ADVERTISEMENT

Long live Benzhole

Many of you fit this description
Pitt's history of choking in consequential games deserved a short mention for context in his original story -- not the way Benz belabored it.

After all, do the media mention Jerry Sandusky every time Penn State gets a big win? Equal context would dictate that they should be mentioning how far they have come. But we all know the media doesn't do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HailToPitt725
I'd say they've been solidly average for most of the last 25. I can't say we've sucked too much since Harris took over. More winning seasons than losing ones in that stretch.

Before that, yes, completely sucked.
Dating back to ‘97, our regular season record is 169 wins and 137 losses. That’s not terrible.

I started post Johnny majors 2, which was undoubtedly an abomination of football.
 
Because I believe in criticizing things that I like when deserved

But you arent criticizing it, unless you are actually the repugnant writer being discussed here. Its a writer that means nothing. No idea where your belief system in critiquing things comes into play when discussing media being anti-Pitt. Are you saying that you scour the internet relentlessly looking for criticizing articles on everything because you believe so deeply in it? Thats BS

You have been all over the place on responses. It was simple. Pitt is playing well, Pitt should be given the respect in the local newspapers (since, you know, that is where the bulk of the fans reside) for doing so. That is the argument. Why are you debating it? Of course it is correct to say what I just said.

By the way, still awaiting all the Pitt posters calling for the local media to have more negativity toward Pitt that you said was happening.

You take a stance in this thread, back up your stance instead of tap dancing away, or throwing up wild freedom of speech garbage.
 
But you arent criticizing it, unless you are actually the repugnant writer being discussed here. Its a writer that means nothing. No idea where your belief system in critiquing things comes into play when discussing media being anti-Pitt. Are you saying that you scour the internet relentlessly looking for criticizing articles on everything because you believe so deeply in it? Thats BS

You have been all over the place on responses. It was simple. Pitt is playing well, Pitt should be given the respect in the local newspapers (since, you know, that is where the bulk of the fans reside) for doing so. That is the argument. Why are you debating it? Of course it is correct to say what I just said.

By the way, still awaiting all the Pitt posters calling for the local media to have more negativity toward Pitt that you said was happening.

You take a stance in this thread, back up your stance instead of tap dancing away, or throwing up wild freedom of speech garbage.
I don't think he's being "anti" Pitt. being "anti" is your perception. Most of the things he says, I was thinking in advance.
 
Pitt has to have the fans with the largest inferiority complex and woe are us attitude in the country.
Based on what? Just because Pitt fans want and expect certain things? Why are you even on a Pitt board if fans are so insecure?
 
But you arent criticizing it, unless you are actually the repugnant writer being discussed here. Its a writer that means nothing. No idea where your belief system in critiquing things comes into play when discussing media being anti-Pitt. Are you saying that you scour the internet relentlessly looking for criticizing articles on everything because you believe so deeply in it? Thats BS

You have been all over the place on responses. It was simple. Pitt is playing well, Pitt should be given the respect in the local newspapers (since, you know, that is where the bulk of the fans reside) for doing so. That is the argument. Why are you debating it? Of course it is correct to say what I just said.

By the way, still awaiting all the Pitt posters calling for the local media to have more negativity toward Pitt that you said was happening.

You take a stance in this thread, back up your stance instead of tap dancing away, or throwing up wild freedom of speech garbage.

He always moves the goalposts, he has to.
 
He didn't say anything critical. Not that I read. It's totally valid and deserved to bring up failures in similar situations the last 20 years, that's good journalism.
Then every time we mention the media on here, let's note what their respective readership, circulation and newsroom staffing was 20 years ago. LMAO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JS School
I love how every one is ready to say “same old pitt” after our next loss. Writers are setting up the narrative, posters are preparing for it.

Let me break it now for you guys. Pitt football will eventually lose a football game. It’s going to happen eventually. It happens in sports sometimes, a team does end up losing on occasion.

Pitt could go 10-2, win the conference but that one loss will trigger the local media hacks to come out if the woodwork and jump all over that loss. No matter how far down the road it comes.
 
