Great site and host for the NCAA tourney. It is going to come back in 2 years and I hear Pittsburgh is getting serious consideration for a regional finals.
So well done folks.
So well done folks.
Curious where you are hearing about Regional Finals. Through 2025 it seems like most regional sites are in cities that are a bit above Pittsburghs population. But that would be super cool if it happened.Great site and host for the NCAA tourney. It is going to come back in 2 years and I hear Pittsburgh is getting serious consideration for a regional finals.
So well done folks.
Yea at one time it was did that PittsburghCurious where you are hearing about Regional Finals. Through 2025 it seems like most regional sites are in cities that are a bit above Pittsburghs population. But that would be super cool if it happened.
PPG holds more fans than three of the four sites for this year..not sure why a 19,500+ seat arena sold out in Pittsburgh should be any different than a 19,500+ seat arena sold out in Philadelphia but I guess it is.. This year's San Antonio is not exactly Mexico City in terms of population...Curious where you are hearing about Regional Finals. Through 2025 it seems like most regional sites are in cities that are a bit above Pittsburghs population. But that would be super cool if it happened.
not sure how Pittsburgh lacks the hotel capacity any more than Louisville or Kansans City which are two near future sites...in the age of the AirBnb types of the world this becomes a more and more moot point by the powers that be... As far as the 40,000-50,000 fans go, that pales in comparison to the weekend at Oakmont for a US Open.Yeah, there have been articles on this over the years. Essentially, the NCAA reps say something like they love Pittsburgh as a site and "in spirit" would love to see them get a Regionals, but we fall short on some criteria. Like others, I am not sure what that criteria is...PPG is a reasonably sized arena with infrastructure around it for parking, public transportation, etc. I suppose their could be some better dining options around it, but I really don't think that is a big factor. Lack of hotel room is often mentioned in events discussions for Pittsburgh in general, so that may well be it. While the arena only seats 19,000 people, given them different teams and different sessions, probably more like 40,000-50,000 fans coming to town, plus all the support people, media, etc.
However, we have been adding hotel space in the area, so maybe the NCAA would throw Pittsburgh a bone and give them a Regional as a reward for all the great Rounds 1/2 we host.
Maybe it's because it's not a big basketball town. When Pitt was good, the Pete was full, if Pitt was good and played at the Igloo or PPG, it was full. so even with less basketball interest, you have one big event in a year, people who care about basketball turn out.I'm always pleasantly surprised how well people turn out for the tournament here since it's not a big basketball town to put it nicely. I wonder how many are people driving in from Baltimore/DC/Cleveland/Detroit/Columbus/Philly since we're not that far from those locations.
I'd love a regional finals here someday but PPG Paints is not really a great place to watch basketball. IDK exactly what it is but the angles just feel weird.
I always wonder how things would have worked out if Pittsburgh got a NBA team in 1967 instead of a NHL team since both leagues expanded that year.Pittsburgh also ended up as a Hockey Town by a perfect storm of events, the ABA failed here, and the Pens almost failed 40 years ago, if Mario, Jagr, Sid, Malkin, MAF etc. don't all by some miracle land here and win almost as many Cups as the the Stillers have Lombardis, I doubt it's a hockey town. When I was a kid in the 70s, NOBODY I knew watched or played hockey period. Yes I know some of you had a different experience, that was mine.
As far as hotel space goes, there are no more hotels needed for regionals than first round, since the same number of fans would be attending for either event.Yeah, there have been articles on this over the years. Essentially, the NCAA reps say something like they love Pittsburgh as a site and "in spirit" would love to see them get a Regionals, but we fall short on some criteria. Like others, I am not sure what that criteria is...PPG is a reasonably sized arena with infrastructure around it for parking, public transportation, etc. I suppose their could be some better dining options around it, but I really don't think that is a big factor. Lack of hotel room is often mentioned in events discussions for Pittsburgh in general, so that may well be it. While the arena only seats 19,000 people, given them different teams and different sessions, probably more like 40,000-50,000 fans coming to town, plus all the support people, media, etc.
