ADVERTISEMENT

Ped State-Oklahoma

It's totally impossible to predict how the future will play out. Going by this year alone, Franklin has done a better job. I don't think that is really open for debate. PSU is going into their last game ranked in the Top 10 & still has a chance to win their conference. We have 4 losses and one of them was an ugly loss to a team that was on a 4 game losing streak.

Overall, I think Franklin and Narduzzi have both done a great job at putting their respective schools back on the map.

I don't necessarily agree with you about PSU &WVU having significant advantages over Pitt due to resources. IMO, Holgerson has the toughest job of the three, because of their location and conference. They are a fish out of water and really don't have a recruiting base. PSU has the disadvantage of playing in the same division with tOSU & Michigan and what will traditionally be one of the toughest divisions in college football. PSU is a weird place, and its also impossible to know if Franklin has had full support since he's been there and accepted by those who won't let the Paterno era go.
 
"TD_6082, post: 1674163, member: 510"]It's totally impossible to predict how the future will play out.
Difficult but not IMPOSSIBLE? Bookies do it every week, day, and Vegas hedges bets too all year long, CU winning the PAC-12 was 100 to Win shot? Strong is gone from Texas! The reason why newspapers put Odds in Papers even when Gaming was illegal is because they made money doing it?

We are talking Coaches & Programs here.....one can see a few years ago, Purdue's Hazell was not going to make it? Coaches show how they coach from day one and and by year 3 some can see them improve or eventually go?


Going by this year alone, Franklin has done a better job.
I will wait until the season to play out to agree or disagree? Unlike you that just said, it is IMPOSSIBLE to predict the future? and now contradicts himself before the season is at an end what if Franklin loses his next two game and ends up 9-4? Just saying you said one thing above and just said the opposite just now?

I don't think that is really open for debate.
Then why are you debating it, again a third contradiction from you?

PSU is going into their last game ranked in the Top 10 & still has a chance to win their conference. We have 4 losses and one of them was an ugly loss to a team that was on a 4 game losing streak.
The Penn State has an ugly Loss to Pitt by your 4th contradictions? season not over, do you really want to say this there is a chance PSU could be 9-4 too??

Overall, I think Franklin and Narduzzi have both done a great job at putting their respective schools back on the map.
I agree with you, but I just disagree and I admit I may be wrong, Narduzzi in just his 2nd Year will continue to do it better and with less Pitt Program Resources versus Franklin has had to do with more Program Resource sand 6th years of Head Coaching experiences. Franklin had a two year jump on Narduzzi at PSU too?

I don't necessarily agree with you about PSU &WVU having significant advantages over Pitt due to resources.
Well, have to seen the Games attended this year and Attendance numbers the last 10 years do they make more money, sell more properties rights, have had their Recruiting Staffs in place with no vacancies? Who has the bigger Fan Base? Who has the Bigger Undergraduate Numbers? Have you compared Athletic Department Revenues with WVU, Pitt and PSU?

IMO, Holgerson has the toughest job of the three, because of their location and conference.
I agree with that and he has had 6 years to make them better but DH inherited a pretty good Program created bu CoachRod & kept up by Oliver Luck! yet, Urban Programs like Pitt all have a tough time on attednance as well???

I also might add Holgrosen has had tougher round Robin Schedule playing all 9 Big-12 teams, but this year, has the weaker Schedule than Pitt or PSU, so far?


They are a fish out of water and really don't have a recruiting base.
How many 4 & 5 Star Recruits are on WVU, Pitt, and PSU Rosters? How big are the full Rosters including Walk-Ons! Big Ten allows Unlimited Non-Qualifiers, Big-12 and ACC limits them! If you don't know any of this what are you comparing? Go compare Pitt, PSU, and WVU Recruiting Rankings and list the last 5 years Rankings & 4 & 5 star Recruits? It will be a good learning experience for to compare all 3 of them so you can back up your opinions?

PSU has the disadvantage of playing in the same division with tOSU & Michigan and what will traditionally be one of the toughest divisions in college football.
I have stated this all along and why I feel Franklin is not up to being better due to the Coaches in the Big Ten East and same for Holgrosen in the Big-12, now you are repeating my arguments and concurring but contradict your self for now what 6th time?? I stated many time Narduzzi has easier path in ACC Coastal! I also just see he is the better coach in his 2nd year too, even though Pitt has only been in the ACC since 2013? Plus Narduzzi beat Franklin and was not blown away by a Gundy OKSU Team?

PSU is a weird place, and its also impossible to know if Franklin has had full support since he's been there and accepted by those who won't let the Paterno era go.
Again, you are repeating of what i have stated many times and you can recheck them in my post that are in archives? Yet, you keep saying and it is in the Archives that Franklin needs 2018 to prove he can win but now in 2016 you think he is better in spite of losing to Narduzzi? I understand your opinions since 3 years ago, and we can wait to see the full 2016 results, but I look at all 4 Quarters in a Game, and how much Program Resources are provided by Alumni, Fans, and Income? We agree to disagree and then agree on some other things!

Do you think Franklin is better that Paterno?
Do we Judge Narduzzi in his 6th year too?
You actually agreed to many things I posted!
I see Coach Pat being better right now doing more with less than Franklin has and Holgrosen has had over 6 years, and it is OK if you disagree, we shall see?

TD, I enjoy your comments and this is like a mystery game to be played out in seeing for the future which Coach will be bette.r....Pitt's Coach Pat, Penn States Coach James, or WVU's Coach Dana? Or like you say all 3 the next few years? I don't care if I am wrong just want to see if my hunch is more right as I think?
 
Last edited:
It's totally impossible to predict how the future will play out. Going by this year alone, Franklin has done a better job. I don't think that is really open for debate. PSU is going into their last game ranked in the Top 10 & still has a chance to win their conference. We have 4 losses and one of them was an ugly loss to a team that was on a 4 game losing streak. has franklin done a better job? PN beat franklin head to head with similar talent. If PSU beats MSU and wins the championship game I would say yes but there is also a good chance they have 4 losses and Pitt has 4 losses.

Overall, I think Franklin and Narduzzi have both done a great job at putting their respective schools back on the map.agree

I don't necessarily agree with you about PSU &WVU having significant advantages over Pitt due to resources. IMO, Holgerson has the toughest job of the three, because of their location and conference. agree WVU is the hardest of the three places to win big. They have no local talent base and they are a outsider in their conference. They have to go pretty far to recruit. Pitt and PSu can get %90 of their players from within a 100 mile radius and be pretty good. Disagree that PSU doesn't have a significant advantae in resources. Wvu and Pitt are probably about equal or will be once ACC network gets going. Also WVU will have to deal with the potential b12 breakup/ at least questions once they get close to the end of their GOR.
They are a fish out of water and really don't have a recruiting base. PSU has the disadvantage of playing in the same division with tOSU & Michigan and what will traditionally be one of the toughest divisions in college football. PSU is a weird place, and its also impossible to know if Franklin has had full support since he's been there and accepted by those who won't let the Paterno era go.
agree one thing that hurts PSU is they have a budget/name that puts them near the top 10 but they are in a division with two teams that have more than them. think its tough going forward for them to go more than 2 and 3 against each in the next five years.
 
But again, its impossible to predict the future. Who thought Notre Dame or Michigan State would struggle so bad this year or that Oregon would fall off the face of the earth?

I'm not saying Franklin is or isn't a better coach than Narduzzi. You could make a case for either one. I think its obvious Franklin has had a better 2016 than Narduzzi. There is no question about that.
 
Beating no one good on the road, playing the bottom of the big 10 and losing head to head is not better than what Duzz has done this year.

But again, its impossible to predict the future. Who thought Notre Dame or Michigan State would struggle so bad this year or that Oregon would fall off the face of the earth?

I'm not saying Franklin is or isn't a better coach than Narduzzi. You could make a case for either one. I think its obvious Franklin has had a better 2016 than Narduzzi. There is no question about that.
 
Beating no one good on the road, playing the bottom of the big 10 and losing head to head is not better than what Duzz has done this year.

Ranked #8 is better than unranked. Having a chance to win the conference in late November is better than playing out the string for a minor bowl game.

Duzz lost to VaTech, UNC (neither are world beaters) and was embarrassed by a mediocre Miami team that came into the game on a 4 game losing streak.

Overall, they have had a better year. It's okay to say it. It doesn't change the fact that we beat them 42-39.
 
Ranked #8 is better than unranked. Having a chance to win the conference in late November is better than playing out the string for a minor bowl game.

Duzz lost to VaTech, UNC (neither are world beaters) and was embarrassed by a mediocre Miami team that came into the game on a 4 game losing streak.

Overall, they have had a better year. It's okay to say it. It doesn't change the fact that we beat them 42-39.

They have a better record because they played an easier schedule. PSU would have lost to 2 of the 3 (VaTech, UNC, Miami), and also Ok State. Rutgers, Purdue, Maryland, are an absolute joke.

Your love of all things Penn State/Franklin is beyond bizarre for an alleged Pitt fan.
 
Being ranked higher is not necessarily a function of having a better year. They beat O$U under some weird circumstances and at home. They have NO good road win and yes, they lost head to head. PITT would blow them out if they played right now!

Ranked #8 is better than unranked. Having a chance to win the conference in late November is better than playing out the string for a minor bowl game.

Duzz lost to VaTech, UNC (neither are world beaters) and was embarrassed by a mediocre Miami team that came into the game on a 4 game losing streak.

Overall, they have had a better year. It's okay to say it. It doesn't change the fact that we beat them 42-39.
 
They have a better record because they played an easier schedule. PSU would have lost to 2 of the 3 (VaTech, UNC, Miami), and also Ok State. Rutgers, Purdue, Maryland, are an absolute joke.

Your love of all things Penn State/Franklin is beyond bizarre for an alleged Pitt fan.

I don't see how you can say that. I don't see anything impressive about VaTech, UNC, OKState or Miami that makes me think they would beat PSU. Sure, they could. I don't think any of the above would be favored over PSU.
 
Being ranked higher is not necessarily a function of having a better year. They beat O$U under some weird circumstances and at home. They have NO good road win and yes, they lost head to head. PITT would blow them out if they played right now!

Whatever. I think most people would rather be in their shoes right now than ours. Ya know...still with a shot at a conference championship and the playoffs... but maybe thats just me.
 
I don't see how you can say that. I don't see anything impressive about VaTech, UNC, OKState or Miami that makes me think they would beat PSU. Sure, they could. I don't think any of the above would be favored over PSU.

aside from OSU, please point to one impressive victory by your beloved lions.
 
They aren't my Lions, but other than the 42-39 loss to Pitt the second game of the season and Michigan, they have won the rest of their games. Most of them fairly easily.

Where are the impressive victories by VaTech, UNC or Miami?

you didn't answer my question
 
But again, its impossible to predict the future. Who thought Notre Dame or Michigan State would struggle so bad this year or that Oregon would fall off the face of the earth?

I'm not saying Franklin is or isn't a better coach than Narduzzi. You could make a case for either one. I think its obvious Franklin has had a better 2016 than Narduzzi. There is no question about that.
Every day all Coaches Evaluations are weighed by the Media, Boosters, Game Week, Game Day, Recruiting and by his Competitors and Himself?

1. The season is not over and you already concluded and weighed Franklin is the better Coaches due to 2 wins more even while losing to PN? But you say it is IMPOSSIBLE!

2. You are also on the record here with many Posts of your Post that you say you cannot Judge Franklin until 2018? Now you say it is IMPOSSIBLE?

3. Yet, you just judged PN losing 2 more games below Franklin now before the season is over, If you think it is IMPOSSIBLE the why did you do it?

4. I think is quite fair when you point out PN lost 4 Games, and respect your position, but it is just as fair for other Posters to point whom played you and when, and if you are correct the Villanova Coach is better than JF and PN or Western Michigan because all you do is count Wins.

