ADVERTISEMENT

OK, did anyone think Narduzzi was this good?

no, I call you a penn state fan for all your other post. You and TD may be the same person, but certainly the same agenda.

But... to answer your comment... yeah, I think going from a passive defense that couldnt stop a little girl to be a dominent, top 5 defense in the country with hard hits, sacks, turnovers, and all in only 4 games... that is 'this good'. I was basically saying... "yeah, we all knew Narduzzi could coach defense for MSU, but did anyone actually think he would make our defense look this amazing so quickly with the seemingly barren talent that was left him from Chryst"
You and anybody that calls me a Penn State fan is a jerk, look, just because I don't see things like you do doesn't equate in any way to being a "Nitter". In fact it seems like you are the one that wants to keep Pitt at a lower echelon, not me! I want Pitt to have a Calipari or a Saban and be standing at the top of the mountain, holding all the hardware, looking down at everyone else, you just want 9-10 wins and a 6-6 every now and then, while I want to see a 9-3 get the coach fired! So it's me who wants Pitt to be the best, and you must be a "Nitter" coming here with your mediocrity agenda to undermine my Panthers.
 
Agree and very fair statement. All I know is that the Pitt defense played better each week in each game, and that is measurement on All Coaching. If the Team is playing later in the year than earlier it is good sign coaching improves the Team?

I agree Coach Pat & Staff needs far more showing and the entire year to show true sustainable and stable change. Georgia Tech, UNC, Notre Dame, ULou, Miami and Duke will be good measurements against some very good to great coaches and that includes improving the Offense, Defense, and Special teams, having good Game Plans, making good Play Calls, and having the Players Execute and win Games they should win and upset the Teams that might have better Talent.


There are changes at Pitt way better than I saw under Chryst on Defense and Special Teams, but the Offense is not so great right now, the outlook although appears promising, we need to see and believe in it?
Narduzzi "seems" that good. Don't get me wrong, I'm not lying when I say that I have connections inside the athletic committee, and the guys I know absolutely LOVE Narduzzi, and see great potential. They have been his guests at practice and are true believers that this could be the guy, and is the best they've seen in years. just don't crown him prematurely is all I'm saying. You never know, maybe Pitt finally gets lucky and signs the next guy that is an Urban Meyer or a Saban.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Saban and Meyer no doubt. Just my opinion, but I would go ahead and put Harbaugh in the mix. I think any fanbase in college football would trade their Head Coach for one of those 3 guys and call it a big upgrade. I think Stoops would be just behind those three.

And among active coaches, I think Spurrier would have been considered and elite coach once upon a time.
As stated, I did not put down everyone, but Spurrier is an exceptional coach and was Elite at his own Florida. Yet, did not do so well while in the NFL, but that happens to many College Coaches. Spurrier returned to College but not to an Elite Program in South Carolina and is still trying to make them an Elite Program. They are very good, and so is he, but it is tough to win 11-13+ Games in SEC year in and year out. I put Harbaugh in that category too, but he returned to Michigan which i an Elite Programs, but we shall see how he does against Dantonio and Meyers and other Big Ten Competition.

As stated, it goes in cycles and shades of rankings changes too, but Elite Coaches win any where, ad often move to Elite Programs where it gets far tougher and winning 10 games sometimes does not cut it.

Yet, when an Elite coach like Meyers and Saban and Miles go to an Elite Program, they are usually in the Top 10 to Top 15 Hunt almost every year and NCS Playoff consideration,

Briles has beaten Stoops the few years that as well as some other Very Good and Great Coaches not from Elite Programs and other Elite Coaches from Elite Programs have done it too. Stoops was without a doubt Elite after taking over OU in 1999 and maybe will re-establish it this year, but he has been only great the last few years not Elite in spite of having everything at OU!


Briles as rebuilt Baylor into a Top Ten Team lately and still needs to win above 10+ Games every year and be ranked in the Top 10-15 for Ten Years to build Baylor Program and there New Stadium has helped them to do it.

Patterson has taken TCU to new heights and in 3 Conferences but whether Briles and Patterson can stay at the high level they have been doing is the challenge in coming years, just like Stoops now has to deal with them and others to maintain OU's Elite Status in wins that has dipped just a tad these least few years.

So far, Patterson and Briles has not left TCU and Baylor and have been given many offers? Yet, TCU, Bayor and OU are all in the Top 10 right now, and I did pick OU as a possible NCS Playoff contender this year a few weeks back since Stoops seems to have them back. But only 1 is going to that Four Team Playoff since they play each other and like last year not having a Conference Championship could make that a maybe again depending what other Top 5 Teams win by the end of season?
 
Saban and Meyer no doubt. Just my opinion, but I would go ahead and put Harbaugh in the mix. I think any fanbase in college football would trade their Head Coach for one of those 3 guys and call it a big upgrade. I think Stoops would be just behind those three.
And among active coaches, I think Spurrier would have been considered and elite coach once upon a time.
Agree about all four and just an opinion, and there are shades of Elite Status based on how they win each year. All coaches start off somewhere, and then grow into becoming Great Coaches anywhere, and then the Elite Programs come a calling, and then you have that special combination of elite Coaches at Elite Programs.

Still, Meyers wet from Bowling Green to Utah to Florida and OSU! Saban went from Toledo to NFL Browns DC to MSU to LSU to NFL Miami to Bama.

Bear Bryant went from Maryland to Kentucky to A&M with NCAA Sanctions left behind him them to Bama where he built them into an Elite Program! It took Bama a Decade to find and hire Saban!
They always were good coaches but they have to find a place where they thrive to become and stay Elite! Saban has done that and has been mention as Texas ad USC targets too, but so far loves it at Bama. If he drops off and starts to win just 8 games like Stoops did after 2008 he could go down in Elite Status until he gets them back to where he has them the last 7 years?
 
Well, that assessment is completely ridiculous. The post merely says did anyone actually think our defense would have such a turn-around like this so quickly. It certainly is a fair and accurate statement, 4 weeks or not. There is NO question the defense is far more aggressive and that aggressiveness is leading to more sacks, turnover, fewer points given up etc.

I think complaining about the offense is pretty ridiculous as there aren't many teams out there that can lose their best player and not miss a beat. And those that can are championship type teams. Weren't we 6-7 last year???
I mean, I understand the negativity, you're a pittsburgher, but geez this thread couldn't be more simple.
Until Stoops gets OU back to beating TCU and Baylor and winning the Big-12 going 11-1 or 12-0 I find any assessment of Stoops being an Elite Coach right up there with Meyers and Saban and few others completely ridiculous just based on his last 5 or 6 years.

Even before that USC Carroll, KSU Synder, WVU CoachRod/Stewart, as well as Boise, Meyers UF, TCU and Baylor have been able to beat him and puts him just under that Elite Status compared to some others and have no problem with others differing opinions.

Bob Stoops came from the Hayden Frye Iowa Hawkeyes Coaching Staffs like many great Graduate and Assistants get a start of learning under one of the Best. He went from Iowa to Kent State to KSU to Florida moving up to Dc and AHC, until named OU Head Coach!


Stoops took over an Elite Program in 1999 that was mired in winning just 5 to 8 games over multiple years, and went 7-5 his first year. No question he turned them around with Elite Coaching, but he was deny nothing from OU to do it.

After his first year he made OU National Champions going 13-0 but the Miami Canes was kept from OU and Stoops beat FSU 13-2. Most felt Miami would have beaten him? He went 10+ Wins and was back in the NCS Game in 2003 after Snyder's KSU beat him 35-7 in the Big-12 Championship and LSU Miles beat him 14-7 in the NCS. In 2004, he ran the tables again in the Big-12 but Carroll's USC Team wiped him up 55-19. Many felt again OU did not belong in those games from 2000-2003 but Stoops won 1 of them?

In 2005 Stoop's OU dropped to 8-5, returned to 11-3 in 2006 only to lose close games to Oregon, Texas and Boise State, in 2007 Stoops went 11-3 again losing big to WVU 48-28, in 2008 rebounded to 11-2 losing BCS NCS Game to Meyers of Florida 24-14.

In 2009 OU dropped to 8-5, followed by 12-2-2010, 10-3-2011, 10-3-2012, 11-2-2013 beating Saban's Bama, and 8-5-2014. Coaches like TT Leach and KSU Snyder now followed by TCU Patterson and BU Briles, sometimes beat Stoops with less Talent, but Stoops has an Elite Program and many expect more of him, and so does OU Fans. It is just my opinion he is a tad under some other coaches but he can prove otherwise with a great NCS Run in 2015.

Stoops himself has produced a number of Assistants that went on to being Head Coaches as well. I just feel he won that NCS way back in 2000 because he did not play Miami that was excellent from 2000 to 2002!

Right now Stoops looks to be back, but TCU and Baylor have won more with less talent that Stoops has in abundance. Until pays back them by beating them and goes back to winning 12 games I have dipped him a tad in my opinion, and again respect others that may differ.


Stoops certainly put Holgrosen in hi place last week?
 
I have a hard time calling any coach who hasn't won a NC elite. In that sense, Stoops would be elite, but everyone here is right, he has been on the decline for quite some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Teh Teh, VaTech lost their best offensive player. Defensive player too. Just saying.
Beamer was exceptional in 1990s and 2000s especially early winning in the ACC. He has slowed down a tad and I attriibute that to UVA London ad Chip West taking some mighty fine Top 10 to 100 ESPN/RIVALS/SCOUT from VT tehs elast 5 years.

As Paterno once said, most games are won by 4 to 6 plays and by 2 to 3 players in College Football! UVA grabbed a Top 10 DL and DB the last few years enough to hurt Beamer just like Pitt in the early 1970s started to hurt Paterno's Program doing the same.


In any event, Beamer did win 10+ games over Ten Years and built VT into a Top 25 Program, but like Stoops that is now good enough, and thus some calls for their time to go have come up, and again that just may be a cycle of good to great to excellence and some dropping down after many years up.
 
"Pitt79, post: 381278, member: 2170"]I'd rather just WIN BIG, I'd take Calipari and his methods in a heart beat , and celebrate REALLY WINNING every year.
I agree and who doesn't but some Chancellors and Athletic Directors won't accept Pitt Alumnus Capilari as a Head Coach and overlooked Pitt Alumnus Sean Miller too?

Do I care if the Pirates would BUY a World Series championship? Hell no, I'd love it! If the Nutting pockets aren't deep enough, I'd root for someone richer with a giant ego to buy the team, the guy that would try to BUY a championship so he can stand there being presented the trophy! That's better than "developing young guys" and "coming close".
Some College Football Programs have been known to buy their Players and have admitted it after they retired, but Pitt is not one of them and will have to do it like TCU, Baylor, VT, and KSU finding a Coach that can win with less Talent and then win 10+ Games over several years and beat Elite Coaches and Elite Programs to re-build the Pitt Program.

A few great coaches wanted to come to Pitt at one time in Barry Alvarez but he was rejected or overlooked in 1989, Jackie Sherrill wanted to return to Pitt but they took Johnny Majors instead, and since then Pederson and Nordenberg had a bad run in attracting Coaches that might have become Very Good or Great or Elite Coaches!

We have all shared in that pain and I agree with you, but I can give Coach Pat a chance, been doing that for awhile anyway?:confused:
 
I would not care if a pro team buys a championship. In college though, it would be much more satisfying to win a championship with say a Jamie Dixon, a guy with great character.

Just a thought about Narduzzi, as I'm thrilled with the guy. Anyone have any ideas for a Narduzzi chant when the team takes the field Saturday? Just to let him know how happy we are to have him here.
 
"Pitt79, post: 381317, member: 2170"]Narduzzi "seems" that good. Don't get me wrong, I'm not lying when I say that I have connections inside the athletic committee, and the guys I know absolutely LOVE Narduzzi, and see great potential.
I don't doubt you and very much respect your info and opinions and knowledge in your posts.

They have been his guests at practice and are true believers that this could be the guy, and is the best they've seen in years. just don't crown him prematurely is all I'm saying.
Very fair and do not disagree! Yet, I am only judging what I am seeing from game 1 to game 4 and I see a change in attitude, play, and coaching. Whether it continues and grows is still a great unknown until we see the rest of games? Just discussing it as we wait to see?

You never know, maybe Pitt finally gets lucky and signs the next guy that is an Urban Meyer or a Saban.
Yep, and Coach Pat always wanted to come to Pitt! I am told the Players love him just as the MSU's Players did at MSU.
 
I have a hard time calling any coach who hasn't won a NC elite. In that sense, Stoops would be elite, but everyone here is right, he has been on the decline for quite some time.
My point exactly and his record shows it lately, sometimes there are misinterpretations, and no one disrespecting what Stoops has done at OU an Elite Program.

Stoops has the most Wins of all Power Conference Coaches since 1999 and that alone shows he is Great Coach, but he has some losses that took him out of Elite Opinion for the time being too. I expect more from any coaches that run an Elite Program!

My Elite Program Listings:
A combination of Revenues, High Coaching Salaries & Staff, Boosters Contributions, Recruiting Summer Camps Invitations, Coaching Clinics, Big Rosters Beyond 85 Scholarships and 110 Rosters, Fan Attendance and Presidents and Chancellors that will hire and fire Athletic Directors that cannot find Elite Coaches to maintain their Elite Programs. This means after while winning 10+ games is not always good enough but have to win Conference and play in NCS Bowls and Games.



 
Last edited:
"Pitt79, post: 381317, member: 2170"]Narduzzi "seems" that good. Don't get me wrong, I'm not lying when I say that I have connections inside the athletic committee, and the guys I know absolutely LOVE Narduzzi, and see great potential.
I don't doubt you and very much respect your info and opinions and knowledge in your posts.

They have been his guests at practice and are true believers that this could be the guy, and is the best they've seen in years. just don't crown him prematurely is all I'm saying.
Very fair and do not disagree! Yet, I am only judging what I am seeing from game 1 to game 4 and I see a change in attitude, play, and coaching. Whether it continues and grows is still a great unknown until we see the rest of games? Just discussing it as we wait to see?

You never know, maybe Pitt finally gets lucky and signs the next guy that is an Urban Meyer or a Saban.
Yep, and Coach Pat always wanted to come to Pitt! I am told the Players love him just as the MSU's Players did at MSU.
Absolutely, from what I hear, the whole attitude in practice is a cut above anything the last 20 years, and Narduzzi communicates with the athletic committee and the Pitt academic community (professors, departments etc.) like none other, some previous coaches would blow those people off and make enemies of them, Narduzzi is trying to get buy in from what I'm told and getting good reviews.
 
"Pitt79, post: 381902, member: 2170"]Absolutely, from what I hear, the whole attitude in practice is a cut above anything the last 20 years, and Narduzzi communicates with the athletic committee and the Pitt academic community (professors, departments etc.) like none other, some previous coaches would blow those people off and make enemies of them, Narduzzi is trying to get buy in from what I'm told and getting good reviews.
Thanks Pitt79 and glad to hear it!:D

Please Posts more whenever you hear something, great insights and readings.:cool:

:rolleyes:Lets go Pitt!:cool:
 
Stoops won something like 43 or 44 games between 2010 & 2013. Not to mention, his Sooners put an epic beatdown on the Crimson Tide in the Sugar Bowl year before last. Stoops has just raised expectations so high, it has become more difficult for Sooner nation to appreciate the guy.

I don't know about TCU, but trust me, the money is flowing at Baylor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
"TD_6082, post: 382205, member: 510"]Stoops won something like 43 or 44 games between 2010 & 2013. Not to mention, his Sooners put an epic beatdown on the Crimson Tide in the Sugar Bowl year before last. Stoops has just raised expectations so high, it has become more difficult for Sooner nation to appreciate the guy. I don't know about TCU, but trust me, the money is flowing at Baylor.
As stated above Stoops is Second in Wins since becoming his First & Only Head Coach at OU in 1999 and has produced many other coaches from Assistants To Head coaches under him. He is from Youngstown too, just like Narduzzi, Pelini, Tressel, and Stoops Brothers. I have no problem acknowledging his excellence and wish he did come to Pitt in 1999, and he has a great team this year?

For The Record & Link:

I-A Winning Percentage 1999-2014 (16 years)
1 Boise State 0.85096 177 31 0 208
2 Oklahoma 0.79245 168 44 0 212
3 Ohio State 0.78351 152 42 0 194
4 Oregon 0.76098 156 49 0 205
5 Texas Christian 0.75000 150 50 0 200
6 Texas 0.74879 155 52 0 207
7 Louisiana State 0.74396 154 53 0 207
8 Virginia Tech 0.73333 154 56 0 210
9 Georgia 0.73077 152 56 0 208
10 Southern Cal 0.72251 138 53 0 191
LINK:
http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin...=1999&end=2014&rpct=30&min=5&se=on&by=Win+Pct

However, the rise of Briles and Patterson and return of Snyder has complicated his challenge to win the Big-12? But like you and DRVY have said, OU still in the Top Ten!

I-A Winning Percentage 2010-2014 (5 years)
1 Oregon 0.88235 60 8 0 68
2 Alabama 0.86567 58 9 0 67
3 Florida State 0.84058 58 11 0 6

4 Boise State 0.83333 55 11 0 66
5 Northern Illinois 0.81429 57 13 0 70
6 Stanford 0.80597 54 13 0 67

7 Ohio State 0.80000 44 11 0 55
8 Michigan State 0.79104 53 14 0 67
9 Louisiana State 0.78788 52 14 0 66

10 Oklahoma 0.77273 51 15 0 66
LINK:
http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin...=2010&end=2014&rpct=30&min=5&se=on&by=Win+Pct

 
Last edited:
Well, that assessment is completely ridiculous. The post merely says did anyone actually think our defense would have such a turn-around like this so quickly. It certainly is a fair and accurate statement, 4 weeks or not. There is NO question the defense is far more aggressive and that aggressiveness is leading to more sacks, turnover, fewer points given up etc.

I think complaining about the offense is pretty ridiculous as there aren't many teams out there that can lose their best player and not miss a beat. And those that can are championship type teams. Weren't we 6-7 last year???
I mean, I understand the negativity, you're a pittsburgher, but geez this thread couldn't be more simple.

I constantly forget that we live in this Polaroid instant analysis culture where straight up bullshit is accepted as legitimate.

How good is Narduzzi? I think pretty good but who knows?

If the question is are we where I thought we would be when Narduzzi initially took over? My answer is yes, we are almost exactly where I thought we would be at this stage in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
By way of comparison, our defensive numbers were almost identical through four games last year as they are at the same stage this year. That is not negativity, that's reality.

I love the hire and began advocating for his hiring before just about anybody. While many other people were talking about that row-row-row your boat douche bag at Central Michigan or the coaches of Marshall or Memphis, I was on Naeduzzi primarily because I thought he had the best chance to be a good cultural fit here where as those other guys were much more iffy.

However, let's just wait a few games before we start erecting statues. I say that because I like him, not because I dislike him.

We have royally screwed up this program for decades. It is going to take some time to untangle this mess. Let's not freak out and lose our minds as the process - which is sure to be full of both peaks and valleys - unfolds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
"Dr. von Yinzer, post: 383207, member: 3314"]I constantly forget that we live in this Polaroid instant analysis culture where straight up bullshit is accepted as legitimate.
Quite agree, but that changes nothing since all comment anyway and any analysis after just four games is going to be tough to make, but some will do it anyway. I still have no idea what will happen but I saw improvement from a change in Player's Attitudes in every game, and that is not BS?

How good is Narduzzi? I think pretty good but who knows?
I am honest enough to say, I Don't Know, and I never knew before the season either? It is always hard to judge a New Coach on his First Year as Head Coach ANYWHERE!

If the question is are we where I thought we would be when Narduzzi initially took over? My answer is yes, we are almost exactly where I thought we would be at this stage in the game.
Well, not me, I knew most games were going to be Toss Ups or Toss Up Wins, or Toss Up Losses and posted such at the start of this New Year and before the season. Although I like where Pitt & The Coaches & Players are headed, I still see UVA as very close Toss Up Win, right now? I will look more closely the next two days, but UVA has played far tougher schedule, almost beat ND, ad has had 2 Weeks to prepare for a Victor's Pitt Team that played great on Defense but barely got by on Offense, and may be over confident in playing against a Team they think is on the ropes with a Coach on a Hot Seat. This adds up to a a close Upset right now I fear. yet, Pitt is also capable of waking up on Offense and still playing great on Defense and winning big.

I'll decide and call it on Friday but I am not touching any bets on this game????
 
I expect the Pitt to roll on Saturday. Virginia really struggles moving the football. An active, pressure based defense seems like a really bad matchup for them. They have a really good scat back. Otherwise, they don't have a whole helluva lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
By way of comparison, our defensive numbers were almost identical through four games last year as they are at the same stage this year. That is not negativity, that's reality.
Again, no one can disagree with the numbers, but does that include Sacks and Interceptions, I don't know and why I ask, because I don't analyze Numbers?
I analyze how coaches prepare their Teams on their Game Plans, call plays, make Half-Time Adjustments, deal with injuries, and finish 4th quarter games and then see how they improve from the 1st game to finishing the seasons.

I love the hire and began advocating for his hiring before just about anybody. While many other people were talking about that row-row-row your boat douche bag at Central Michigan or the coaches of Marshall or Memphis, I was on Naeduzzi primarily because I thought he had the best chance to be a good cultural fit here where as those other guys were much more iffy.
I changed my mind from Rudolph after other smarter Posters like yourself, HughGreen, NCPanther, UPitt89 and others told me Coach Pat is the best choice. after I saw him come and pick his Staff within weeks unlike Chryst that took months, I liked him even more. How he changed Attitudes during Spring Ball, Summer Camp, and got to know his Players and said no one will know more about his Panthers than him and keeping much from the media, just turned me on in every aspect. Yet, I am still in the dark on predicting the rest of the season although very optimistic. Especially after seeing all 4 Games!

However, let's just wait a few games before we start erecting statues. I say that because I like him, not because I dislike him.
This is logical, reasonable and wise especially in the fAce of key injuries, New OC and Ne QB? I did predict that Pitt lacked Depth and could not afford key injuries to have a successful season. I can still see 7 to 8 Wins in all those Toss Up Games, but won't know for sure until I see UVA and GT games?

We have royally screwed up this program for decades. It is going to take some time to untangle this mess. Let's not freak out and lose our minds as the process - which is sure to be full of both peaks and valleys - unfolds.
It began by Chancellor Gallagher bringing back the Pitt Script, dumping Pederson, and seeking a better vision for Pitt football with Narduzzi and Barnes that both want to be at Pitt, more than to exploit it for teir egos and pockets.

Unlike Pederson Poison whereby Nordenberg preferred pumping millions into Pederson Pockets and losing it from Pitt Contributors and Boosters that stayed away from Pitt, and could not admit he made mistakes.

Gallagher, Narduzzi and Barnes want to be at Pitt, welcome to hear from Alumni, Boosters and Fans, not afraid to admit and correct mistakes, and the Players, Fans, and soon more recruits are seeing it happen at Pitt. Rather than keeping Pederson that no other Program wants in anyway at two failure at Nebraska and Pitt in his second tenure and left Pitt in its darkest time.


Pitt will get back on track and based on coach Pat & Staff Coaching will determine how long or if other changes are needed?

All I know is I have not been as excited about with all these changes in one year, Pitt since 1972?
 
"Dr. von Yinzer, post: 383487, member: 3314"]I expect the Pitt to roll on Saturday. Virginia really struggles moving the football. An active, pressure based defense seems like a really bad matchup for them. They have a really good scat back. Otherwise, they don't have a whole helluva lot.
If true and you are correct and I have not ruled that out either, then we should win Cuse & ULou too! Giving Pitt 6 Wins!

After that if Pitt Defense continues to be as good as you predict in this game and the Offense wakes up, add Wins against Duke, going to 7 games!

If Pitt beats Georgia Tech next, add in wins against them and Miami, going to 9 games!

Leaving unknowns against a better than expected UNC team and tough ND Team & Coach and I would split those Wins giving Pitt a 10 Win Season!

Barring any injuries to Boyd of course! Just a Hunch right now! beating UVa and GT will just show more reality into Pitt Improvements and no more portending since the Players are buying into what the Coaches are teaching, and a New Head coach is pretty good taking on some very good Head Coaches experience and stable staffs at other ACC Programs?


In turn, Recruiting Heads will turn towards Pitt!
 
One game at a time, captain. One game at a time.
Agree, but more like one Play at a Time, and after every game, one can make a better judgment for the next one, and I am not there yet, due to all the unknowns, until they become more known?

The season can go south fast with key injuries, poor decisions, and just bad luck. Yet, if UVA is a big win that "Boyds" for portending better days ahead with more Tight Ends. Ditto with GT?

But I LIKES what I see from Narduzzi Right now!
 
Me too... I think if the at the start of the season someone told us James Conner would miss the entire year, you would have to think we win 4 or 5 games this year.
 
By way of comparison, our defensive numbers were almost identical through four games last year as they are at the same stage this year. That is not negativity, that's reality.

I love the hire and began advocating for his hiring before just about anybody. While many other people were talking about that row-row-row your boat douche bag at Central Michigan or the coaches of Marshall or Memphis, I was on Naeduzzi primarily because I thought he had the best chance to be a good cultural fit here where as those other guys were much more iffy.

However, let's just wait a few games before we start erecting statues. I say that because I like him, not because I dislike him.

We have royally screwed up this program for decades. It is going to take some time to untangle this mess. Let's not freak out and lose our minds as the process - which is sure to be full of both peaks and valleys - unfolds.
The douchebag you speak of is at Western Michigan, not Central. For a couple of us, there's a big distinction. And I agree, he;s a douchebag.
I expect the Pitt to roll on Saturday. Virginia really struggles moving the football. An active, pressure based defense seems like a really bad matchup for them. They have a really good scat back. Otherwise, they don't have a whole helluva lot.
I don't expect us to "roll" anybody, until proven otherwise. Our offense struggles--currently 115th out of 127 D1 schools. Can't blame that all on bad weather, the same that every school east of the Mississippi has been playing on those same weekends. And we haven;t exactly been up against a murderer's row of defensive juggernauts. That said, we should win the game.
 
Yeah, I want to believe we will destroy Virginia. I could even believe the defense is good enough to keep their offense out of the end zone on Saturday. But that's not to say our offense won't do something to give them a touchdown (e.g. pick six, fumble returned for TD, INT returned for TD).

As fans, we want to believe in our teams offense the way we are starting to believe in our defense. Unfortunately, the offense simply hasn't been consistently good. Saying the weather is the reason they are struggling somehow doesn't feel like we are being completely honest. The offense only scored 17 Points against Iowa (special teams scored 1 TD) and the weather was fine. The defense gave the ball back to the offense how many times at the end of the VT game and the offense just couldn't do anything on their part to put the game away.

The offense simply needs to prove they can string together more than a few good series in a game. Chaney needs to find a way to get his offense to be more productive and he needs to help with more effective play calling (11 designed runs for Peterman in VT game was hardly productive or effective). We have enough solid pieces on offense (even without Conner) for them to be able to score 28 points a game. It would be really encouraging if this is the game the offense proves they can play well for 4 quarters.
 
Last edited:
The offense only scored 17 Points against Iowa (special teams scored 1 TD) and the weather was fine.
I agree that our offense has not been all that good so far. However 17 points against Iowa is not a bad day. They just completely shut down Wisconsin last week. I was more concerned in that game that we turned the ball over in the red zone. If we don't turn the ball over, our offense should be able to start to turn the corner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Look our offense has no firepower... Without Conner its Boyd and that's all... If teams double him 17-24 points is what's going to happen

We probably aren't going to "blow out" anyone
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Good call... we got up early on the hoos then just couldnt put on the accelerator, because there is none. Freshmen running the ball, too many fumbles, too many dropped passes, and the line play has been mediocre on pass protection. But, we now suddenly have the defense that can put teams away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
If any Pitt receiver other than Weah was on the other end of Peterman's pass thrown in the end zone, if Ollison just worried about securing the ball instead of trying to get across the goal line, if Rowell just focused a little more when snapping the ball, if Peterman just decided to throw the ball away or even take a sack as opposed to pump faking a ball with a defender in his face, this game could have been 38 - 10 or even more lopsided.

It's not that we don't have enough firepower on offense... It's that mistakes continue to happen and at times (e.g. last two series of past two games) overly conservative play calling occurs.

This team has enough between Peterman and Boyd and Ollison and James and Holtz and Orndoff and Ford and Q Henderson (if they used him) and a solid Oline and solid fullbacks (and even Voytik) to put up lots of points every game. They just need to do a better job of focusing and making smarter decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
I saw a great Offense in the First Quarter and that is progress as far as I am concern. I did see many mistakes but the Offense has improved in each game and UVA is not as bad as many think?

The Defense gave big plays still, but did not give up, and closed out the game. This is still an improvement. The Offense gave UVA 7 points and Pitt dropped and Fumbled 2 TDS.

The Special Teams blocked another Kick and haven't seen that in awhile and has done it twice this year?

Sure is this Team Great, not playing on that level yet, and still lacks depth, prone to injuries setbacks, and QB still learning but gave a great First Quarter to grab the lead.

Georgia Tech is the real Test how good or average this Coaching Staff is going to be and Team too! GT is having a tough year but they still bring Dave Johnson Coaching and Running Game and it is Away? This is a challenge to the Coaching Staff & Players Improvements on Execution of a Game Plan that beats Dave Johnson.


The Big Games left are still ND, UNC, DUKE, ULOU & Miami! Chaney & Peterman need to have the Offense humming all 4 Quarters, today we got 1 or 2!

The Defense will be tested next week, and Offense needs more time to improve before the Big Games arrive, but this was one step Pitt did lose it, but could have won it far bigger. One play and game at a time is what continues to be executed!
 
Q. Henderson is said to be dealing with 'family issues' and is not available at the time. This is the reason he has not played since the first game.

I hope he rejoins the team, because he certainly had some playing time locked up early.
 
Q. Henderson is said to be dealing with 'family issues' and is not available at the time. This is the reason he has not played since the first game.

I hope he rejoins the team, because he certainly had some playing time locked up early.

Bummer. That's too bad. I hope everything turns out okay for him and his family.

I was wondering why such a talented kid didn't seeing any playing time yesterday.

Thanks for the update.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I want to believe we will destroy Virginia. I could even believe the defense is good enough to keep their offense out of the end zone on Saturday. But that's not to say our offense won't do something to give them a touchdown (e.g. pick six, fumble returned for TD, INT returned for TD).

As fans, we want to believe in our teams offense the way we are starting to believe in our defense. Unfortunately, the offense simply hasn't been consistently good. Saying the weather is the reason they are struggling somehow doesn't feel like we are being completely honest. The offense only scored 17 Points against Iowa (special teams scored 1 TD) and the weather was fine. The defense gave the ball back to the offense how many times at the end of the VT game and the offense just couldn't do anything on their part to put the game away.

The offense simply needs to prove they can string together more than a few good series in a game. Chaney needs to find a way to get his offense to be more productive and he needs to help with more effective play calling (11 designed runs for Peterman in VT game was hardly productive or effective). We have enough solid pieces on offense (even without Conner) for them to be able to score 28 points a game. It would be really encouraging if this is the game the offense proves they can play well for 4 quarters.


Wow, Hugh green you were spot on this post. Offense gave up a pick six and we held on still.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT