ADVERTISEMENT

Populous Architecture Firm - Stadium examples

It's funny how so many of you want to discuss detailed ideas all the time, and the actual athletic depart doesn't even have this on a vague "maybe to do list''.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eastcoasthoops
It's funny how so many of you want to discuss detailed ideas all the time, and the actual athletic depart doesn't even have this on a vague "maybe to do list''.
what athletic dept? You mean the AD that went home to care for his ailing 83 year old grandmother or the one before him that got rid of the script for block PIttsburgh and added a seal as our logo? Which one are you referring too?

I value the opinion of this board way more than that of our ever failing athletic dept. Our athletic dept and its' leadership over the better part of a century have been the biggest enemies of success, the athletic dept at pitt is the biggest obstacle, is it's own worst enemy..
 
  • Like
Reactions: NTOP
I think you've really nailed it. Even if there was a political appetite to tackle this kind of project i think many underestimate the difficulty in buying up all that property. It's not like you just have to deal with a single lander owner. You're talking about negotiating with hundreds? Would be very hard to keep the property acquisition costs reasonable.

Depends on where the location is. Pitt should have spent the last two decades doing just that, in a spot where they wouldn't have to deal with a lot of private property and people's homes, and ideally would already own much of the land. Actually, Pitt should have built the Pete in a location that required a smaller footprint, perhaps the originally proposed location, and then updated or rebuilt Pitt Stadium.

It certainly wouldn't have been impossible, considering that Oakland real estate acquisitions and prices over the last decade.

But since they've putzed around and pretended that Heinz Field is great, it won't happen. Maybe if they were to promise some public housing in place of luxury suites, it would have a chance to pass politically.

Pitt would still need a mega donor who cares about football, and we certainly aren't helping that cause when affinity can't be built transporting students to football games on yellow school buses, and sending them to games in an unmaintained stadium before that, and sending them to games after purposely deemphasizing football before that. That's 30 years of graduates being part of a sub-par product most of the time

Any site that has more than a few houses to buy up is a non-starter.

I know its not my money but Pitt should have a 50 year plan to buy every single South Oakland home to rent out. Then when you own enough, raze the whole neighborhood and build nicer stuff there whether it be new student apartments, classroom buildings, or a stadium.
 
Sounds like a high school track without a concession stand. Do they really need Populous for that?
When I first arrived in Pgh, I was delighted to hear of the "Pitt Relays". Coming from Philly, where I often went to Franklin Field for the Penn Relays....and NCAA championship there in 1962, I grabbed my 2 stopwatches and a notepad, and trucked into Oakland. Sat there with about 14 of my newest Pittsburgh friends to watch schools like Mt. Saint Mary, Akron and Point Park compete with the Panthers. Wow.
All you need is one taco truck for concessions, or a tailgate setup parked on the street. It just shows how difficult finding space in Oakland will be. 19 years gone. What's interesting is Pitt won the college 4x400 relay at Penn a couple years ago, trashing several "blueblood" schools. That was 75 years after their prior win.
 
it would be awesome, I mean absolutely incredible. but there seem to be more pressing issues and Heinz is.. well Heinz is suitable I guess is the word. adequate maybe..

to play Devil's advocate here, we can accomplish our goals of being a top program in the coastal with our current stadium situation. It's not hindering us from becoming a good program. It's boring as all hell, an eyesore of course but in reality, its not holding us back from accomplishing a 10+ win season. There are multiple other reasons that are holding us back. cookie cutter stadium with the ambience of a funeral isn't one of them..
All true. As for the funeral atmosphere, it's because of the countless losses and overall bad teams, not the stadium. PNC Park is gorgeous, yet a tedious bore to be when (as typical) the Pirates suck. Conversely, boring Ole Heinz has ROCKED in the disgustingly few truly big games we were won at home (this program is so backward that even when we pull off shockers, it's on the road).

Hell, I've been to "big" Steelers, Penguins, and Pitt home games (both hoops and football), and hands down, the Pitt crowds are more raucous. We have it in us. It just needs the dumbkopf administration to unleash it.
 
It's funny how so many of you want to discuss detailed ideas all the time, and the actual athletic depart doesn't even have this on a vague "maybe to do list''.
At this point you just hope they have "avoid multi-annual laughingstock fiascoes" on that fabled list. Failed at that last year (Stallings, Barnes). On the clock for 17 but not looking too promising (as the OC crisis careens into Month 3, and the Stallings debacle grows worse). What next, combine the AD with the Dean of Accounting?
 
Where would they build a track and field facility? People love to talk about Oakland being too built up and not having room for a stadium, but it's not like a track facility is small either.

By the way, has Populous ever built a track facility that wasn't a stadium?

WWW.NEWPITTSTADIUM.COM

It's in there. Pitt has been acquiring land on the Hill for a long time.
 
LOLOL, The New Pitt Stadium Supporters and are on offense here. The naysayers are on defense.. unlike our hoop team. Also, they lack the fundamental understanding that building a basketball arena and losing by 50 is not the same as building a 50K on campus football stadium. In fact, FOOTBALL DRIVES THE CAR NOW FOLKS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Delpanther
At this point you just hope they have "avoid multi-annual laughingstock fiascoes" on that fabled list. Failed at that last year (Stallings, Barnes). On the clock for 17 but not looking too promising (as the OC crisis careens into Month 3, and the Stallings debacle grows worse). What next, combine the AD with the Dean of Accounting?
I don't know about any of that, I do know for sure that a new stadium in Oakland is nowhere on the radar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittdan77
At this point, I think the only place you'd see a stadium in the near future (not saying we will) would be in the OC Lot/Cost Center. There wouldn't be any land acquistion costs and parking could be replaced with a new garage near the site.
 
Make a deal with the City and Housing Authority to build on the lots that include Kennard Playground and space to the east of it.
 
At this point, I think the only place you'd see a stadium in the near future (not saying we will) would be in the OC Lot/Cost Center. There wouldn't be any land acquistion costs and parking could be replaced with a new garage near the site.

There is definitely room to do it up there as everything between the VA and Robinson is expendable. I don't see it happening but it is possible.
 
Make a deal with the City and Housing Authority to build on the lots that include Kennard Playground and space to the east of it.

It really is too bad Pitt couldn't grab that patch of land between Kennard and the sports complex. Would have been perfect.
 
to play Devil's advocate here, we can accomplish our goals of being a top program in the coastal with our current stadium situation. It's not hindering us from becoming a good program. It's boring as all hell, an eyesore of course but in reality, its not holding us back from accomplishing a 10+ win season. There are multiple other reasons that are holding us back. cookie cutter stadium with the ambience of a funeral isn't one of them..

I do not agree with that assertion.

I think playing in a stadium that is at least 10-15K seats too large is definitely hindering us. In fact, I don't think we can reach our full potential as a program if we continue playing at Heinz Field.

It's just too big for us and it always will be.

Please don't misconstrue what I'm saying here. I'm not talking about knocking down Hillman Library to build a stadium in Oakland or going into a billion dollars in debt to fund something that is used only 8–10 times per year.

Also, I am well aware of the infrastructural challenges a football stadium in Oakland would present. I've already lived it for many years so I well know the challenges and opportunities involved. I also know that the proponents of on campus stadium always understate that issue while the opponents of it always exaggerate it.

It was crowded getting in and out and there's no denying that point. However, it wasn't exactly "Beyond ThunderDome" (if you catch my drift).

I always thought getting home to the South Hills from the Civic Arena after a Penguins game was just as difficult. You basically had to cut across people going to the north and east on Center Avenue and it bottlenecked in about 10 different places and was often a miserable experience. Sometimes PPG Paints Arena can also be tough – depending on where are you park.

Somehow, through the grace of God, I have survived all of those experiences hundreds of times over the years.

Getting back to the University of Pittsburgh, it doesn't make any sense to not at least have this conversation. Why wouldn't we want to know where we could put an on campus stadium and what it would cost? Those are pretty germane points, don't you think?

I mean, quite frankly, that means a lot more to me than whether or not we have a track and field or a band room.

I just don't know how the football program – which is the bell cow program for the entire university, can ever reach its full potential playing in a stadium that is objectively and demonstrably too big for its needs and whose seats are so brightly colored that they serve to not just highlight our attendance troubles, but to actually exaggerate them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwh05
to play Devil's advocate here, we can accomplish our goals of being a top program in the coastal with our current stadium situation. It's not hindering us from becoming a good program. It's boring as all hell, an eyesore of course but in reality, its not holding us back from accomplishing a 10+ win season. There are multiple other reasons that are holding us back. cookie cutter stadium with the ambience of a funeral isn't one of them..

I do not agree with that assertion.

I think playing in a stadium that is at least 10-15K seats too large is definitely hindering us. In fact, I don't think we can reach our full potential as a program if we continue playing at Heinz Field.

It's just too big for us and it always will be.

Please don't misconstrue what I'm saying here. I'm not talking about knocking down Hillman Library to build a stadium in Oakland or going into a billion dollars in debt to fund something that is used only 8–10 times per year.

Also, I am well aware of the infrastructural challenges a football stadium in Oakland would present. I've already lived it for many years so I well know the challenges and opportunities involved. I also know that the proponents of on campus stadium always understate that issue while the opponents of it always exaggerate it.

It was crowded getting in and out and there's no denying that point. However, it wasn't exactly "Beyond ThunderDome" (if you catch my drift).

I always thought getting home to the South Hills from the Civic Arena after a Penguins game was just as difficult. You basically had to cut across people going to the north and east on Center Avenue and it bottlenecked in about 10 different places and was often a miserable experience. Sometimes PPG Paints Arena can also be tough – depending on where are you park.

Somehow, through the grace of God, I have survived all of those experiences hundreds of times over the years.

Getting back to the University of Pittsburgh, it doesn't make any sense to not at least have this conversation. Why wouldn't we want to know where we could put an on campus stadium and what it would cost? Those are pretty germane points, don't you think?

I mean, quite frankly, that means a lot more to me than whether or not we have a track and field or a band room.

I just don't know how the football program – which is the bell cow program for the entire university, can ever reach its full potential playing in a stadium that is objectively and demonstrably too big for its needs and whose seats are so brightly colored that they serve to not just highlight our attendance troubles, but to actually exaggerate them.

A lof of "gameday atmosphere" problems can be solved if they tarp down the stadium to 45K seats. Close the upper deck endzone and Pitt upper deck sideline (because its not the TV view).

Pitt is a 45K seat program anyway. We dont need 70K seats available.
 
Tarping is stupid, we can average close to 60K if we have some 10 win seasons and play with a ranking. If we're 8-1, ranked #10 and ND or Clemson or FSU come to town, we'll sell out. We're a 45k program assuming we're 7-5/8-4 and never better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZetaZetaBeta
Tarping is stupid, we can average close to 60K if we have some 10 win seasons and play with a ranking. If we're 8-1, ranked #10 and ND or Clemson or FSU come to town, we'll sell out. We're a 45k program assuming we're 7-5/8-4 and never better.

If we are 5-4 and ND comes to town it would be a near sell out as well. The problem is that we will never consistently fill Heinz Field for an average game. It's just too big and ends up looking bad. Every. Single. Year. That won't change. Ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwh05
Tarping is stupid, we can average close to 60K if we have some 10 win seasons and play with a ranking. If we're 8-1, ranked #10 and ND or Clemson or FSU come to town, we'll sell out. We're a 45k program assuming we're 7-5/8-4 and never better.

When ND or PSU come to town, you dont tarp it. Its not that complicated.

The Seattle Sounders tarp the Seahawks' stadium down to 40K and have one of the best gameday atmospheres in the country for any sport. For bigger games, they take the tarp off.
 
Why do you need tarps, just sell the lower bowl tickets or all the sections you want to sell in advance? Then on game day keep everything open for walk up traffic.
 
Again, I know some here think I'm full of crap when I say it, but I really do know someone on the athletic committee and it's true that an on campus stadium is not even on the radar, in fact they might not even have a radar to look at for it, it is really that far out of the conversation.
 
Agreed. Obviously I correlate a lot to Alabama because I went there and go to a lot of games in Tuscaloosa, but as far as stadium parking? There are probably about 800 spaces, which are less than a mile from the stadium. Another 4,000 (and it is probably more like 2,000, but I am erring on the opposite side of the argument) which the University controls between 1-2 miles from the stadium. Everything else? Satellite lots that require bus transportation to and from or people parking along streets or in private homes' yards. And they get 100k+ people there for every game and many come in on Thursday and Friday to start their festivities.

One place I have real experience at is WVU. I lived a block (not even) from the football field. The main parking lot for Mountaineer Field is also used by Ruby Hospital. Gee, are there any hospitals in Oakland? Also, the terrain around the stadium is eerily similar to Oakland. There is no "freeway" within 5 miles (the Parkway is closer to Oakland than 79 is to where the WVU football stadium is located. Alot of students are located a mile away, down a big hill. It is not ideal. They get 50-60K a game. Which wouldn't be any more than what Pitt needs.

There are just excuses. It can be done. Pitt and Pittsburgh can make it happen if they so choose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jpripper88
When ND or PSU come to town, you dont tarp it. Its not that complicated.

The Seattle Sounders tarp the Seahawks' stadium down to 40K and have one of the best gameday atmospheres in the country for any sport. For bigger games, they take the tarp off.

I am struggling to see why this is so difficult? I think ego has gotten in the way of common sense.
 
When ND or PSU come to town, you dont tarp it. Its not that complicated.

The Seattle Sounders tarp the Seahawks' stadium down to 40K and have one of the best gameday atmospheres in the country for any sport. For bigger games, they take the tarp off.

I am struggling to see why this is so difficult? I think ego has gotten in the way of common sense.

Ego and I think the tarp makes it harder for us to make up attendance numbers. I think we are drawing 20K-25K more often than anyone would want to believe but with a 70K stadium, you can say the crowd was 39K or 41K and its hard to prove otherwise.

If a 45K seat tarped-down stadium, is hald empty, you cant say there were 39K there.
 
Ego and I think the tarp makes it harder for us to make up attendance numbers. I think we are drawing 20K-25K more often than anyone would want to believe but with a 70K stadium, you can say the crowd was 39K or 41K and its hard to prove otherwise.

If a 45K seat tarped-down stadium, is hald empty, you cant say there were 39K there.

Trumpmath?
 
Tarping is stupid, we can average close to 60K if we have some 10 win seasons and play with a ranking. If we're 8-1, ranked #10 and ND or Clemson or FSU come to town, we'll sell out. We're a 45k program assuming we're 7-5/8-4 and never better.

I always get a kick out of you commenting on attendance issues.
 
I just don't know how the football program – which is the bell cow program for the entire university, can ever reach its full potential playing in a stadium that is objectively and demonstrably too big for its needs and whose seats are so brightly colored that they serve to not just highlight our attendance troubles, but to actually exaggerate them.

$200 million for something that is used 6 times a year? yeah that's going to happen in our lifetimes.
 
Again, I know some here think I'm full of crap when I say it, but I really do know someone on the athletic committee and it's true that an on campus stadium is not even on the radar, in fact they might not even have a radar to look at for it, it is really that far out of the conversation.

True. You could use the hubble telescope and still not be able to find it
 
Why do you need tarps, just sell the lower bowl tickets or all the sections you want to sell in advance? Then on game day keep everything open for walk up traffic.
Absolutely this! Been saying the same since, well, 2001.

But an even better solution is simply to spend on the best coaches, and the juice needed to secure the best possible recruits. Win 10 plus games multiple years, at least the Coastal, then the ACC champ and a run or two at the NC. It is indisputable that the stadium would be filled if that happened, no tarps and restricting needed, at increased prices and donations that would more than make up for the couple extra million this might cost beyond the rock bottom they invest now.
 
True. You could use the hubble telescope and still not be able to find it
I'd hate to let the athletic dept try to operate a Hubble Telesccope??
They've had trouble doing simple things like hiring football coaches over the last five years, securing an AD that can find his a-s with both hands, replacing a basketball coach with a worse coach.
I think they need to stick to simple things!
 
I always get a kick out of you commenting on attendance issues.

Just because I only go to one or two games a year, doesn't preclude me from commenting on attendance. They should thank me for coming that much. I'm sure there are tens of thousands of Pittsburghers who live there all their lives and never go to a single game. And if they where 12-0 and ranked #1, I wouldn't come to any more games than I do now.
 
Right sizing Heinz Field (Tarping) for Pitt Football games is the way which should be studied.

70,000 seats tarped down to 55,000 (Old Pitt Stadium) would be a simple task.

When playing Penn State, Notre Dame, WVU, no need to tarp and sell 15,000 additional game day tickets.

Worked for years at Three Rivers Stadium where the Pirates tarped a 60,000 seat stadium down to a 30,000 seat stadium for Pirate baseball games (Right sizing Three Rivers Stadium).

This concept should realistically studied by the Pitt Administration for implementation.

A new stadium to be used only 7 times or a total of 28 hours per year costing maybe $500 million is a total waste of money.

That money could be better spent on maybe hiring a good AD or basketball head coach or retaining a very good OC.

HAIL TO PITT!!!!
 
I'd hate to let the athletic dept try to operate a Hubble Telesccope??
They've had trouble doing simple things like hiring football coaches over the last five years, securing an AD that can find his a-s with both hands, replacing a basketball coach with a worse coach.
I think they need to stick to simple things!

yeah it truly amazes how incredibly bad the athletic administration has been. And when not bad, it is average (i.e. the Nordenberg/Pederson era), never excellent. I thought Barnes had promise but he turned into another in the long line of losers.

And we have a ton of experience hiring coaches and barely ever get it right (Narduzzi seems like he will be an exception, as was Dixon). How does Penn State make only 3 head football coach hires in 60 years and picks a winner?
 
yeah it truly amazes how incredibly bad the athletic administration has been. And when not bad, it is average (i.e. the Nordenberg/Pederson era), never excellent. I thought Barnes had promise but he turned into another in the long line of losers.

And we have a ton of experience hiring coaches and barely ever get it right (Narduzzi seems like he will be an exception, as was Dixon). How does Penn State make only 3 head football coach hires in 60 years and picks a winner?

Pitt Athletics, making the easy seem hard for 35 years and counting.
 
$200 million for something that is used 6 times a year? yeah that's going to happen in our lifetimes.
Your argument's bull $hit. 98% of div one schools have their own stadium. If you can't get past the utility of Pitt's having its own stadium, go root for somebody else. We don't need you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT