ADVERTISEMENT

Perception vs reality - the brand

You can argue the fairness all you want. I didn't make up the definition/criteria of which are the major bowls nor when they became major bowls. Pitt was not the only independent then. Independent Notre Dame played in the Sugar, Orange and Cotton Bowls. Independent Syracuse played in major bowl games. Independent Penn State played in the Orange, Sugar and Cotton Bowls and
numerous Fiesta Bowls before 1987 and NO ONE counts those Fiesta Bowls prior to 1987 as a major bowl but you want to count it for Pitt? You are WRONGLY changing criteria to suit yourself and create your own Pitt-serving definition.
No I’m not…I’m saying you are cherry picking facts and using a narrow definition to say the program wasn’t as good as it was back then.
 
I think this is Packer’s point.

I disagree about VT. I think they are in a next tier with 2 to 3 other teams. And I would have those teams even above them. But that can be debated.

But a conference needs its high ceiling teams to play up to its ceiling. Because you cannot replace those teams in terms of national perception.

The middle of a conference you can. If VT sucked but NC State was playing to its ceiling, nothing would be lost. Because their ceilings are probably interchangeable.

But if FSU sucks and NC State is good, something is lost for the conference. Because NC State’s ceiling is not FSU’s.

And if you aren’t the SEC, where you are flushed with high ceiling NC-worthy type teams, you basically need all of them to be peaking.
@cashisking884

This subject has obviously grown as a post, but I think you got this back to the original question; and I totally agree with you that Clemson & FSU have to be among the top 3 in the ACC each year to maintain a conference relevance. As for the others? Miami, Pitt, and maybe NC, NC State & VT, brand-wise, fit the national recognition "mold" for football.

If any two of those 7 mentioned teams played for the ACC Championship each year going forward, it would be ok; if either Clemson or FSU were one of the two teams, it would be great. If it were always Clemson and FSU, it would be akin to 'Bama vs UGA/LSU in the SEC or OSU/Michigan in the B1G as far as national recognition as a must see game

It's unfortunate that the last 6 ACC Conference Championship games have been lopsided blowouts. I think it'll be a much more interesting and close game now that there are no more Atlantic and Coastal divisions
 
No I’m not…I’m saying you are cherry picking facts and using a narrow definition to say the program wasn’t as good as it was back then.
2 major wins since 1950. None since 1982. Live with it. Facts are facts. You can't handle the truth obviously. We're done.
 
We are arguing different things. It appears that your original intent was to discredit Pitt by saying they have only won 2 major bowls in 75 years when those bowls were considered Major Bowls. My point there is that its unfair since only a handful of independent teams were eligible to play in those bowls and even then invites weren't always the highest ranked teams. A perfect example of this was the 1980 Pitt team that finished 2nd in the country but ended up playing in the Gator Bowl. They were ranked 3rd in the country going into that game but because they didn't play in and win a "Major" bowl that year it doesn't matter to you. Same with the 1979 team that was 10-1 but was ranked 10th because of biased voters so they got passed (or didn't have the conference tie in) over by other big conference teams for the major bowls. To discredit that team because they got stuck in the Fiesta bowl because of conference politics and BS is ridiculous. And to say the Fiesta was not a major is fine. But don't forget that other major bowls (i.e. Cotton Bowl from from the late 80s to the 4 team playoff started in 2014) weren't always considered major as well. And in the past other bowls like Sun and Liberty were considered bigger and drew big tv audiences over bowls that are considered major today.
That's exactly it. For instance, the Gator Bowl's Pitt played in where they beat Clemson and South Carolina, Pitt should have been in one of the major bowls as it finished top 5. But, people forget there was only 3 at large "major" bowl slots, Sugar, Orange and Cotton. The Gator back then was the 5th almost major bowl. You usually had ND taking one of those 3 slots. Back then Oklahoma/Nebraska loser would go to one of those slots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 303vND and Gep Dawg
Fine, but it historically has a large commuter population.
So we need to think badly of Pitt because we USED TO be a commuter school? And a new stadium is a bad idea.
 
So we need to think badly of Pitt because we USED TO be a commuter school? And a new stadium is a bad idea.
Where did I say anything about Pitt being bad? My comment was about the size of Pitt’s fanbase.
 
That's exactly it. For instance, the Gator Bowl's Pitt played in where they beat Clemson and South Carolina, Pitt should have been in one of the major bowls as it finished top 5. But, people forget there was only 3 at large "major" bowl slots, Sugar, Orange and Cotton. The Gator back then was the 5th almost major bowl. You usually had ND taking one of those 3 slots. Back then Oklahoma/Nebraska loser would go to one of those slots.
Thank you, I didn't think I was stating anything outlandish or far fetched here.

Not even sure why, what would appear to be a Pitt fan (who knows for sure these days) would be so hell bent on putting down his own team so superficially anyway??

Who knows the internet is a strange place these days
 
Georgia Tech faces a lot of the same issues as Miami with regard to the pro sports teams, and even more (college-wise) with UGA residing just 70 miles away.

Regarding VT, I lump them into a similar mold as Penn State. Almost a cult like fan base, large on-campus stadium, the only game-in-town for miles around ... but as you say, without a national championship
GTs biggest obstacle by far is UGA

The Falcons don’t really factor in all that much

The entire state though has a ton of Dawg fans way more than Falcons fans.
 
That's exactly it. For instance, the Gator Bowl's Pitt played in where they beat Clemson and South Carolina, Pitt should have been in one of the major bowls as it finished top 5. But, people forget there was only 3 at large "major" bowl slots, Sugar, Orange and Cotton. The Gator back then was the 5th almost major bowl. You usually had ND taking one of those 3 slots. Back then Oklahoma/Nebraska loser would go to one of those slots.
Well stated!! Clearly he's either too young to know that or just doesn't understand!
 
GTs biggest obstacle by far is UGA

The Falcons don’t really factor in all that much

The entire state though has a ton of Dawg fans way more than Falcons fans.

GT’s biggest obstacle is academics.

It kills their recruiting.

Kills their ability to get transfers, which is particularly important for programs at their level.

And really hurts their ability to keep players in the now transfer free era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittdan77
GT’s biggest obstacle is academics.

It kills their recruiting.

Kills their ability to get transfers, which is particularly important for programs at their level.

And really hurts their ability to keep players in the now transfer free era.
Someone posted their course guide a few weeks ago. I'm actually shocked that GT is as competitive as they are with the available options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cashisking884
Someone posted their course guide a few weeks ago. I'm actually shocked that GT is as competitive as they are with the available options.

And then imagine you’ve made a name for yourself. You’re maybe 1 year away from the NFL.

Why stay at GT doing that coursework for one more year? I guess if GT is running an offense so unique that you’re scared of learning and fitting into a new scheme in one offseason. But that’s probably not going to be the case.

So you transfer to an easier school for that last year. And now GT needs to land a transfer to replace you. But how many schools out there even have the the type credits that would transfer? That’s the problem either UVA or Duke had this past offseason. They already lost some of their 2023 transfers because they were academically ineligible due to the credits not transferring. And GT is that x 10.

It’s a brutal job to win at. And now they can’t even just go back to the option for a schematic advantage, because the NCAA has killed that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittdan77
And then imagine you’ve made a name for yourself. You’re maybe 1 year away from the NFL.

Why stay at GT doing that coursework for one more year? I guess if GT is running an offense so unique that you’re scared of learning and fitting into a new scheme in one offseason. But that’s probably not going to be the case.

So you transfer to an easier school for that last year. And now GT needs to land a transfer to replace you. But how many schools out there even have the the type credits that would transfer? That’s the problem either UVA or Duke had this past offseason. They already lost some of their 2023 transfers because they were academically ineligible due to the credits not transferring. And GT is that x 10.

It’s a brutal job to win at. And now they can’t even just go back to the option for a schematic advantage, because the NCAA has killed that.
GT: 1470 average SAT...that's the highest of all public schools in the US.
 
by who? Recruits don't complain about facilities. Opposing fans are usually very impressed. Talk to some Tennessee fans. Did you go to the game at UCF? The stadium was literally a glorified high school stadium.
I was at the Pitt vs UCF in Orlando. I thought the stadium was pretty nice. I did sit in the box with food and seats outside and below the box. Also had a field pass which could have made me like the stadium more.
 
Four years ago, Stewart Mandel predicted that eventually college football would form a 28-team league.

He called it the College Football Premier League.

A hypothetical 28-team league in which the top two teams in each division make an eight-team playoff. Schools were selected based on criteria like TV ratings, attendance figures, recent success and historical success.

Pitt was not one of those 28 teams. West Virginia is. Despite regularly producing NFL greats, not having won a major bowl game since 1982 doesn't help Pitt’s case. Nor does having won only two major bowl games in more than 75 years. That may be the reality on how Pitt is viewed by others.

The 28 teams were:
Clemson

lowa

Alabama

Oklahoma

Florida

Michigan

Arkansas

Oregon

Florida State

Michigan State

Miami

Nebraska

Auburn

Texas

Georgia

Texas A&M

Penn State

Notre Dame

LSU

UCLA

Virginia Tech

Ohio State

South Carolina

USC

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Tennessee

Washington
It amazes me that people would watch CRAP like this, I could understand if YOUR SCHOOL is in it, but if mine is excluded, I would find it impossible to care about and am 1000% I wouldn't watch a single game, I'd be watching Pitt/YSU on the CW Network while Bama was playing tOSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revampedpanthers
What I find HILARIOUS is I've heard Pitt fans say, if Pitt is left out of the BIG league, they'd lose interest and adopt a team in the BIG league to root for, WTF? it's unreal to me, I'm a Pitt fan, and it has nothing to do with what level they are, and if they're not at the highest level, then I won't watch any of the highest-level games. I'll watch Pitt games, even if they're playing CMU and W&J.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FireballZ
It amazes me that people would watch CRAP like this, I could understand if YOUR SCHOOL is in it, but if mine is excluded, I would find it impossible to care about and am 1000% I wouldn't watch a single game, I'd be watching Pitt/YSU on the CW Network while Bama was playing tOSU.

But you’ve said you don’t watch college football anyway if I’m thinking of the correct poster/avatar.
 
But you’ve said you don’t watch college football anyway if I’m thinking of the correct poster/avatar.
I do watch college football, I've probably watched 60 minutes of every Pitt game, from beginning to end going back to the 70s, a lot of the games I've rewatched, I've also attended maybe 100 in person, some on the road. Also, sometimes I might watch some other games, so to say I don't watch college football is false.
 
But you’ve said you don’t watch college football anyway if I’m thinking of the correct poster/avatar.

So, I suppose you care more about the level, watching Pitt to you is less important than watching the highest level of college football?
 
So, I suppose you care more about the level, watching Pitt to you is less important than watching the highest level of college football?

What does any of that have to do with people that just like watching college football?
 
I do watch college football, I've probably watched 60 minutes of every Pitt game, from beginning to end going back to the 70s, a lot of the games I've rewatched, I've also attended maybe 100 in person, some on the road. Also, sometimes I might watch some other games, so to say I don't watch college football is false.

“Sometimes I might watch some other games” is kind of my point.

You’re not the “college football” audience.
 
What would you choose to watch, Pitt in a lesser league or the top ranked teams in some super league if given the choice?

But that’s not the choice.

You’re asking why would anybody watch it if their team isn’t in it?

Lots of “college football” fans turn their tv on when the first game comes on, and fall asleep to PAC 12 after dark. And watch their team during that schedule.

You don’t. You don’t really even understand that mindset. And that’s fine. My only point is that you don’t understand that mindset.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FireballZ
But that’s not the choice.

You’re asking why would anybody watch it if their team isn’t in it?

Lots of “college football” fans turn their tv on when the first game comes on, and fall asleep to PAC 12 after dark. And watch their team during that schedule.

You don’t. You don’t really even understand that mindset. And that’s fine. My only point is that you don’t understand that mindset.
I guess. the only people that I know that do that are in the nursing home.

If anyone has anything to do (you know, those of us NOT in the nursing home yet), they usually budget the time for their team only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitt79
What I find HILARIOUS is I've heard Pitt fans say, if Pitt is left out of the BIG league, they'd lose interest and adopt a team in the BIG league to root for, WTF? it's unreal to me, I'm a Pitt fan, and it has nothing to do with what level they are, and if they're not at the highest level, then I won't watch any of the highest-level games. I'll watch Pitt games, even if they're playing CMU and W&J.
Well,

More people attend / follow major league baseball than AAA ball.

That is essentially where Pitt is headed.

I dont blame any Pitt fan for deciding to become say, an LSU fan. Or a Texas fan.

Much in the same way i dont fault anyone for being interested in the Pirates but could care less about the Indianapolis Indians.

Go ahead and blast away, but that is exactly where Pitt is headed.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FireballZ
But that’s not the choice.

You’re asking why would anybody watch it if their team isn’t in it?

Lots of “college football” fans turn their tv on when the first game comes on, and fall asleep to PAC 12 after dark. And watch their team during that schedule.

You don’t. You don’t really even understand that mindset. And that’s fine. My only point is that you don’t understand that mindset.
You seriously waste 12-14 hours watching TV on every beautiful fall Saturday?

And it is the choice, what if Pitt is playing Akron at the same time Bama is playing tOSU, which ARE YOU watching?
 
Well,

More people attend / follow major league baseball than AAA ball.

That is essentially where Pitt is headed.

I dont blame any Pitt fan for deciding to become say, an LSU fan. Or a Texas fan.

Much in the same way i dont fault anyone for being interested in the Pirates but could care less about the Indianapolis Indians.

Go ahead and blast away, but that is exactly where Pitt is headed.
My question is HOW COULD YOU become an LSU or Texas fan; the whole idea makes me want to vomit. I'm PITT4LIFE no matter what. So you're picking another team and dropping Pitt in that situation?
 
Well,

More people attend / follow major league baseball than AAA ball.

That is essentially where Pitt is headed.

I dont blame any Pitt fan for deciding to become say, an LSU fan. Or a Texas fan.

Much in the same way i dont fault anyone for being interested in the Pirates but could care less about the Indianapolis Indians.

Go ahead and blast away, but that is exactly where Pitt is headed.
no matter where we are headed, no level of college football will be the major leagues. that is the NFL. the P2 may be the major league of college, but it isn't nor will never be the major league of football, it is minor league football with the attraction being your school affiliation, which AAA baseball does not have. I will always root for Pitt and watch Pitt. I may watch another college but have no vested interest in the outcome of the game.
 
My question is HOW COULD YOU become an LSU or Texas fan; the whole idea makes me want to vomit. I'm PITT4LIFE no matter what. So you're picking another team and dropping Pitt in that situation?
Am I dropping Pitt?

No. I will continue to donate as that is important to me

But i am not interested in a league that is percieved as (and likely proven to be) second rate.

Id rather watch the best play the best.

I know you and i differ on this and thats cool.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FireballZ
Am I dropping Pitt?

No. I will continue to donate as that is important to me

But i am not interested in a league that is percieved as (and likely proven to be) second rate.

Id rather watch the best play the best.

I know you and i differ on this and thats cool.
Then you are not really a fan of Pitt football. You are a fan of the sport of college football, more than a Pitt specific fan. I'm a fan of Pitt football itself above college football as a whole. But that's cool, to each his own.
 
no matter where we are headed, no level of college football will be the major leagues. that is the NFL. the P2 may be the major league of college, but it isn't nor will never be the major league of football, it is minor league football with the attraction being your school affiliation, which AAA baseball does not have. I will always root for Pitt and watch Pitt. I may watch another college but have no vested interest in the outcome of the game.
I agree, I'm a Pitt fan first, way more than a fan of the best quality football, if I'm watching Pitt play Rhode Island, I'm hanging on the edge of my seat for every play desperately rooting for Pitt, if I'm watching Georgia vs. tOSU I'm only mildly entertained and may turn it off, because I'll get bored because I don't care who wins at all.
 
For northern schools I think Pitts ceiling is every bit as high as a Michigan State or Washington. Meaning, they absolutely can get to and compete in a playoff. And they can absolutely be one of the big dogs in the acc.

I’m pretty confident in saying that we won’t see Miami and Free Shoes University to the levels of the early 90s again. VT too for late 90s early 00s. Clemson has reached it peak, which is incredibly high. I think UNC has a very high ceiling and so does GT in football.

The more Pitt churns out 9+ wins a season and continues to have its fans invest in the program, and am having the program produce remarkable talent at the pro level, and it’s advertised, you will see Pitts brand and perception nationally rise. If KP plays in the Peach Bowl they beat Sparty by 10-21. The more Pitt produces, the more perception changes. Heck I think Pitt is in a better situation from a football standpoint than it’s been in nearly 40 years. HCPN knows they can compete at the highest level. And I think the trajectory is evident that Pitt could start making some decent noise nationally. Further, they have such a perfect and clean and unique logo in script Pitt that it can catch on too in the market of people who just like the logo and follow the team because of AD and Pickett, etc. That’s value.

I’m bullish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gopitt1976
It will never happen unless there is an administration change at GT which allows them to run their program differently, but given all the talent in the area, GT could be a major player. At least they've won a national championship about 30 years ago. Has VT ever won one? I'm pretty sure VT has never won a national championship in any sport. Even BC and Syracuse have football national championships.
Syracuse main problem is their recruiting area, base, football is a second or third for most players in the New England states.
 
no matter where we are headed, no level of college football will be the major leagues. that is the NFL. the P2 may be the major league of college, but it isn't nor will never be the major league of football, it is minor league football with the attraction being your school affiliation, which AAA baseball does not have. I will always root for Pitt and watch Pitt. I may watch another college but have no vested interest in the outcome of the game.

For northern schools I think Pitts ceiling is every bit as high as a Michigan State or Washington. Meaning, they absolutely can get to and compete in a playoff. And they can absolutely be one of the big dogs in the acc.

I’m pretty confident in saying that we won’t see Miami and Free Shoes University to the levels of the early 90s again. VT too for late 90s early 00s. Clemson has reached it peak, which is incredibly high. I think UNC has a very high ceiling and so does GT in football.

The more Pitt churns out 9+ wins a season and continues to have its fans invest in the program, and am having the program produce remarkable talent at the pro level, and it’s advertised, you will see Pitts brand and perception nationally rise. If KP plays in the Peach Bowl they beat Sparty by 10-21. The more Pitt produces, the more perception changes. Heck I think Pitt is in a better situation from a football standpoint than it’s been in nearly 40 years. HCPN knows they can compete at the highest level. And I think the trajectory is evident that Pitt could start making some decent noise nationally. Further, they have such a perfect and clean and unique logo in script Pitt that it can catch on too in the market of people who just like the logo and follow the team because of AD and Pickett, etc. That’s value.

I’m bullish.
I appreciate and respect your opinion but i will disagree with almost all of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSSTartan
But that’s not the choice.

You’re asking why would anybody watch it if their team isn’t in it?

Lots of “college football” fans turn their tv on when the first game comes on, and fall asleep to PAC 12 after dark. And watch their team during that schedule.

You don’t. You don’t really even understand that mindset. And that’s fine. My only point is that you don’t understand that mindset.
I get it, you're not a real Pitt fan, you're a fan of the highest quality college football in a generic sense. to you it's not about loyalty or obsession for the blue & gold, or H2P, it's about wanting to see the best play the best, and if Pitt isn't in that group, you'll watch some other better teams play instead, that's fine, you're a casual Pitt fan, you don't bleed blue & gold, you're a fan of the sport as a whole more than the team the Pitt Panthers, you're the college football audience, I'm Pitt obsessed, and that's all good.
 
I get it, you're not a real Pitt fan, you're a fan of the highest quality college football in a generic sense. to you it's not about loyalty or obsession for the blue & gold, or H2P, it's about wanting to see the best play the best, and if Pitt isn't in that group, you'll watch some other better teams play instead, that's fine, you're a casual Pitt fan, you don't bleed blue & gold, you're a fan of the sport as a whole more than the team the Pitt Panthers, you're the college football audience, I'm Pitt obsessed, and that's all good.

I think you’re confusing me with the other poster.
 
For northern schools I think Pitts ceiling is every bit as high as a Michigan State or Washington. Meaning, they absolutely can get to and compete in a playoff. And they can absolutely be one of the big dogs in the acc.
MSU and Washington made it to a 4 team playoff. I would not really say they were competitive in the playoff. But if TCU was able to compete, for one game at least, then I think Pitt could be able to.
 
MSU and Washington made it to a 4 team playoff. I would not really say they were competitive in the playoff. But if TCU was able to compete, for one game at least, then I think Pitt could be able to.

And MSU hasn’t really been competitive with the northern recruiting power since then. Forget the southern ones.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT