving DBs to offense I'd go with Paris Ford or Jordan Whitehead before Wade.
 
OMG, this line of thinking - that a kid will make his college choice based on whether a school wins x, or x +1 games this year -- is really laughable. This is where a kid is actually going to live, and study, and play ball for the next 3-5 years. This factor is irrelevant to kids. To the extent that they care about wins, they will naturally be more concerned about how many wins they think a team will have over the next several years when THEY might be there.

Regarding Ford, if you think Pitt needs offensive playmakers, you won't find a better option than Ford. I'd love for him to play on offense instead of D, and if he does play on offense, it won't be because he has to play there because of a desperate situation, it will be because the coaches will want to maximize his abilities and his contribution to the team. BTW, in case you hadn't noticed, Pitt's offense is tearing it up, week after week, so the idea that we are desperate for playmakers on offense is silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jpripper88
This turned into the dumbest thread ever. You have the Pitt fans saying Pitt and the penn state fans with pitt handles saying they hear Pitt isnt even in it. What a total joke.

From what Wade has said himself he is high on Pitt. Does he pick pitt??? WHo the hell knows. He should, he has the best db coach in the country here who also happens to like to play players both ways. He would be home to be a hero in front of all his friends and family, and Pitt has a habit of making NFL HOFers.

But... all that means squat. He could choose whoever. He has not tipped his hat either way.
 
OMG, this line of thinking - that a kid will make his college choice based on whether a school wins x, or x +1 games this year -- is really laughable. This is where a kid is actually going to live, and study, and play ball for the next 3-5 years. This factor is irrelevant to kids. To the extent that they care about wins, they will naturally be more concerned about how many wins they think a team will have over the next several years when THEY might be there.

Regarding Ford, if you think Pitt needs offensive playmakers, you won't find a better option than Ford. I'd love for him to play on offense instead of D, and if he does play on offense, it won't be because he has to play there because of a desperate situation, it will be because the coaches will want to maximize his abilities and his contribution to the team. BTW, in case you hadn't noticed, Pitt's offense is tearing it up, week after week, so the idea that we are desperate for playmakers on offense is silly.
-We have former 4/5 star Chris Clark eligible, 4 star Charles Reeves, get 4 Star Sibley, and get Paris Ford, the most electric player in high school football. That an every single wr returns, every rb likely returns, and the offensive line is still loaded. Oh, and we still have that guy named Matt Canada. The offense should be even better next year.
 
From what Wade has said himself he is high on Pitt. Does he pick pitt??? WHo the hell knows. He should, he has the best db coach in the country.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: burnie1105
This turned into the dumbest thread ever. You have the Pitt fans saying Pitt and the penn state fans with pitt handles saying they hear Pitt isnt even in it. What a total joke.

From what Wade has said himself he is high on Pitt. Does he pick pitt??? WHo the hell knows. He should, he has the best db coach in the country here who also happens to like to play players both ways. He would be home to be a hero in front of all his friends and family, and Pitt has a habit of making NFL HOFers.

But... all that means squat. He could choose whoever. He has not tipped his hat either way.


Hill is on his way out......
 
I don't think he's coming. I think he picks UCLA for the LA area and the business school he was talking about in his video today.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT