Nah. UVA had a better conference record, a better overall record and better OOC wins. Not saying UVA deserved a bid. Just saying they were probably more deserving than Pitt. And it wasn't just the selection committee that seem to think that. Almost every bracketologist seemed to have the same read on it.
Virginia & Pitt just weren't very good last year. Both had bubble type resumes. That's a bizzare concept for a 10-loss team to think they are entitled to be in the tourney.
STOP IT
Pitt had
1. A better NET
2. A tougher SOS
3. A road win at UVa
There is not a person alive with any semblance of intelligence who thinks that UVa was more deserving than Pitt. Pitt beats them in every metric that matters and beat them head to head.