The fact that ANY on here have the audacity to claim Hurley wouldn't have been a significant upgrade over Jeff Capel need to quit sniffin the glue. Jeff Capel had a surprisingly nice season. And the only reason he had it was because Hugley decided to eat his way off the team after his injury. Pitt was all set even though they got all these new portal players to continue to run their boring plodding offense through Hugley. It wasn't until Hugley got benched for good and left that Pitt figured out there was a much better approach. It was a miracle and yes I'm calling it that, that Pitt had the season they did. They hit the jackpot on a bunch of players in the portal.
In any event, Hurley by now would have recruited a lot better, gotten so much more out his kids than Capel has(except for this past season) and would have had Pitt in multiple NCAA Tournaments with a most likely Sweet 16 appearance and possibly higher. I mean year 5 of Dan Hurley here at Pitt? Probably 1 NIT early on and I would wager 3 NCAA Tournament appearances with 1 fairly deep run.
Is Hurley an arrogant ass? Sure? Is he easy to despise? Of course. But it's not even close to who the better coach is between him and Capel. And you'd know he'd have a pretty nice staff in place too.
So please just stop with the nonsense that Hurley would have struggled here. What a load of crap. Would he maybe leave after 5, 6 seasons? Who knows but it's possible. But he would have made Pitt fans forget about the Stallings era really quick.