I am no long defending the Capel regime but I suspect with our NIL budget, short guard that can't shoot is going to be who our next coach gets too. Hopefully he has some other attributes to make up for it.short guard that can't shoot. Capel specialty.
And hope Minor has a great season as well team so we're successful. H2P!!!!I am no long defending the Capel regime but I suspect with our NIL budget, short guard that can't shoot is going to be who our next coach gets too. Hopefully he has some other attributes to make up for it.
Fwiw Oregon State fans have seemed to taken to calling him "a Pitbull" so maybe he has "that dog in him" as the kids say.And hope Minor has a great season as well team so we're successful. H2P!!!!
If this is truly the case, then what is the point?but I suspect with our NIL budget, short guard that can't shoot is going to be who our next coach gets too.
Shoots 1.5% better from deep than Lowe. So there's that...short guard that can't shoot. Capel specialty.
I am no long defending the Capel regime but I suspect with our NIL budget, short guard that can't shoot is going to be who our next coach gets too. Hopefully he has some other attributes to make up for it.
Rutgers had 2 guys who will be top 5 in the draft and still suckedwhy not allocate 80% of the budget to a superstar and then try and piece a roster together with guys who are buried on benches and want a new look? Why sit here and pay for guys who can't shoot? I know the budget isn't great but the allocation is worse.
Do you have any examples of where this worked in NIL era college basketball? I'm not asking facetiously, serious question.why not allocate 80% of the budget to a superstar and then try and piece a roster together with guys who are buried on benches and want a new look? Why sit here and pay for guys who can't shoot? I know the budget isn't great but the allocation is worse.
short guard that can't shoot. Capel specialty.
The only positive thing I can think of is that the offseason Capel added Elliott, Nelly, Hinson, Fede, etc it didn’t seem to optimistic at this point either.Maybe he can play decent defense. Don't we already have a short kid at PG? This is very underwhelming. But expected from the Capel trainwreck.
The only positive thing I can think of is that the offseason Capel added Elliott, Nelly, Hinson, Fede, etc it didn’t seem to optimistic at this point either.
It’s worth a shot maybe but those stars have far better optionswhy not allocate 80% of the budget to a superstar and then try and piece a roster together with guys who are buried on benches and want a new look? Why sit here and pay for guys who can't shoot? I know the budget isn't great but the allocation is worse.
He was rated 268th in the portal . Where’s your figure from ?the pickups verify the lack of support? We just gave the starting center from ISU $1.3mm to come here and play for a season
He was rated 268th in the portal . Where’s your figure from ?
He played less than 19 minutes per scoring less than 9 pts and 5 rebounds per game . I seriously doubt that’s worth 1.3 !
Would be nice as bench piece, but I fear you're likely right. Hopefully they can pickup another guard or two who can shoot.8.5 rebounds per game the year before last is pretty wild for a guy who is only 6 feet tall. That said, this pickup makes me think either I don't get it or Capel doesn't get it. Low % shooter whose success seems to have come mostly from volume. And I hardly think this solves the size and length issues we've struggled with. I have no doubt that he's scrappy, but 6'0" is 6'0". Like, didn't we just watch this movie?
Since he's averaged 32.63 minutes per game over the last three seasons, I think it's safe to assume he isn't coming here to waste his final year of college basketball being some bench piece. Just not thrilled with this pickup on paper. Maybe I'm an idiot.
Rutgers has always suckedRutgers had 2 guys who will be top 5 in the draft and still sucked
Barry Dunning Jr. is not a yawn. 15 and 7 as a big guard. Jackson and Indrusaitis are interesting, Iowa State won a tournament game, hard to say their ceiling, but were top 100 HS recruits. Omari Witherspoon may be the most promising, top 90-100 HS recruit.So far for Pitt....YAWN.
Barry Dunning Jr. is not a yawn. 15 and 7 as a big guard. Jackson and Indrusaitis are interesting, Iowa State won a tournament game, hard to say their ceiling, but were top 100 HS recruits. Omari Witherspoon may be the most promising, top 90-100 HS recruit.
Now does that combine with Cummings into a tournament team? Strongly doubt it. That's not enough here yet but I don't see these guys a a stretch for an ACC team.
I have heard Pitt’s NIL is between $4.5-5m but that’s loose and could also include actual NIL and sponsorship and not just pay for play $$ I also heard that PSU BB is $4m and that Purdue had the lowest NIL of any Sweet 16 team at $6 million. Totally unverified but this is a message board where sources don’t matter so take that info with a grain of salt.
You’re right you don’t have any idea . Look at the guys they’re signing , this isn’t a program flush with cash .Fsgolf coming to tell you that there's no way you could possibly know that right before declaring, in his very next sentence, that Pitt's total NIL was less than what a shift supervisor at Speedway makes in 3... 2...
I have heard Pitt’s NIL is between $4.5-5m
I have to assume you're trolling us all at this point.You’re right you don’t have any idea . Look at the guys they’re signing , this isn’t a program flush with cash .
Better programs keep their core and take the best portal players to fill their needs .( or sign 5* hs players)
It doesn’t matter what the actual numbers are , what matters is what the competition is willing to pay and if Sheetz is willing to pay you 50% more than what you make at Speedway my advise to you is to put your application in at Sheetz ! ( feel free to to use me as a reference)
I’ve never said Pitts players aren’t compensated nicely, I’ve said they don’t have enough money to field a complete highly competitive team at a national level . ( their record and the holes in the lineup tell you this too .)
So have we most of the last 10 years. In fact they have made more tournaments probablyRutgers has always sucked
I’d love to assume that. Because the alternative is worse. But sadly I think it’s the alternative.I have to assume you're trolling us all at this point.
![]()
Reality bites when you see what is happening to teams without enough resources to compete . You guys want to put all this on one man while I don’t care who the coach is , because without the cash nobody is going to get the necessary talent to win .I’d love to assume that. Because the alternative is worse. But sadly I think it’s the alternative.
Well if they had that type of winning experience then they wouldn’t be of this caliber.Welcome aboard and I hope to be pleasantly surprised, but if we are going to take players of this caliber, I'd prefer to get them from winning programs with experience leading teams to the NCAAT.