ADVERTISEMENT

If SMF was ACC commish

Sean Miller Fan

Lair Hall of Famer
Oct 30, 2001
68,251
22,038
113
It'd be a wrap. Here's my way outside the box plan (which is what will be needed when the Big Ten and SEC attempt to form super-conferences)

- add Texas and ND
- switch to a 7 game conference schedule with 4 4-team divisions
- play everyone in your division and then 1 game vs 2 other divisions, 2 games vs the last division

ACC North
ND
Texas
Syr
BC

- ND and Texas get to play every year, gets them 2 games they will win 8-9 out of 10 years in major Northeast media markets (if we count NYC for Syracuse)

ACC South
FSU
Miami
GT
Lou

ACC Tobacco Road
UNC
NCSt
Duke
Wake

ACC Central
Pitt
UVa
VT
Clemson

- the 2 top division champs meet for ACCCG, which ensures a big-time matchup every year. The other 2 division winners get some upper bowl assurance

- ND and Texas (and everyone) will have 5 OOC games to schedule

ND
- Navy
- USC
- cupcake
- Shamrock Series
- rotate between Stanford, Purdue, and others

Texas
- OU
- A&M (will happen eventually)
- TT, Baylor, TCU, or big time opponent
- cupcake
- cupcake

- the 14 other ACC teams have a Week 2 game every year vs another ACC team which will NOT be a conference game

- here's what gets this deal done: ND and Texas get the TV rights to all home football games but have to share a portion of their revenue with the the other 14 (25%)

Sample Pitt schedule
Week 1 FCS
Week 2 ACC Non-con (either Syr, BC, 4 Carolinas, FSU, Miami, GT, Lou)
Week 3 WVU
Week 4 FBS cupcake
Week 5 FBS cupcake (or P5 opponent)

7 ACC games

The ACC is going to have to be very creative if Texas is shopping around. It cannot afford to have the SEC and B10 form super conferences
 
It'd be a wrap. Here's my way outside the box plan (which is what will be needed when the Big Ten and SEC attempt to form super-conferences)

- add Texas and ND
- switch to a 7 game conference schedule with 4 4-team divisions
- play everyone in your division and then 1 game vs 2 other divisions, 2 games vs the last division

ACC North
ND
Texas
Syr
BC

- ND and Texas get to play every year, gets them 2 games they will win 8-9 out of 10 years in major Northeast media markets (if we count NYC for Syracuse)

ACC South
FSU
Miami
GT
Lou

ACC Tobacco Road
UNC
NCSt
Duke
Wake

ACC Central
Pitt
UVa
VT
Clemson

- the 2 top division champs meet for ACCCG, which ensures a big-time matchup every year. The other 2 division winners get some upper bowl assurance

- ND and Texas (and everyone) will have 5 OOC games to schedule

ND
- Navy
- USC
- cupcake
- Shamrock Series
- rotate between Stanford, Purdue, and others

Texas
- OU
- A&M (will happen eventually)
- TT, Baylor, TCU, or big time opponent
- cupcake
- cupcake

- the 14 other ACC teams have a Week 2 game every year vs another ACC team which will NOT be a conference game

- here's what gets this deal done: ND and Texas get the TV rights to all home football games but have to share a portion of their revenue with the the other 14 (25%)

Sample Pitt schedule
Week 1 FCS
Week 2 ACC Non-con (either Syr, BC, 4 Carolinas, FSU, Miami, GT, Lou)
Week 3 WVU
Week 4 FBS cupcake
Week 5 FBS cupcake (or P5 opponent)

7 ACC games

The ACC is going to have to be very creative if Texas is shopping around. It cannot afford to have the SEC and B10 form super conferences
I do agree with you about getting creative to get ND and Texas into the conference for all sports.
 
you lost me at adding Texas and ND lol. yeah, lets do that. might as well see if we can add the cowboys and steelers too while we are at it..
- read further, allow them to keep their TV deals and limit the conference season to 7 games so they have enough OOC flexibility
 
More OOC games is the exact opposite of the way the P5 is trending but we wouldn't expect you to know that as a Robert Morris fan.
acc needs to go to 9 conference games and join the rest of the College football world. get more content for the ACCN. we dont need to play new hampshire, directional michigan and umass all in the same year. that doesnt need to happen, no one wants this..
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittdan77
The more regional sports conferences are the better. Cheaper to fund. Better rivalries. Better build up of us vs you for national games.

Selling out for $$$ brings you national teams and college football dies overall
 
4 divisions of 4 ACC teams.
9 conference games.
You play your 3 and two of the other 3 divisions.
This way you play every team at least every other year.
Now, how do you crown a champ, IDK?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xslfyk4
I don't get how you're determining the top two division winners. I assume you're using division record and then CFP ranking to break the inevitably frequent ties that would occur. Both seem mighty flawed when considering how different the schedules would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USN_Panther
More OOC games is the exact opposite of the way the P5 is trending but we wouldn't expect you to know that as a Robert Morris fan.
Ya think? Wow, you're smart. And we have a 0.00000000000% chance to land Texas or ND with 9 conference games and a 0.00000001% chance with 8. With 7, maybe we have a 10% chance.
 
I don't get how you're determining the top two division winners. I assume you're using division record and then CFP ranking to break the inevitably frequent ties that would occur. Both seem mighty flawed when considering how different the schedules would be.
- best division record

Tiebreakers:
1. Head to head
2. CFP rank
 
It'd be a wrap. Here's my way outside the box plan (which is what will be needed when the Big Ten and SEC attempt to form super-conferences)

- add Texas and ND
- switch to a 7 game conference schedule with 4 4-team divisions
- play everyone in your division and then 1 game vs 2 other divisions, 2 games vs the last division

ACC North
ND
Texas
Syr
BC

- ND and Texas get to play every year, gets them 2 games they will win 8-9 out of 10 years in major Northeast media markets (if we count NYC for Syracuse)

ACC South
FSU
Miami
GT
Lou

ACC Tobacco Road
UNC
NCSt
Duke
Wake

ACC Central
Pitt
UVa
VT
Clemson

- the 2 top division champs meet for ACCCG, which ensures a big-time matchup every year. The other 2 division winners get some upper bowl assurance

- ND and Texas (and everyone) will have 5 OOC games to schedule

ND
- Navy
- USC
- cupcake
- Shamrock Series
- rotate between Stanford, Purdue, and others

Texas
- OU
- A&M (will happen eventually)
- TT, Baylor, TCU, or big time opponent
- cupcake
- cupcake

- the 14 other ACC teams have a Week 2 game every year vs another ACC team which will NOT be a conference game

- here's what gets this deal done: ND and Texas get the TV rights to all home football games but have to share a portion of their revenue with the the other 14 (25%)

Sample Pitt schedule
Week 1 FCS
Week 2 ACC Non-con (either Syr, BC, 4 Carolinas, FSU, Miami, GT, Lou)
Week 3 WVU
Week 4 FBS cupcake
Week 5 FBS cupcake (or P5 opponent)

7 ACC games

The ACC is going to have to be very creative if Texas is shopping around. It cannot afford to have the SEC and B10 form super conferences
Ok, now back to Chick fil a...
 
It'd be a wrap. Here's my way outside the box plan (which is what will be needed when the Big Ten and SEC attempt to form super-conferences)

- add Texas and ND
- switch to a 7 game conference schedule with 4 4-team divisions
- play everyone in your division and then 1 game vs 2 other divisions, 2 games vs the last division

ACC North
ND
Texas
Syr
BC

- ND and Texas get to play every year, gets them 2 games they will win 8-9 out of 10 years in major Northeast media markets (if we count NYC for Syracuse)

ACC South
FSU
Miami
GT
Lou

ACC Tobacco Road
UNC
NCSt
Duke
Wake

ACC Central
Pitt
UVa
VT
Clemson

- the 2 top division champs meet for ACCCG, which ensures a big-time matchup every year. The other 2 division winners get some upper bowl assurance

- ND and Texas (and everyone) will have 5 OOC games to schedule

ND
- Navy
- USC
- cupcake
- Shamrock Series
- rotate between Stanford, Purdue, and others

Texas
- OU
- A&M (will happen eventually)
- TT, Baylor, TCU, or big time opponent
- cupcake
- cupcake

- the 14 other ACC teams have a Week 2 game every year vs another ACC team which will NOT be a conference game

- here's what gets this deal done: ND and Texas get the TV rights to all home football games but have to share a portion of their revenue with the the other 14 (25%)

Sample Pitt schedule
Week 1 FCS
Week 2 ACC Non-con (either Syr, BC, 4 Carolinas, FSU, Miami, GT, Lou)
Week 3 WVU
Week 4 FBS cupcake
Week 5 FBS cupcake (or P5 opponent)

7 ACC games

The ACC is going to have to be very creative if Texas is shopping around. It cannot afford to have the SEC and B10 form super conferences

Screen_Shot_2020-07-24_at_11.33.38_AM.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mikefln
I can't wait to read phase 2 of this genius plan where we use this success to land Alabama, Manchester City, 2003 USC, and the 1992 Dream Team.
 
Texas would go for this division when hell freezes over.
Cowboys - division with Phi, DC, NY/NJ
Missouri - SEC East
Stanford/Cal - North
Col/Utah - South

Its necessary to do this sometimes. Texas and ND would want to be in the same division and this gives them 2 cupcakes in major Northeast media markets and almost ensures the Texas/ND winner always plays in the ACCCG
 
Cowboys - division with Phi, DC, NY/NJ
Missouri - SEC East
Stanford/Cal - North
Col/Utah - South

Its necessary to do this sometimes. Texas and ND would want to be in the same division and this gives them 2 cupcakes in major Northeast media markets and almost ensures the Texas/ND winner always plays in the ACCCG
You nailed it!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT