Short of having a 16 team double elimination, this is what we have, and even then, the best team still might not win. The Yankees didn't win in 1960, and that was a best of seven.Lots of high seeds losing to lower seeds, some much lower. It happens to the best of them. It's also why the NCAAT is a flawed system for selecting a NC. The best team seldom wins it all. Just the hottest, luckiest team.
Short of having a 16 team double elimination, this is what we have, and even then, the best team still might not win. The Yankees didn't win in 1960, and that was a best of seven.[
I'm going to have to disagree considering a #1 seed has won 20/33 Championships since 1985 (29/33 for seeds 1-3), that 32 of the 66 teams that appeared in a championship game were #1 seeds (54/66 were 1-3 seeds). I'd say the tourney has been pretty solid at rewarding the best teams.Lots of high seeds losing to lower seeds, some much lower. It happens to the best of them. It's also why the NCAAT is a flawed system for selecting a NC. The best team seldom wins it all. Just the hottest, luckiest team.
The best team is determined on the playing field/floor/ice, not by some silly metric calculation. That is why the games are played. For those 7 games, the Pirates were the best team.
They were better in 4 of those games but for the series they were out scored 55-27. It's ok to be more lucky than good.