..... and you are Anti-Pitt
I'm one of Pitt's biggest fans. You're NOBODY to judge who's anti Pitt and who isn't. Just because you're dressed in your cheerleader skirt holding your pom poms doesn't make you a better fan.
 
I love how every one is ready to say “same old pitt” after our next loss. Writers are setting up the narrative, posters are preparing for it.

Let me break it now for you guys. Pitt football will eventually lose a football game. It’s going to happen eventually. It happens in sports sometimes, a team does end up losing on occasion.

Pitt could go 10-2, win the conference but that one loss will trigger the local media hacks to come out if the woodwork and jump all over that loss. No matter how far down the road it comes.
I think, if they actually go 10-2, in that case it's not "same old", but let's say they collapse to 8-4, then they deserve being bashed unmercifully.
 
I think, if they actually go 10-2, in that case it's not "same old", but let's say they collapse to 8-4, then they deserve being bashed unmercifully.
Going 2-3 in the last 5, I’ll grab the pitchfork and join you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitt79
I love how every one is ready to say “same old pitt” after our next loss. Writers are setting up the narrative, posters are preparing for it.

Let me break it now for you guys. Pitt football will eventually lose a football game. It’s going to happen eventually. It happens in sports sometimes, a team does end up losing on occasion.

Pitt could go 10-2, win the conference but that one loss will trigger the local media hacks to come out if the woodwork and jump all over that loss. No matter how far down the road it comes.
Those articles are already written and saved on the desktop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeldas Open Roof
Those articles are already written and saved on the desktop.
...and why not, until Pitt breaks that mold and has even just one season, where they don't "Pitt", even in Wanny's 10 win season, they went from 9-1 to 9-3 and lost the conference before getting win #10 in the CareCare Bowl! So yes, it was the only 10 win season in 35 years, but it felt deflating at the end.
 
-There's always people here asking for coverage and then complaining if it's not butt kissing of Pitt

-Some of you often PERCIEVE negativity, when there is NONE

-Perv State DESERVES more positive coverage based on on field performance most of the last 30 years

-No, you can be a fan, post on a message board and NOT BE A BUTT KISSING HOMER

-I read all the media about Pitt, I can agree or disagree, and leave it at that, never get mad about what they say

The definitely is a bias. Remember a few years ago when Jay Paterno sent a letter to Urban about coaching at OSU? It's was a NATIONAL story. Covered on ESPN. The other PA papers covered it. The PG sports editor said it wasn't a story. Why, oh why, would that be???
 
The definitely is a bias. Remember a few years ago when Jay Paterno sent a letter to Urban about coaching at OSU? It's was a NATIONAL story. Covered on ESPN. The other PA papers covered it. The PG sports editor said it wasn't a story. Why, oh why, would that be???
So they are biased for not covering it? And really, it's not a story, an assistant coach writes a letter trying to get a job with a head coach somewhere? So what? Just because it's JoePa's boy we should care?
 
So they are biased for not covering it? And really, it's not a story, an assistant coach writes a letter trying to get a job with a head coach somewhere? So what? Just because it's JoePa's boy we should care?

Again, it was a NATIONAL story. But... not in Pgh. Please. Take off the blinders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pierre93
Well, nowhere in that piece did he say he hated Pitt and wanted them to fail. He said there are Pitt football fans who are not living in reality, which is the same thing that people on here say about Penn State fans all of the time. Being annoyed with something is not the same as hating it and wanting it to fail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitt79
Based on what? Just because Pitt fans want and expect certain things? Why are you even on a Pitt board if fans are so insecure?
Well, nowhere in that piece did he say he hated Pitt and wanted them to fail. He said there are Pitt football fans who are not living in reality, which is the same thing that people on here say about Penn State fans all of the time. Being annoyed with something is not the same as hating it and wanting it to fail.
I read his column today, not the previous one.
 
Well, nowhere in that piece did he say he hated Pitt and wanted them to fail. He said there are Pitt football fans who are not living in reality, which is the same thing that people on here say about Penn State fans all of the time. Being annoyed with something is not the same as hating it and wanting it to fail.

You're right, the comments were a true love letter to Pitt football, how could I interpret it so incorrectly.
 
