Sucks you cant write it off anymore
from the heart, eh?Sucks you cant write it off anymore
I know there is typically a big rush and big donors drop at the end, but how is this year comparing to past years?
2019 had 6,346 donors for a total of $4,218,250.
With 7 hours left there have been 4,628 donors for a total of $891,223. I'd say 2020 is quite a bit behind $ wise, but we'll have to see if any big donations drop in the evening.
Beat the number of donors with 3 hours to go but behind on $$$$$
The number of donors is important because that speaks to engagement which Pitt desperately needs to improve. There just may not be as many big donations this year, but getting over 7K donors is a success.
"Pitt Day of Giving (PDoG) 2020 was a tremendous success. With 7,630 individuals making gifts, more than in any previous year, the Pitt Community supported hundreds of projects and programs that—together—make Pitt exceptional. Gifts were made from all 50 states and 31 countries. More than $1.6 Million was raised to support schools, colleges, athletics, student organizations, and an array of Pitt programs. Thank you to each of our 2020 Pitt Day of Giving donors!"what was the final number
I just received a "Thank You" email that includes more information.what was the final number
While >7K donors is a modest improvement over last year, it is still remarkable how small a % of alumni participate, not just on one day, but throughout an entire year. Particularly I notice how few Dietrich School of A&S alumni give back considering it is, by far, the largest component of the university.
I wonder if creating something akin to "championship" funds for each department within Dietrich and then separately targeting alumni of the individual departments, instead of the whole school overall, would promote more engagement and giving. I personally would be more inclined to give to my former home department rather than the overall school itself. I'd set up an endowed chair fund in each department with a $50 to $100K match challenge for each of the ~45 departments which could be funded by the Dietrich Foundation's approximately $6 million annual disbursement to Dietrich School's endowment fund. In theory you could have a significant number of newly endowed chairs in 10 years if you succeeded in maxing the match annually for even half the departments.
While >7K donors is a modest improvement over last year, it is still remarkable how small a % of alumni participate, not just on one day, but throughout an entire year. Particularly I notice how few Dietrich School of A&S alumni give back considering it is, by far, the largest component of the university.
I wonder if creating something akin to "championship" funds for each department within Dietrich and then separately targeting alumni of the individual departments, instead of the whole school overall, would promote more engagement and giving. I personally would be more inclined to give to my former home department rather than the overall school itself. I'd set up an endowed chair fund in each department with a $50 to $100K match challenge for each of the ~45 departments which could be funded by the Dietrich Foundation's approximately $6 million annual disbursement to Dietrich School's endowment fund. In theory you could have a significant number of newly endowed chairs in 10 years if you succeeded in maxing the match annually for even half the departments.
I personally think this is a good idea. People tend to think within their own dept or group.
Not necessarily. Perhaps for small, annual gifts. But often times the larger principal gifts will affect the university as a whole.
Not necessarily. Perhaps for small, annual gifts. But often times the larger principal gifts will affect the university as a whole.
Not necessarily. Perhaps for small, annual gifts. But often times the larger principal gifts will affect the university as a whole.
Endowed chairs cost millions of dollars. That’s not something you can really tackle in a day of giving.
Usually $2 million a chair. That's why I said it would happen over a decade using matching challenges funded from the Dietrich Foundation's distributions to the school (which must go the school endowment anyway). $100K X 10 years + match = $2 mill after a decade. Now say half the departments achieve that...that's 22 new chairs. And no, it would just be a one day fundraising campaign; the one day is just one annual push out of an entire year of fundraising.
Who is the "match"?
Yes, I was talking about improving alumni engagement and in terms of attempting to greatly increasing small to medium gifts (100s to thousands), which is sort of what the Day of Giving is about. That is a different target than major gifts.
The match I propose is funded by Dietrich Foundation annual distribution to the School of Arts & Sciences. The "$125m" gift William Dietrich gave to Pitt was actually ~25% of the Foundation's annual distributions from its ~$500m endowment. CMU gets ~50%, and multiple organizations divvy up the remaining 25% (including the Duquesne, Thiel, Princeton, the Carnegie Museums, the Pittsburgh symphony, boy scouts and others). Pitt's portion of its annual distribution is paid directly into Pitt endowment and restricted to the School of Arts & Sciences and it currently amounts to ~$6 million a year. Bill Dietrich's idea here to set it up this way would be for his gifts to actually continue to grow in perpetuity as the Dietrich Foundation's endowment also grew. It's and endowment for the institutions' endowments.
Actually, the Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences has already attempted to use the Foundation's annual disbursement as a match for endowed fund creation (i.e. major endowed gifts). It was fairly poorly publicized, but they attempted it and I don't know if it is still an option for individuals looking to start an endowed fund.
This is poorly communicated to alumni & in my opinion and needs to open up to all the schools. Just my 2 cents
It isThis is poorly communicated to alumni & in my opinion and needs to open up to all the schools. Just my 2 cents