You must not know what the SEC is.You obviously don't have a real team if your football coach has to answer to the athletic director.
You must not know what the SEC is.You obviously don't have a real team if your football coach has to answer to the athletic director.
You aren’t showing much intelligence in this threadIt's about time. Some have zero understanding of corporate hierarchies work. No weird corner. Just typical yinzer bull.
This myth that recruiting plummets if Narduzzi doesn’t get an extension is absolutely ridiculous. If Saban or Dabo announce today that this is their last season as HC, I would bet everything I own that their recruiting doesn’t plummet. Kids at Pitt realize they haven’t won a thing except a tie breaker which granted them a pass to get slaughtered by Clemson on National TV. The Narduzzi era has been an underwhelming failure in just about every measure imaginableso what would you have done? You have two choices, extend or cut loose? Cause if you don't extend, you leave him withering on the vine and you will have to cut loose in two years since recruiting would plummet.
So tell, you're the AD, what do you do after the 2017 season?
Chryst got Rushel Shell, Jordan Whitehead and Dorian Johnson all to commit and they were all considered 5 stars by one or more recruiting service. How many 5 stars has Narduzzi got to commit? You’re absolutely right here.Extending Narduzzi was a pretty bad idea, but Lyke has done great in every other aspect. Also, it was a tough situation for the reasons mentioned above.
That said, there are still WAYYYY too many people defending Narduzzi. He is a failure, who's best two years were built on the back of players from the previous coach.
Attacking me doesn't negate argument. Can you do better?You aren’t showing much intelligence in this thread
No needAttacking me doesn't negate argument. Can you do better?
Chryst got Rushel Shell, Jordan Whitehead and Dorian Johnson all to commit and they were all considered 5 stars by one or more recruiting service. How many 5 stars has Narduzzi got to commit? You’re absolutely right here.
Exactly. Many forget that Conner was a DE that Chryst turned into an ACC Player of the Year Running back in 1 season. Matt House was in over his head as DC, and that’s a big reason why Pitt struggled on defense. Paul Chrysts recruiting is one of the most under appreciated things from Pitt fans in a long time. Chryst also took a gamble in late January on a WR from Wisconsin named Jester Weah who outside of Maurice Ffrench and Quadree Henderson was the most explosive WR Narduzzi has had. Chryst recruited 2 of the 3not to mention guys like Conner, Boyd, hall, ollison, the te’s and oline. The defense wasn’t nearly as devoid of talent as it was made out to be.
It's about time. Some have zero understanding of corporate hierarchies work. No weird corner. Just typical yinzer bull.
not to mention guys like Conner, Boyd, hall, ollison, the te’s and oline. The defense wasn’t nearly as devoid of talent as it was made out to be.
You forgot no QBs, no DL and no LBs.
No one is saying they both don’t have flaws, however narduzzi hasn’t recruited wr’s, te’s, the oline, lb’s all that well, rb’s...so it’s a pick your poison sort of thing.You forgot no QBs, no DL and no LBs.
DB's also....remember starting Terrish Webb, while missing out on stud DB's like Nicholson (oh the irony Narduzzi out recruited Pitt for him)
avontae Maddox, Ryan Lewis, and whitehead have all played long stints in the nfl. His dB recruiting wasn’t nearly as bad as it is made out to be...narduzzi just didn’t know how to use them.
there is some truth to this
This myth that recruiting plummets if Narduzzi doesn’t get an extension is absolutely ridiculous. If Saban or Dabo announce today that this is their last season as HC, I would bet everything I own that their recruiting doesn’t plummet. Kids at Pitt realize they haven’t won a thing except a tie breaker which granted them a pass to get slaughtered by Clemson on National TV. The Narduzzi era has been an underwhelming failure in just about every measure imaginable
These guys!!!It's not hard to figure out where a lot of it is coming from.
You can't be serious. No one? That is ridiculous to think no one had a problem with it. Did people express understanding for how this program needed some stability....yes. Was everyone all in on Duzz to the tune of a 7 year financial commitment that would make it difficult to cut ties if 5-7 was not an anomaly and a blip on the radar? HXLL NO!
I'm a Narduzzi sheep, but I thought 7 years was a bit excessive. Not against an extension, as that is the way the game is played bwtween coach/school/agent. But if he had totally cratered after that... well, it would not have been good to put it mildly.