All I am saying this CFB RIVAL BOARD and discussions on CFB on many subjects happen every day, if you think it is IMPOSSIBLE then your should ignore such Posts and retract your prior Posts that Franklin can't be judged until 2018?

I am predicting PN at Pitt is better than JF at PSU or Holgrosen at WVU and over time and with current analysis is something that can be look backwards, currently and to help predict their futures at all 3 schools, since you say it is impossible then ignore these posts and you have a myopic view anyway since all you look at is Wins?

By your logic Western Michigan has a better Coach than PSU, WVU and PITT? I DISAGREE, come back in end of 2018 and tell us if you were correct?
 
Maybe some of you haven't noticed, particularly our resident wolf in sheep's clothing, but since the Miami loss, our secondary scheme not longer presents easy jump ball opportunities for the offense. This team as presently constituted with the defensive adjustments,, would have beaten, NC, VT, and OK St. Those losses are set in concrete, no ifs here. But we are a far better team now than when we played State Penn and looking at that great 9 - 0 Rutgers triumph, I can't say the same for the Enablers.
 
Last edited:
Maybe some of you haven't noticed, particularly our resident wolf in sheep's clothing, but since the Miami loss, our secondary scheme not longer presents easy jump ball opportunities for the offense. This team as presently constituted with the defensive adjustments,, would have beaten, NC, VT, and OK St. Those losses are set in concrete, no ifs here. But we are a far better team now than when we played State Penn and looking at that great 9 - 0 Rutgers triumph, I can't say the same for the Inablers.

Uh, Clemson set an ACC record for passing yardage against us.

What 9-0 Rutgers triumph?
 
Sorry, left out the 3, Don't mind your obsessive need for attention by being endlessly adversarial, but please stop with the "we" and "our".when referring to Pitt.
 
A typical Big Ten non conference schedule, such as this year

Minnesota

Oregon State
Indiana State
Colorado State

Iowa

Miami Ohio
North Dakota
Iowa State

Maryland


Howard
Florida International
Central Florida

Northwestern


Illinois State
Duke
Western Michigan

-And people wonder why Pitt fans laugh at this conference.
 
Every day all Coaches Evaluations are weighed by the Media, Boosters, Game Week, Game Day, Recruiting and by his Competitors and Himself?

1. The season is not over and you already concluded and weighed Franklin is the better Coaches due to 2 wins more even while losing to PN? But you say it is IMPOSSIBLE!

2. You are also on the record here with many Posts of your Post that you say you cannot Judge Franklin until 2018? Now you say it is IMPOSSIBLE?

3. Yet, you just judged PN losing 2 more games below Franklin now before the season is over, If you think it is IMPOSSIBLE the why did you do it?

4. I think is quite fair when you point out PN lost 4 Games, and respect your position, but it is just as fair for other Posters to point whom played you and when, and if you are correct the Villanova Coach is better than JF and PN or Western Michigan because all you do is count Wins.

All I am saying this CFB RIVAL BOARD and discussions on CFB on many subjects happen every day, if you think it is IMPOSSIBLE then your should ignore such Posts and retract your prior Posts that Franklin can't be judged until 2018?

I am predicting PN at Pitt is better than JF at PSU or Holgrosen at WVU and over time and with current analysis is something that can be look backwards, currently and to help predict their futures at all 3 schools, since you say it is impossible then ignore these posts and you have a myopic view anyway since all you look at is Wins?

By your logic Western Michigan has a better Coach than PSU, WVU and PITT? I DISAGREE, come back in end of 2018 and tell us if you were correct?

I'm just saying that Duzzi & Franklin are both doing a good job & I think the future is bright at both schools. I have enough faith in both coaches to say I think they will win a lot of games and keep reasonable (key word) fans happy. At the same time, its impossible to say how the future will play out. A coach can have a long successful tenure at a school and still get fired. I wouldn't even want to bet that Narduzzi or Franklin will still be at their current jobs 2 or 3 years down the road.

As for 2016 alone, I think Franklin has done a better job. I don't think there is any question about it. Now, if MSU beats the Nits on Saturday, you could flip a coin and make an argument for either one. We needed to beat UNC and VaTech. Narduzzi said himself that VaTech was the biggest game of the year.

I'm not going to get Holgy in this. It just complicates things further and I think that WVU as a program is on shakier ground than Pitt or PSU right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
I'm just saying that Duzzi & Franklin are both doing a good job & I think the future is bright at both schools. I have enough faith in both coaches to say I think they will win a lot of games and keep reasonable (key word) fans happy. At the same time, its impossible to say how the future will play out. A coach can have a long successful tenure at a school and still get fired. I wouldn't even want to bet that Narduzzi or Franklin will still be at their current jobs 2 or 3 years down the road.

As for 2016 alone, I think Franklin has done a better job. I don't think there is any question about it. Now, if MSU beats the Nits on Saturday, you could flip a coin and make an argument for either one. We needed to beat UNC and VaTech. Narduzzi said himself that VaTech was the biggest game of the year.

I'm not going to get Holgy in this. It just complicates things further and I think that WVU as a program is on shakier ground than Pitt or PSU right now.

-I think the Big Ten likes to beat up on garbage teams. Those non conference schedules are a disgrace to football.
 
I don't know. Rutgers played Washington. PSU played us. Nebraska played Oregon. tOSU played Oklahoma. Michigan played Colorado. Wisconsin played LSU.

-Your middle of the pack Big Ten teams are going to get clowned in the bowls.
 
I'm just saying that Duzzi & Franklin are both doing a good job & I think the future is bright at both schools. I have enough faith in both coaches to say I think they will win a lot of games and keep reasonable (key word) fans happy. At the same time, its impossible to say how the future will play out. A coach can have a long successful tenure at a school and still get fired. I wouldn't even want to bet that Narduzzi or Franklin will still be at their current jobs 2 or 3 years down the road.

As for 2016 alone, I think Franklin has done a better job. I don't think there is any question about it. Now, if MSU beats the Nits on Saturday, you could flip a coin and make an argument for either one. We needed to beat UNC and VaTech. Narduzzi said himself that VaTech was the biggest game of the year.

I'm not going to get Holgy in this. It just complicates things further and I think that WVU as a program is on shakier ground than Pitt or PSU right now.
We agree more than disagree on many things, I agree Frankin has 2 more wins than Narduzzi, nothing wrong with it, it was was new offense too, and PSu defense looks much better as well.

But you have to admit, Pitt did not struggle against Rutgers 2-9, and Indiana, the last two game nor Minnesota earlier in the season. One can see Franklin's Coaching lacked winning from start to finish. He came back in second half and I can credit that too, but how did he get behind? Narduzzi teams played with their Teams all game long that is what I am seeing as the difference!

Even in Miami, Pitt was in that game until Pitt committed Turnovers, they failed in the second half. Most of Pitt Games have been playing well all 4 Quarters and coming up short in 3 of them.

I can wait to see the year play out and then compare Signature Wins and losses with 2 coaches. I just see Narduzzi the better coach and will prove it over time.
 
Uh, Clemson set an ACC record for passing yardage against us.

What 9-0 Rutgers triumph?
As the saying goes, STATS are for losers. The scoreboard counts and WE WON the game. I don't care if we give up 1,000 yards as long as WE WIN.
 
Pitt is better than Penn State. Narduzzi is a better coach than Franklin. Pitt won head to head, has the better win beating Clemson on the road, and has played much better teams. Any other conclusion is not reasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainSidneyReilly
Pitt is better than Penn State. Narduzzi is a better coach than Franklin. Pitt won head to head, has the better win beating Clemson on the road, and has played much better teams. Any other conclusion is not reasonable.

I don't think the CFP committee sees things from that point of view.
 
Agree. But he is saying defensive adjustments won the games played since the Miami loss. Pitt won in spite of the defense at Clemson.
Yeah, that says even more, than PSU struggles against weaklings and OSU Blocked Kick Win you keep hanging your Head on, and not recognizing PSU Wins are just 2 Quarter Wins in Games, versus Pitt 4 Quarter Play all year long even with a growing Young Defense!

Yet, it is IMPOSSIBLE to see the future today, but you know how the CFB Committee is doing just that on how you see them see it?

Did you ever think you can judge Yesterday either or is that IMPOSSIBLE too? You can't see the difference in competition, nor steady play in Pitt, but Penn State 9 Wins are far superior in your mind somehow???

So, we shall see how PSU plays MSU & B1G West Winner, and Bowl Games? Cuse has more wins than MSU and against VT!
 
Last edited:
Pitt is better than Penn State. Narduzzi is a better coach than Franklin. Pitt won head to head, has the better win beating Clemson on the road, and has played much better teams. Any other conclusion is not reasonable.


I know what you are saying, you just have to clue the voters in. Show them the errors of their ways!
 
One thing you fail to mention is that Franklin has had more years as a head coach, not only at Penn State, but at Vanderbilt too. There is a HUGE difference between being a coordinator and a head coach. I would say that Narduzzi is way ahead of Franklin in that respect. Pitt was 6-6 that last three years prior to Narduzzi coming here and the fact he could improve to 8-4 in his first year with basically the same schedule is in my opinion quite amazing for a first year as a head coach. Contrary to what most think on here I believe that being 8-4, providing they beat Syracuse, this year with a much tougher schedule than last year is quite telling of how good he is and can be. We have seen him make mistakes these first two years, but hopefully he learns from them.

It's totally impossible to predict how the future will play out. Going by this year alone, Franklin has done a better job. I don't think that is really open for debate. PSU is going into their last game ranked in the Top 10 & still has a chance to win their conference. We have 4 losses and one of them was an ugly loss to a team that was on a 4 game losing streak.

Overall, I think Franklin and Narduzzi have both done a great job at putting their respective schools back on the map.

I don't necessarily agree with you about PSU &WVU having significant advantages over Pitt due to resources. IMO, Holgerson has the toughest job of the three, because of their location and conference. They are a fish out of water and really don't have a recruiting base. PSU has the disadvantage of playing in the same division with tOSU & Michigan and what will traditionally be one of the toughest divisions in college football. PSU is a weird place, and its also impossible to know if Franklin has had full support since he's been there and accepted by those who won't let the Paterno era go.
 
Until college football is decided on the field and not by committees and polls, the BIG and SEC will ALWAYS have an advantage. Letting people decide championships instead of coaches and players is just stupid! Might as well be gymnastics.

That's because I don't have the same pro Big Ten agenda
 
Yeah, that says even more, than PSU struggles against weaklings and OSU Blocked Kick Win you keep hanging your Head on, and not recognizing PSU Wins are just 2 Quarter Wins in Games, versus Pitt 4 Quarter Play all year long even with a growing Young Defense!

Yet, it is IMPOSSIBLE to see the future today, but you know how the CFB Committee is doing just that on how you see them see it?

Did you ever think you can judge Yesterday either or is that IMPOSSIBLE too? You can't see the difference in competition, nor steady play in Pitt, but Penn State 9 Wins are far superior in your mind somehow???

So, we shall see how PSU plays MSU & B1G West Winner, and Bowl Games? Cuse has more wins than MSU and against VT!

All games are 4 quarters, so I don't know what you mean that their wins are just 2 quarter wins. That doesn't make sense.

Yes. PSU's 9 wins are superior to our 7. We lost 2 games to teams with 3 losses & we lost 51-28 to a mediocre 7-4 Miami team. PSU still has a chance to win what is arguably one of the toughest divisions in college football. We are left to play out the string.

The CFP thinks PSU deserves to be rated higher than Pitt. The AP & Coaches do too. I think a few posters on this board are the only people that have a problem with it. I bet every coach in the ACC voted PSU higher than Pitt. Do they have a pro-Big 10 agenda too?

This is being decided on the field. Had we beaten VaTech & UNC, we would be in the discussion too.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT