It had been rumored that the ACC got rid of this rule, especially since the Belk Bowl badly wanted 6-6 VT in Beamer's last game last year and was furious they couldn't take them because Pitt was still on the table at 8-4 since the Pinstripe took 7-5 Duke over them.
The ACC Championship game fact sheet which you can google is very clear that the league o longer adheres to the "rigidity" of the one win rule. It now only applies to ND.
This is bad news for northern teams with smaller alumni bases like Pitt, Syr, and BC. These teams have fewer fans and require longer travel for those fans to get to bowl games, which are predominantly in the south.
What this means is you better hope UNC comes back and beats NC State today because I'm telling you that at 6-6, they are going to be more attractive to most ACC bowls than 8-4 Pitt. They are going to sell more tickets than Pitt would in places like Charlotte, Jacksonville, Nashville, and El Paso (where neither school would sell many but NCSU probably sells 300-500 more).
The ACC Championship game fact sheet which you can google is very clear that the league o longer adheres to the "rigidity" of the one win rule. It now only applies to ND.
This is bad news for northern teams with smaller alumni bases like Pitt, Syr, and BC. These teams have fewer fans and require longer travel for those fans to get to bowl games, which are predominantly in the south.
What this means is you better hope UNC comes back and beats NC State today because I'm telling you that at 6-6, they are going to be more attractive to most ACC bowls than 8-4 Pitt. They are going to sell more tickets than Pitt would in places like Charlotte, Jacksonville, Nashville, and El Paso (where neither school would sell many but NCSU probably sells 300-500 more).