It is not running Fleury out of town, it is business. I thought about this the last month.
1) The emergence of Murray as a potential franchise goalie +
2) MAF's age and cap hit +
3) The looming expansion draft in the summer of 2017 where you can only protect one goalie
Equals that it makes sense (makes it likely) that MAF will be traded. Almost has to. If Murray is exposed in the expansion draft he is gone. MAF has some no trade movement. So, the prudent move is to move him, even this offseason, get a nice prospect and/or draft pick and look ahead.
Win or Lose this series, it is amazing the outlook surrounding this team moving forward. Last year at this time, they looked like a bloated, top heavy franchise, devoid of young talent and prospects with a window quickly closing.
Now? With a coach harnessing and utilizing their talents, Crosby and Letang have been reborn. Geno is literally expendable. Kessel, who looked like a bad trade is locked up for 4 more years. Hagelin is on board for 3 more years I think. Hornquist 1. Kunitz ONLY has 1 more year. And kids like Kuhnackl, Sheary, Rust, Sundquist, Wilson, Murrayall have show to be legit, even quality NHL players. All of a sudden, this window is no longer closing. As hard as I have been on Rutherford, with the coaching change, the emergence of young guys (this doesn't even include a guy like Sprong) that the death of the Penguins have been greatly exaggerated. And now with the youth, which are much cheaper options, they can create some cap space also if they so choose. They have some assets that can be move to continue to get younger, deeper, bigger and faster. And a coach who knows what to do with them.
No, I get where you're coming from and ultimately we will probably end up in the same spot. I agree that Matt Murray will likely be the long-term goaltender for Pittsburgh. However, I think you're rushing things a bit here. Let me put it this way, I definitely don't think we've seen the last of Marc Andre Fleury in a Pittsburgh Penguins uniform.
I don't think the expansion draft is going to have much, if anything, to do with the Pens' goaltending plans. I don't think that affects our timeline at all - at least it shouldn't.
Also, there is no chance they would expose Murray, that's what I'm trying to tell you. There is just no way in this world they would risk getting nothing in return for that level of asset.
The same is true of Tampa and it's two talented young goaltenders and Anaheim with it's too talented young netminders.
Some goaltenders are likely to be moved or those teams are going to surrender other assets to Las Vegas in exchange for Las Vegas promising to not draft their prized understudies.
How do I know this? Because I've seen this film before and that's exactly what teams did then and will almost certainly do this time around too.
Some smart general manager for Las Vegas – perhaps Don Maloney – will quickly realize that the extra prospects/draft choices are more valuable to his talent-starved infantile franchise than securing a good goaltender. Now, if your team is ready to win, give me the goaltender. However, it will be a long time before Las Vegas is winning anything - especially in the mighty West.
LV's GM will decide that his team can get by for a few years with a mediocre goaltender if it can accrue a lot of draft choices and prospects to build up the overall depth in his organization.
Las Vegas' first goaltender is going to be someone like Antti Niemi or James Reimer or someone like that. It is not going to be a star caliber player like MAF. We would just get way more for him on the open market. Almost every team could use a world-class goaltender and Fleury is definitely that.
Also, unlike most other positions, goaltenders tend to get better with age, so I don't believe that a 32-year-old MAF is going to scare off anyone; especially given his well-known fitness regimen and athleticism.