However, we have been adding hotel space in the area, so maybe the NCAA would throw Pittsburgh a bone and give them a Regional as a reward for all the great Rounds 1/2 we host.
Perhaps by the time a regional final comes here, the lower hill development project will have progressed? That’d help with hotel options as well as entertainment/gathering spots before and after games. Could become similar to KC’s Power and Light District.Yeah, there have been articles on this over the years. Essentially, the NCAA reps say something like they love Pittsburgh as a site and "in spirit" would love to see them get a Regionals, but we fall short on some criteria. Like others, I am not sure what that criteria is...PPG is a reasonably sized arena with infrastructure around it for parking, public transportation, etc. I suppose their could be some better dining options around it, but I really don't think that is a big factor. Lack of hotel room is often mentioned in events discussions for Pittsburgh in general, so that may well be it. While the arena only seats 19,000 people, given them different teams and different sessions, probably more like 40,000-50,000 fans coming to town, plus all the support people, media, etc.
However, we have been adding hotel space in the area, so maybe the NCAA would throw Pittsburgh a bone and give them a Regional as a reward for all the great Rounds 1/2 we host.
Or the original 1960 expansion. Pittsburgh was announced as an expansion site then, but the guy who was awarded the franchise backed out. The other expansion team was the current-day Washington Wizards, but they struggled in Chicago for the first two years of their existence before relocating to Baltimore.I always wonder how things would have worked out if Pittsburgh got a NBA team in 1967 instead of a NHL team since both leagues expanded that year.
The whole Pittsburgh Pipers ABA thing was weird. It was never ever on local TV, as far as I remember, I don't think I ever saw it- I would of watched, I loved basketball at that time. So the first year of the ABA, Pittsburgh wins the first championship- with Hall of Famer Connie Hawkins no less, then immediately moves to Minnesota, but just for one year, then returns to Pittsburgh, but that never worked out and folded after a few years. I was only like 8-12 during the Pittsburgh ABA era, so I don't have a clue about it? They where league champs, but apparently not popular and the move to Minnesota and back in a year, that's weird. Since it seemed to get zero coverage, I kind of get why it failed, it's just weird.Or the original 1960 expansion. Pittsburgh was announced as an expansion site then, but the guy who was awarded the franchise backed out. The other expansion team was the current-day Washington Wizards, but they struggled in Chicago for the first two years of their existence before relocating to Baltimore.
Interesting, I had no idea about that. I did recall that the Pittsburgh Ironmen were part of the inaugural season of the predecessor to the NBA. Seemed like they tried many times to make basketball work in Pittsburgh.Or the original 1960 expansion. Pittsburgh was announced as an expansion site then, but the guy who was awarded the franchise backed out. The other expansion team was the current-day Washington Wizards, but they struggled in Chicago for the first two years of their existence before relocating to Baltimore.
What I remember about the Pipers experience was this: In that first season, while the numbers were mediocre in comparison to the NBA, the Pipers led the league in attendance. However, the league had tapped George Mikan as its commissioner (trying to get a recognizable name to lend it credibility), and the league was operating out of Mikan's law offices in Minneapolis. Despite their success on the court and decent (relatively speaking) performance at the box office, Pipers owner Gabe Rubin was in over his head financially. Following that first season, the Minnesota franchise moved to Miami, so there was pressure to move a replacement team to the league's headquarters city. So, Rubin sold the Pipers to a group who moved the team to Minnesota. That lasted just one year, and finding no success there, that ownership group sold the team to a guy named Mark Binstein, who moved it back to Pittsburgh. However, having been p*ssed off by the move to Minnesota in the first place, the fans never embraced the return.The whole Pittsburgh Pipers ABA thing was weird. It was never ever on local TV, as far as I remember, I don't think I ever saw it- I would of watched, I loved basketball at that time. So the first year of the ABA, Pittsburgh wins the first championship- with Hall of Famer Connie Hawkins no less, then immediately moves to Minnesota, but just for one year, then returns to Pittsburgh, but that never worked out and folded after a few years. I was only like 8-12 during the Pittsburgh ABA era, so I don't have a clue about it? They where league champs, but apparently not popular and the move to Minnesota and back in a year, that's weird. Since it seemed to get zero coverage, I kind of get why it failed, it's just weird.
Surprising about Nova. I went the one year they were here and Nova fans were everywhere.I was at all 6. All games completely packed. I unfortunately Stubhub'd mine and ticket prices were astronomical....and for all non-brand teams. Also, neither OSU or Nova traveled well so it was mostly Yinzers.
For whatever reason, Pgh is one of the very best NCAA Tournament towns. I was jealous that the Buffalo games were going for $6 uppers and $14 lowers. Then I turn it on and the upper deck is half empty. Pgh loves the NCAA Tournament.
Also, a ton of people wearing Pitt fans. My friend said that wondered if Pitt fans are so starved for college basketball, they're coming to this.
They and OSU both had about 1500 or so.Surprising about Nova. I went the one year they were here and Nova fans were everywhere.
Great site and host for the NCAA tourney. It is going to come back in 2 years and I hear Pittsburgh is getting serious consideration for a regional finals.
So well done folks.
Move out of town just as you're supposed to be hanging a championship banner the next opening day doesn't exactly build momentum, then come back after a whole year?However, having been p*ssed off by the move to Minnesota in the first place, the fans never embraced the return.
I think I have come to two irrefutable truths about Pittsburgh sports fandom.Shows it's not a horrible basketball city, just hates horrible basketball.
The Pirates still have fans. As for the Steelers, almost every yellow seat that's empty is paid for, almost the whole thing is sold out in advance for the whole year, so it won't matter much unless people start abandoning seat licenses. I wonder more about the Pens, when they lose Sid, if the next Mario or Sid doesn't miraculously fall to them in an upcoming draft?I think I have come to two irrefutable truths about Pittsburgh sports fandom.
1. Pittsburgh sports fans support winners and run from losers.
2. Pittsburgh sports fans love an event. NCAA tournament. All Star Games. US Open.
I have a feeling the whole myth of Pittsburgh being this amazing sports town, especially as it relates to the Steelers, is going to be put to the test. The Steelers are on the cusp of some potential dark days ahead. Those blazing yellow seats will be on full display on Sundays if Mitch Trubisky isn’t a whole lot better than he was in Chicago.
That is my recollection as well. Had season tickets at the time and enjoyed the ride. Connie Hawkins, Chico Vaughn, Art Hayman, Tom Washington et all were very entertaining. I felt totally betrayed when they moved and they never gained traction with me when they returned.What I remember about the Pipers experience was this: In that first season, while the numbers were mediocre in comparison to the NBA, the Pipers led the league in attendance. However, the league had tapped George Mikan as its commissioner (trying to get a recognizable name to lend it credibility), and the league was operating out of Mikan's law offices in Minneapolis. Despite their success on the court and decent (relatively speaking) performance at the box office, Pipers owner Gabe Rubin was in over his head financially. Following that first season, the Minnesota franchise moved to Miami, so there was pressure to move a replacement team to the league's headquarters city. So, Rubin sold the Pipers to a group who moved the team to Minnesota. That lasted just one year, and finding no success there, that ownership group sold the team to a guy named Mark Binstein, who moved it back to Pittsburgh. However, having been p*ssed off by the move to Minnesota in the first place, the fans never embraced the return.
I’d bet the average age of Pirates fans is the oldest in MLB. Pirates support is literally dying. It’s been what, maybe a half dozen years since the Pirates averaged 20k a game, if you believe the attendance figures provided by the team.The Pirates still have fans. As for the Steelers, almost every yellow seat that's empty is paid for, almost the whole thing is sold out in advance for the whole year, so it won't matter much unless people start abandoning seat licenses. I wonder more about the Pens, when they lose Sid, if the next Mario or Sid doesn't miraculously fall to them in an upcoming draft?
You are assuming the split between locals and traveling fans is the same for those rounds. Still, we have plenty of big events at Heinz and they've had NHL and MLB all-star games here. I am not sure why that event would be unique.As far as hotel space goes, there are no more hotels needed for regionals than first round, since the same number of fans would be attending for either event.
I don’t know how the NCAA distributes tickets for the tournament, but it cannot be much different for different rounds. In any case, you are correct that there are other big events here, which do not seem to have a problem with hotel rooms.You are assuming the split between locals and traveling fans is the same for those rounds. Still, we have plenty of big events at Heinz and they've had NHL and MLB all-star games here. I am not sure why that event would be unique.
I would love to see a comparison of the growth of the populations of the metro areas for the Cubs, Braves, Astros, and SF in comparison to the growth in Western PA since the 70s. Yeah maybe attendance wasn't great for them back then, but relatively speaking it has to be a lot easier for those markets to fill the seats for not just their baseball teams but other sports teams nowadays in comparison to Pittsburgh. I would love to see an NBA team in Pittsburgh, I would buy season tickets, but I'm just not sure Pittsburgh is big enough to support the NBA on top of the existing pro landscape here.And let's also acknowledge in the 70's, teams like the Cubs, the Braves, Astros, Mets, SF etc... drew less than 10K per game in some years.
He's creepy.And the beaded buckeye dude was here. He and the rainbow head John 3:16 guy must be related somehow. Always at the big events with high visibility.
I don’t know how the NCAA distributes tickets for the tournament, but it cannot be much different for different rounds. In any case, you are correct that there are other big events here, which do not seem to have a problem with hotel rooms.
It should be fairly obvious to everyone that there is a reason the second weekend's tickets are more expensive: more fans want to buy them.IIRC, schools get something like 500 tickets for the first weekend's games and something like 1,200 for the second weekend's games.
Thanks. That means 4,000 out of town for the first round, and 4,800 for the second round. There are over 24,000 hotel rooms in the area. Hardly enough difference for hotel rooms to be a factor.IIRC, schools get something like 500 tickets for the first weekend's games and something like 1,200 for the second weekend's games.
That's why I find it funny to have expectations of Pitt filling Heinz Field every week, 40k is a huge crowd, I also like that in the 70s NOBODY CARED about the perception of seeing empty seats on TV.Let's also remember regarding Pro Basketball, the ABA was run on bandaids and duct tape. And the NBA until Bird/Magic came into the league, even with Dr J, the Celtics, Willis Reed, was as low rated as the NHL. It's finals were in a tape delay.
So judging Pittsburgh's attendance way back then is not fair, because that was true of most any pro basketball team. And let's also acknowledge in the 70's, teams like the Cubs, the Braves, Astros, Mets, SF etc... drew less than 10K per game in some years.
Attending sporting events didn't become a real matter of "civic duty" until well into the 80's.
I forget who the Pittsburgh reporter was, but had a classic lineI always wonder how things would have worked out if Pittsburgh got a NBA team in 1967 instead of a NHL team since both leagues expanded that year.
San Antonio is in the top 10 by population, I think. Pgh is all of 300,000.PPG holds more fans than three of the four sites for this year..not sure why a 19,500+ seat arena sold out in Pittsburgh should be any different than a 19,500+ seat arena sold out in Philadelphia but I guess it is.. This year's San Antonio is not exactly Mexico City in terms of population...
San Antonio and Pittsburgh's metro area's are pretty close, both are larger than Kansas City and Indianapolis though.San Antonio is in the top 10 by population, I think. Pgh is all of 300,000.
![]()
Top 300 Largest Cities in the U.S by Population 2023 - Moving.com
What did the recent population shifts look like and what do they mean for the future of the U.S. housing market? Read on to find out.www.moving.com