I doubt that could/would ever happen, assuming you mean 0-8 in ACC football BC and 0-18 in ACC hoops BC. Could you imagine the boards then?It won't be long now until we become BC
I doubt that could/would ever happen, assuming you mean 0-8 in ACC football BC and 0-18 in ACC hoops BC. Could you imagine the boards then?It won't be long now until we become BC
I stand corrected.Get your Arkansas straight, we didn't play Arkansas State, we played the University of Central Arkansas Bears.![]()
Come on, don't be a bozo. There is a huge gap between where we are and where they are. We have been trending flat the last few years, not down, just on the verge of March Madness. We are a couple of players away, not a blow up the entire program away.
It was a joke. That's why he put an emoji. Larn u sum txtng.I stand corrected.
But.......... So What.
Would being correct on the name of an obscure team from an obscure state have made my point any more or less valid?
But thanks for the correction.
You would be wrong, but that's fine. That's why we live in America.Absolutely disagree.
You would be wrong, but that's fine. That's why we live in America.
Well, I posted like 3 points, and you said flatly you disagreed, which meant you disagreed with everything. Clearly then, you must also think we are on the path of becoming BC. Why do you think that? I think we're not because there a big difference between going to the NIT and being BC. I also posted I don't think we need to blow up the whole program. You disagreed, so tell me why you think we need to blow up the whole program, since you "disagreed".There he is.
I'm not wrong. It depends on your frame of reference. We are trending down if look at 2009-2010 as the peak. I'm willing to ignore a poor year or two but after reaching the sweet 16 several times this will be the 7th season in a row we haven't. That is trending down.
Well, I posted like 3 points, and you said flatly you disagreed, which meant you disagreed with everything. Clearly then, you must also think we are on the path of becoming BC. Why do you think that? I think we're not because there a big difference between going to the NIT and being BC. I also posted I don't think we need to blow up the whole program. You disagreed, so tell me why you think we need to blow up the whole program, since you "disagreed".
You are correct.
Absolutely means you couldn't disagree more with the whole thing. You know that, right? Absolutely. Absolutely. The word absolutely. That is pretty precise. Absolutely.I said absolutely not flatly if we are going to state everything in literal terms. I disagree with the assertion we aren't sliding backwards.
Absolutely means you couldn't disagree more with the whole thing. You know that, right? Absolutely. Absolutely. The word absolutely. That is pretty precise. Absolutely.
Randy Juhl didn't fire Pederson either. That was entirely the Chancellor. Juhl is a great guy, but he wasn't there to cut heads he was just there to steer the ship.
You are the one saying I shouldn't take the "absolutely" literally. Holy cow indeed.Holy cow, ok man.
You are the one saying I shouldn't take the "absolutely" literally. Holy cow indeed.
I said it wasn't a big deal (i said it was fine you disagreed with my whole post) in my first reply to you, then you got smart. I agree, no big deal. Maybe next time, instead of just flatly saying you absolutely disagree to the whole post, say what you disagree with. Not many more words, but saves these unfortunate disagreements between two posters who really have most stuff in common. I nearly always agree with what you write. NearlyI wasn't following the entire back and forth between you. I "absolutely" disagreed with the assertion that we weren't sliding back and trending even. That's it, it isn't a big deal.
Would being correct on the name of an obscure team from an obscure state have made my point any more or less valid?
Probably why Dixon did not schedule Arkansas StateArkansas State would have actually been better. Not a lot, but a little.
well kiwi you know I'm not one, I've been saying JD needed to go for a good 2 years at least. You and I had some conversations over the fact I want a change and you don't. How are you feeling about JD now do you think he should be kept or be fire?Who has actually posted that he or she loved Jamie? Why can't anyone answer that? Why do people often have to resort to hyperbole if there is actual factual data to use? Hyperbole usually indicates to me a person who has a weak argument, has low intelligence, or both.
It's a fruitless discussion (though one frequently posted about). He won't be fired. However, I think in the short term kept and make other changes. I have posted that in other threads.well kiwi you know I'm not one, I've been saying JD needed to go for a good 2 years at least. You and I had some conversations over the fact I want a change and you don't. How are you feeling about JD now do you think he should be kept or be fire?
And it had to be true if it's in the newspaper. Right Copernicus?And that was denied as false by Pitt , unless you thought they were lying.
Try looking next time instead of assuming.Never saw Pitt deny it ..... source ?
Try looking next time instead of assuming.
And it had to be true if it's in the newspaper. Right Copernicus?
(On a Steve Pederson buyout): "...I will say that the reporting that I've seen widely is very inaccurate in this case...The terms that we exercised were the ones that were already in the contract. There was no negotiation at this point to do anything other than that."
From Patrick Gallagher's interview
And you board jackals will slink away if Pitt wins. Just as happened when we beat Duke.Nah most of the Jamie lovers will be AWOL until the next Pitt win. Then they'll all be out in full force insulting anyone that dare criticize the man. You'll see.
I didn't slink away at all. I was shocked and happy that Pitt beat Duke convincingly. Unfortunately, the team did nothing to build on that win and that's super frustrating.And you board jackals will slink away if Pitt wins. Just as happened when we beat Duke.
Unacceptable to you?? Who cares? No one is happy...but most of us are willing to let the guy turn it around. Are YOU gonna fund the buyout??? Will YOU buy a few hundred season tix?? Ever hear of Paul Evans??Dixon's contract has a reduction clause that kicks in if he accepts employment in his profession-i.e. If his salary continuation is $2.75 million and he gets a job coaching Our Lady of Mediocrity for $750K, then Pitt pays him the difference or $2million. His ego will not allow him to sit,so there will be some reduction in the salary "guarantee." Even the most ardent Dixon apologist has to accept how far the program has fallen since 2009.. We used to challenge for conference championships and a high seed in the NCAA. Now-20plus wins against an unattractive nonconf schedule AND mediocrity in the conference AND FIGHTING TO BE THE 62,63 or 64th team in the US is viewed as acceptable. I am betting on that NOT being the case with the new administration. Dixon is out next year if not sooner!! And, he should be --at what we are paying him. This level of continued performance is unacceptable. Period.
There was no negotiation because they paid him precisely what they owed him for the unexpired term of his contract- 4 years at $500k per year or $2m smackers . Thank you, NerdyThanks Souf ..... appreciate your finding a good source on the subject.
Yeah, none of us are here right now. I wonder who he thinks slinked away? Those GD "Jamie Lovers". I hate those guys with a passion, whoever and wherever they are.And you board jackals will slink away if Pitt wins. Just as happened when we beat Duke.
I don't think so!And you board jackals will slink away if Pitt wins. Just as happened when we beat Duke.
I guess you didn't see good teams in 2011 & 2014?? There are speed bumps.....next year we start the upswing. Hell, maybe tomorrow.NC"
I don't think so!
I love your ridiculous labels!
I'm not a board jackal but I am a PITT fan and I want a future for PITT basketball.
I've seen enough since 2010 and even after the Duke win I think Dixon needs a
change and so do we!
One on two off one on two off etc.
NCAAT- 1 one and out and the remainder 2 and out since 2010
No quality recruits since 2010
Losses at The Pete that didn't happen before- fyi I love The Cathedral not Cathy
Pitt basketball fans bailing on season tickets
Low attendance at The Pete
Loss of a portion of the fanbase
The team looks Dixon isn't impacting them much
One players comment summed it up "we played hard at the Duke game for JRob"?
?-Why don't you play hard for Dixon every game? Answer- He doesn't motivate players
or relate well to todays recruits!
etc
Even if we make a run in the tourney I still think its time for a change for both Dixon and PITT fans.
If Dixon stays to the end of his contract term the PITT Basketball Brand will be significantly damaged!
Its over!
We'll see. How did we do in the NCAA T in 2011 and 2014?I guess you didn't see good teams in 2011 & 2014?? There are speed bumps.....next year we start the upswing. Hell, maybe tomorrow.