If you don't think 93.7 The fan continues to take shots at Pitt then you aren't paying attention. Why when st penn or wvcc shit the bed it's not reported on??? I can tell some of you who debate this and favor midget Benz that HL, EJ, Duzz can't take their shtick too much more. St. Penn is a national joke but will never ever own the disgrace they deserve in the Pittsburgh area. When a local media person Ron Cook voted for JW over Fitz that's all u need to know.
Now go ahead and say we wave pom poms pop!!! H2P!
 
Here’s the problem with the Pittsburgh media. They basically ignored the biggest scandal in the history of college football at Penn St, but then will send multiple reporters to cover their white out game. When PS basketball sucks you hear crickets, but on the rare occasion they are good they receive front page coverage. The same thing can be applied to WVU. They received front page coverage when they were good, but you hear crickets now that they are mediocre. That in a nutshell is the problem.
 
Here’s the problem with the Pittsburgh media. They basically ignored the biggest scandal in the history of college football at Penn St, but then will send multiple reporters to cover their white out game. When PS basketball sucks you hear crickets, but on the rare occasion they are good they receive front page coverage. The same thing can be applied to WVU. They received front page coverage when they were good, but you hear crickets now that they are mediocre. That in a nutshell is the problem.
Nailed it Sauce!!!
 
Blinders? It's just that I really DON'T CARE! It's not that big a deal.
Well I complain about it slot and in the grand scheme of life, no it’s not that big of a deal.

I just feel like pitt has enough going against it so the very few times that things are going well, having the local media and the hosts on our own flagship station mocking the program and taking shots is annoying.

It’s not their job to be cheerleaders but just relax on the never ending back handed compliments and talking about losses from 2009.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pierre93
Well I complain about it slot and in the grand scheme of life, no it’s not that big of a deal.

I just feel like pitt has enough going against it so the very few times that things are going well, having the local media and the hosts on our own flagship station mocking the program and taking shots is annoying.

It’s not their job to be cheerleaders but just relax on the never ending back handed compliments and talking about losses from 2009.
The thing is, I don't mind them saying the stuff that I'm thinking myself, I don't really want reality covered up.
 
If you don't think 93.7 The fan continues to take shots at Pitt then you aren't paying attention. Why when st penn or wvcc shit the bed it's not reported on??? I can tell some of you who debate this and favor midget Benz that HL, EJ, Duzz can't take their shtick too much more. St. Penn is a national joke but will never ever own the disgrace they deserve in the Pittsburgh area. When a local media person Ron Cook voted for JW over Fitz that's all u need to know.
Now go ahead and say we wave pom poms pop!!! H2P!
Beat me to punch on this one. The perfect example of how the media treats PITT was (Richard Cranium) Ron Cook not voting Fitz for Heisman. Show me an another city where the local media did not vote for a local player who was a Heisman candidate?
 
Beat me to punch on this one. The perfect example of how the media treats PITT was (Richard Cranium) Ron Cook not voting Fitz for Heisman. Show me an another city where the local media did not vote for a local player who was a Heisman candidate?
Exactly 💯 that's reality!
 
Some negative nellies feel the need to live in past and not present. The present has us 6-1 ranked 17th and some on here still want to bring up our past failures. They must be very miserable and unhappy with their lives smh.
 
Some negative nellies feel the need to live in past and not present. The present has us 6-1 ranked 17th and some on here still want to bring up our past failures. They must be very miserable and unhappy with their lives smh.

Cook sits in obscure suburban bars by himself every night, of course he is miserable and unhappy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farnox and pierre93
...and why not, until Pitt breaks that mold and has even just one season, where they don't "Pitt", even in Wanny's 10 win season, they went from 9-1 to 9-3 and lost the conference before getting win #10 in the CareCare Bowl! So yes, it was the only 10 win season in 35 years, but it felt deflating at the end.
You struggle with context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainMurphy
You struggle with context.
I just don't care, everything I said there is true, their only 10 win season in 35 years was basically a letdown when it ended, it was like "well at least they finally pulled out the 10th win-what a relief " you just want fairy tales like as if it's been great and we should cover up the 30 of the last 35 years that where very mediocre where "Pitting" was rampant and constant;.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT